Modular megaendoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur affected by osteoblastoclastoma
- Authors: Smetanin S.M1,2, Lychagin A.V1,2, Rukin Y.A1,2, Grltsyuk A.A1,2
-
Affiliations:
- Traumatology, Orthopedics, and Joint Pathology Clinic, University Clinical Hospital One
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
- Issue: Vol 31, No 5 (2020)
- Pages: 66-70
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0236-3054/article/view/114246
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.29296/25877305-2020-05-15
- ID: 114246
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
Proximal femoral replacement with simultaneous muscle reconstruction is an urgent problem for the treatment of proximal femoral tumors. The authors analyze the data available in the literature and their own clinical observation of proximal femoral resection; the resulting bone and soft tissue defects were replaced using a modular endoprosthesis.
Full Text
About the authors
S. M Smetanin
Traumatology, Orthopedics, and Joint Pathology Clinic, University Clinical Hospital One; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
Email: dr.smetaninsm@gmail.com
MD
A. V Lychagin
Traumatology, Orthopedics, and Joint Pathology Clinic, University Clinical Hospital One; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)Professor , MD
Ya. A Rukin
Traumatology, Orthopedics, and Joint Pathology Clinic, University Clinical Hospital One; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)Candidate of Medical Sciences
A. A Grltsyuk
Traumatology, Orthopedics, and Joint Pathology Clinic, University Clinical Hospital One; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)Professor , MD
References
- Capanna R., Morris H., Campanacci D. et al. Modular uncemented prosthetic reconstruction after resection of tumours of the distal femur. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1994; 76: 178-86.
- Engh C., Glassman A., Griffin W. et al. Results of cementless revision for failed cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988; 235: 91-110.
- Gustilo R., Pasternak H. Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988; 235: 111-9.
- Heisel C., Breusch S., Schmid G. et al. Lower limb salvage surgery with MUTARS endoprostheses: 2 to 7 year results. Acta Orthop Belg. 2004; 70 (2): 142-7.
- Heisel С., Kinkel S., Bernd L. et al. Megaprostheses for the treatment of malignantbone tumours of the lower limbs. Int Orthop. 2006; 30 (6): 452-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0207-7
- Kawai A., Lin P., Boland P. et al. Relationship between magnitude of resection, complication, and prosthetic survival after prosthetic knee reconstructions for distal femoral tumors. J Surg Oncol. 1999; 70 (2): 109-15. DOI: 10.1002/ (sici)1096-9098(199902)70:2<109::aid-jso9>3.0.co;2-x
- Prevention of tumor prosthesis dislocation by joint capsule reconstruction with artificial grafts: Eighth International Symp. on Limb Salvage. Florence, Italy, 1995; p. 43.
- Ueda T., Kakunaga S., Takenaka S. et al. Constrained Total Hip Megaprosthesis for Primary Periacetabular Tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471 (3): 741-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2625-8
- Wagner H., Wagner M. Femur revision prosthesis. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1993; 131: 574-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1040074
- Вырва О.Е. Реконструкция мягких тканей при модульном мегаэндопротезировании у больных со злокачественными опухолями костей. Ортопедия, травматология и протезирование. 2008; 4: 54-61
Supplementary files
