The health status of children born after various assisted reproductive technologies


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

To study the health of children born after assisted reproductive technologies (ART) is an urgent task of medicine. Objective: to investigate the features of social and biological histories, morbidity, and anthropometric measures in children born after ART with transfer of cryopreserved and native embryos. Subjects and methods. The investigation enrolled 313 children and their mothers. Group 1 included 153 children born after cryopreserved embryo transfer (CET); Group 2 consisted of 160 children born after native embryo transfer (NET). The data was copied from the individual case records when using ART (Form No. 111-1/y-03) and neonatal (Form No. 097/y) and infant (Form No. 112/y and Form No. 003/y) ones. Social and biological history data, morbidity, and neonatal anthropometric measures (body weight, body height, and head and chest circumferences) were analyzed. Results. Mothers of children born after CET and NET did not differ in age, social and obstetric history. The mean anthropometric measures of full-term singletons born after CET were significantly higher than those after NET. Children who were born at less than 34 weeks showed no differences in the neonatal anthropometric measures according to the ART method. The structure of neonatal morbidity did not depend on the ART method; both after CET and NET, brain ischemia held the lead in the structure of morbidity, prematurity ranked next, and congenital pneumonia, unspecified occupied the third place.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

O. M Filkina

V.N. Gorodkov Ivanovo Research Institute of Maternity and Childhood, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: omfilkina@mail.ru

E. A Vorobyeva

V.N. Gorodkov Ivanovo Research Institute of Maternity and Childhood, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: 0000-0003-2820-9714

A. I Malyshkina

V.N. Gorodkov Ivanovo Research Institute of Maternity and Childhood, Ministry of Health of Russia

N. V Dolotova

V.N. Gorodkov Ivanovo Research Institute of Maternity and Childhood, Ministry of Health of Russia

Z-B. F Arekhova

V.N. Gorodkov Ivanovo Research Institute of Maternity and Childhood, Ministry of Health of Russia

References

  1. Cobo A., Santos M.J., Castello D. et al. Outcomes of vitrified early cleavagestage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles. Fertil Steril. 2012; 98 (5): 1138-46. DOI: 10.1016/j. fertnstert.2012.07.1107
  2. Кравчук Я.Н., Калугина А.С., Быстрова О.В. и др. Эффективность и исходы программ c криоконсервацией эмбрионов в протоколах вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2014; 63 (4): 39-46 @@Kravchuk Y.N., Kalugina A.S., Bystrova O.V. et al. Effectiveness and outcomes of embryo cryopreservation programs in assisted reproductive technologies. Journal of obstetrics and women’s diseases. 2014; 63 (4): 39-46 (in Russ.)]. doi: 10.17816/JOWD63439-46
  3. Наими З.М.-С. Обоснование выбора цикла переноса нативных или криоконсервированных эмбрионов с использованием молекулярно-генетических маркеров в программах вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Автореф. дис.. канд. мед. наук. М., 2017; 20 с. @@Naimi Z.M.-S. Obosnovaniye vybora tsikla perenosa nativnykh ili kriokonservirovannykh embrionov s ispol’zovaniyem molekulyarno-geneticheskikh markerov v programmakh vspomogatel’nykh reproduktivnykh tekhnologiy. Avtoref. dis.. kand. med. nauk. M., 2017; 20 s. (in Russ.)].
  4. Михеева Е.М., Пенкина Н.И. Здоровье детей, рожденных с использованием вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Практическая медицина. 2014; 85 (9): 47-51 @@Mikheeva E.M., Penkina N.I. The health status of children conceived with assisted reproductive technologies. Prakticheskaya meditsina. 2014; 85 (9): 47-51 (in Russ.)].
  5. Малышкина А.И., Матвеева Е.А., Филькина О.М. и др. Состояние здоровья детей первого года жизни, родившихся после экстракорпорального оплодотворения. Российский вестник перинатологии и педиатрии. 2019; 64 (1): 39-45 @@Malyshkina A.I., Matveeva Y.A., Filkina O.M. et al. The health status of children born after in vitro fertilization in their first 12 months of life. Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii = Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics. 2019; 64 (1): 39-45 (in Russ.)]. doi: 10.21508/1027-4065-2019-64-1-39-45
  6. Баранов А.А., Намазова-Баранова Л.С., Беляева И.А. и др. Медикосоциальные проблемы вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий с позиции педиатрии. Вестник РАМН. 2015; 70 (3): 307-14 @@Baranov A.A., Namazova-Baranova L.S., Belyaeva I.A. et al. Medical and social problems of assisted reproductive technologies from the standpoint of Pediatrics. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii meditsinskikh nauk = Annals of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. 2015; 70 (3): 307-14 (in Russ.)]. doi: 10.15690/vramn. v70i3.1326
  7. Самойлова Ю.Г., Матвеева М.В., Петров И.А. и др. Вспомогательные репродуктивные технологии и параметры здоровья детей. Вопросы гематоло-гии/онкологии и иммунопатологии в педиатрии. 2021; 20 (1): 218-21 @@Samoilova Yu.G., Matveeva M.V., Petrov I.A. et al. Assisted reproductive technologies and children’s health parameters. Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and Immunopathology. 2021; 20 (1): 218-21 (in Russ.)]. doi: 10.24287/1726-1708-2021-20-1-218-221
  8. Мельник Л.А., Иова А.С., Щугарева Л.М. Состояние здоровья детей, рожденных при помощи вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Педиатрия. Журнал им. Г.Н. Сперанского. 2017; 96 (1): 110-6 @@Melnik L.A., Iova A.S., Schugareva L.M. Health of children born with by means of assisted reproductive technologies. Pediatria. Journal named after G.N. Speransky. 2017; 96 (1): 110-6 (in Russ.)]. doi: 10.24110/0031-403X-2017-96-1-110-116
  9. Краева О.А., Башмакова Н.В., Цивьян П.Б. Состояние здоровья недоношенных детей первого года жизни, зачатых путем экстракорпорального оплодотворения. Российский вестник перинатологии и педиатрии. 2018; 63 (3): 32-8 @@Kraeva O.A., Bashmakova N.V., Tsyvyan P.B. The state of health of premature infants in the first year of life conceived by in vitro fertilization. Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii = Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics. 2018; 63 (3): 32-8 (in Russ.)]. doi: 10.21508/1027-4065-2018-63-3-32-38
  10. Зюзикова З.С., Волеводз Н.Н., Шестакова М.В. и др. Анализ структуры и частоты врожденных пороков развития у детей, рожденных с помощью вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. 2019; 18 (6): 85-91 @@Zyuzikova Z.S., Volevodz N.N., Shestakova МУ et al. Analysis of the structure and prevalence of congenital anomalies in children born following assisted reproductive technologies. Vopr ginekol akus perinatol = Gynecology, Obstetrics and Perinatology. 2019; 18(6): 85-91 (in Russ.)]. doi: 10.20953/1726-1678-2019-6-85-91
  11. Shi W., Xue X., Zhang S. et al. Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of 494 babies delivered from 972 vitrified embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97 (6): 1338-42. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.051
  12. Wikland M., Hardarson T., Hillensjo T. et al. Obstetric outcomes after transfer of vitrified blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2010; 25 (7): 1699-707. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq117

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies