3D TECHNOLOGIES FOR REVISION TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The authors have evaluated the efficiency of using full-sized gypsum-based 3D models to plan revision hip arthroplasty for complex acetabular defect. The use of modern 3D printers and software makes these technologies more affordable.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

G. Kavalersky

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Professor

V. Murylev

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University; S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital

Professor

Ya. Rukin

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: yar.rukin@gmail.com
Candidate of Medical Sciences

Ya. Elizarov

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University; S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital

Candidate of Medical Sciences

E. Dzhenzhera

OOO «Endoprint», Moscow

Candidate of Medical Sciences

References

  1. Москалев В.П., Корнилов Н.В., Шапиро К.И. и др. Медицинские и социальные проблемы эндопротезирования суставов конечностей / СПб: МОРСАР АВ, 2001; 159 с.
  2. Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E. et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. - 2007; 89 (4): 780-5.
  3. Sheth N., Melnic C., Paprosky W. et al. Acetabular distraction analternative for severe acetabular bone loss and chronic pelvic discontinuity // Bone Joint J. - 2014; 96 (11): 36-42.
  4. Brown N., Hellman M., Haughom B. et al. Acetabular distraction an alternative approach to pelvic discontinuity in failed total hip replacement // Bone Joint J. - 2014; 96 (11): 73-7.
  5. Villanueva M., Rios-Luna A., Pereiro De Lamo J. et al. (2008). A review of the treatment of pelvic discontinuity // HSS Journal: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery. - 2008; 4 (2): 128-37.
  6. Berasi C., Berend K., Adams J. et al. Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss? // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Research. - 2015; 473 (2): 528-35.
  7. Hogan C., Ries M. Treatment of massive acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity with a custom triflange component and ilio-sacral fixation based on preoperative CT templating. A report of 2 cases // J. Clin. Exp. Research Hip Pathol. Ther. - 2015; 25 (6): 585-8.
  8. Taunton M., Fehring T., Edwards P. et al. Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Research. -2012; 470 (2): 428-34.
  9. Paprosky W., Perona P. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation // J. Arthroplasty. - 1994; 9 (1): 33-44.
  10. Jeong M., Kim H.-J., Lim S.-J. et al. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Tantalum Augment in Patients with Paprosky III or IV Acetabular Bone Defects: A Minimum 2-year Follow Up Study // Hip pelvis. - 2016; 28 (2): 98-103.
  11. Del Gaizo D., Kancherla V., Sporer S. et al. Tantalum augments for Paprosky IIIA defects remain stable at midterm follow up // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. - 2012; 470 (2): 395-401.
  12. Siegmeth A., Duncan C., Masri B. et al. Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty // Clin. Orthop. Relat Res. - 2009; 467 (1): 199-205.
  13. Long W., Noiseux N., Mabry T. et al. Uncemented Porous Tantalum Acetabular Components: Early Follow-Up and Failures in 599 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties // Iowa Orthop. J. - 2015; 35: 10813.
  14. Whitehouse M., Masri B., Duncan C. et al. Continued good results with modular trabecular metal augments for acetabular defects in hip arthroplasty at 7 to 11 years // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. - 2015; 473 (2): 521-7.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies