Tactics of combined/complex treatment of patients with breast cancer with isolated metastatic lesions of supraclavicular or parasternal lymph nodes

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Purpose. To evaluate the treatment tactics for patients with breast cancer (BC) with isolated metastatic lesions of the supraclavicular or parasternal lymph nodes (LNs).

Material and methods. We analyzed the data of 134 patients with breast cancer, who were divided into 2 groups: 1st (n=83) – patients with lesions of the supraclavicular and parasternal lymph nodes, both isolated and in combination with lesions of any other groups of lymph nodes; 2nd (n=51) – patients with isolated or combined lesions of only subclavian or axillary lymph nodes. In group 1, lymphadenectomy was performed in 27 patients (subgroup 1A), radiation therapy of the affected lymph nodes was performed in 56 (subgroup 1B). In group 2, patients received chemotherapy for the affected lymph nodes.

Results. Survival after 1 year of observation was almost the same in subgroups 1A (surgical treatment of lymph nodes) and 1B (radiation therapy of lymph nodes) – 96.3 and 96.4%, respectively; after 3 years of observation – 77.8 and 80.4%, respectively; 5-year survival rate – 33.3 and 44.6%, respectively. However, the data obtained were statistically unreliable.

Conclusion. When comparing 5-year overall survival, surgical removal of metastatic supraclavicular and parasternal lymph nodes is inferior to radiation therapy. Thus, it can be assumed that excluding the surgical stage of LN treatment does not worsen the results of therapy in the group of patients with breast cancer and metastatic lesions of supraclavicular or parasternal LNs.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

P. Kupriyanov

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)

Email: rasskaz2@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5671-6097
Russian Federation, Moscow

A. Zikiryakhodzhaev

Research Center of Radiology, Ministry of Health of Russia; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University); Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Email: rasskaz2@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7141-2502

MD

Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow; Moscow

I. Reshetov

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)

Email: rasskaz2@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0909-6278

Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, MD, Professor

Russian Federation, Moscow

E. Rasskazova

P.A. Herzen Moscow Research Oncology Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: rasskaz2@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0307-8252

Candidate of Medical Sciences

Russian Federation, Moscow

F. Khugaeva

P.A. Herzen Moscow Research Oncology Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: rasskaz2@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9749-0445
Russian Federation, Moscow

Yu. Butova

P.A. Herzen Moscow Research Oncology Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: rasskaz2@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0532-8668
Russian Federation, Moscow

I. Duadze

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)

Email: rasskaz2@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9577-584X
Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Каприн А.Д., Старинский В.В., Шахзадова А.О. Состояние онкологической помощи населению России в 2021 году. М.: МНИОИ им. П.А. Герцена – филиал ФГБУ «НМИЦ радиологии» Минздрава России, 2022; 239 с. [Kaprin A.D., Starinskii V.V., Shakhzadova A.O. Sostoyanie onkologicheskoi pomoshchi naseleniyu Rossii v 2021 godu. M.: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena – filial FGBU «NMITs radiologii» Minzdrava Rossii, 2022; 239 р. (in Russ.)]
  2. Belkacemi Y., Loganadane G., Ghith S. et al. Axillary nodal irradiation practice in the sentinel lymph node biopsy era: Comparison of the contemporary available 3D and IMRT techniques. Br J Radiol. 2020; 93 (1110): 20190351. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20190351
  3. Berruti A., Amoroso V., Gallo F. et al. Pathologic complete response as a potential surrogate for the clinical outcome in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-regression of 29 randomized prospective studies. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32 (34): 3883–91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.2836
  4. Bonotto M., Gerratana L., Poletto E. et al. Measures of outcome in metastatic breast cancer: insights from a realworld scenario. Oncologist. 2014; 19 (6): 608–15. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0002
  5. Borm K.J., Oechsner M., Dusberg M. et al. Irradiation of regional lymph node areas in breast cancer – Dose evaluation according to the Z0011, AMAROS, EORTC 10981-22023 and MA-20 field design. Radiother Oncol. 2020; 142: 195–201. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.08.021
  6. Doepker M.P., Zager J.S. Sentinel lymph node mapping in melanoma in the twenty-first century. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2015; 24 (2): 249–60. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2014.12.004
  7. Fan Y., Xu B., Liao Y. et al. A retrospective study of metachronous and synchronous ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients. Breast. 2010; 19 (5): 365–9. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2010.03.022
  8. Gillon P., Touati N., Breton-Callu C. et al. Factors predictive of locoregional recurrence following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with large operable or locally advanced breast cancer: An analysis of the EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 study. Eur J Cancer. 2017; 79: 226–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.04.012
  9. Jung J., Kim S.S., Ahn S.D. et al. Treatment Outcome of Breast Cancer with Pathologically Proven Synchronous Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Node Metastases. J Breast Cancer. 2015; 18 (2): 167–72. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2015.18.2.167
  10. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) Breast Cancer Version 4.2022. June 21, 2022.
  11. Reintgen M., Kerivan L., Reintgen E. et al. Breast lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy: state of the art: 2015. Clin Breast Cancer. 2016; 16 (3): 155–65. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.02.014
  12. Shan R., Zhu T., Zhang M. et al. Value of supraclavicular region radiotherapy on patients with pT1-2N1M0 breast cancer after mastectomy. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019; 44 (6): 664–71. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2019.06.009
  13. Zhang W., Qi X.M., Chen A.X. et al. The Role of Supraclavicular lymph node dissection in Breast Cancer Patients with Synchronous Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Node Metastasis. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2017; 39 (5): 374–9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2017.05.011
  14. Nikpayam M., Uzan C., Rivera S. et al. Impact of radical surgery on outcome in locally advanced breast cancer patients without metastasis at the time of diagnosis. Anticancer Res. 2015; 35 (3): 1729–34.
  15. Zhao P., Zou Q., Yuan L. et al. Application of a Three-Dimensional Reconstruction System in Breast Cancer with Ipsilateral Supraclavicular Lymph Node Metastasis: A Case Series. Breast Care (Basel). 2019; 14 (3): 176–9. doi: 10.1159/000492601
  16. Zhu J., Jiao D., Guo X. et al. Predictive factors and prognostic value of pathologic complete response of ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph nodes in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Transl Med. 2019; 7 (22): 666. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.10.22

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Survival in the total sample of breast cancer patients (n=134)

Download (115KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Russkiy Vrach Publishing House

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies