Technology of surgical guide development: practical application in implantology
- Authors: Osmanova N.D.1
-
Affiliations:
- "Okodent" LLC
- Issue: Vol 36, No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 57-61
- Section: From Practice
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0236-3054/article/view/676829
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.29296/25877305-2025-01-11
- ID: 676829
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
Purpose. To examine and describe the steps involved in creating a surgical guide for dental implant installation, and to assess the advantages of using surgical guides compared to traditional implant placement methods.
Materials and methods. The study utilized data from cone-beam computed tomography, intraoral scanning, and specialized software for data merging and surgical guide modeling. A clinical case with the installation of three implants was analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of the method. Additionally, 15 similar cases were reviewed where implant placement was performed without using a surgical guide to compare operation times.
Results. The results showed that using a surgical guide reduced the operation time to 23 minutes compared to the average duration of 58 minutes with the traditional method.
Conclusions. The use of guides minimizes the need for constant checks and adjustments, reduces the risk of complications, and improves patient comfort by shortening the time spent on the operating table. Patients feel more confident in the outcome since the template minimizes the likelihood of medical errors.
Full Text
About the authors
N. D. Osmanova
"Okodent" LLC
Author for correspondence.
Email: naidaosmanova18@icloud.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-8653-7424
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
References
- Дегтярев Н.Е., Мухаметшин Р.Ф., Мамедов С.И. др. Этапы изготовления хирургических шаблонов и их применение в сложных клинических случаях. Голова и шея. Российский журнал. 2020; 8 (3): 61–7 [Degtyarev N.E., Mukhametshin R.F., Mamedov S. et al. Stages of manufacturing surgical templates and their application in complex clinical cases. Head and neck. Russian Journal. 2020; 8 (3): 61–7 (in Russ)]. doi: 10.25792/HN.2020.8.3.61–67
- Иващенко А.В., Яблоков А.Е., Антонян Я.Э. и др. Анализ методов дентальной имплантации. Вестник медицинского института «РЕАВИЗ»: реабилитация, врач и здоровье. 2018; 3 (33): 65–75 [Ivashchenko A.V., Yablokov A.E., Antonyan Ya. E. et al. Analysis of dental implantation techniques. Bulletin of the Medical Institute "REAVIZ": Rehabilitation, Doctor and Health. 2018; 3 (33): 65–75 (in Rus)].
- Метелев И.А., Звигинцев М.А., Фокас Н.Н. и др. Использование хирургического навигационного шаблона в дентальной имплантации. Актуальные вопросы современной науки: мат-лы XVIII междунар. научно-практ. конф. Томск, 13 февраля 2019 г. Уфа, 2019; с. 96–101 [Metelev I. A., Zvigintsev M. A., Fokas N. N. et al. Analysis of the features of using a surgical navigation template during dental implantation surgery. Current Issues of Modern Science: Proceedings of the 18th International Scientific and Practical Conference. Tomsk, February 13, 2019. Ufa, 2019; pp. 96–101 (in Rus)].
- Жолудев С.Е., Нерсесян П.М. Современные знания и клинические перспективы использования для позиционирования дентальных имплантатов хирургических шаблонов: обзор литературы. Проблемы стоматологии. 2017; 13 (4): 74–80 [Zholudev S.E., Nersesyan P.M. Modern knowledge and clinical perspectives of use for positioning dental implants of surgical templates. Literature review. The problems of dentistry. 2017; 13 (4): 74–80 (in Russ)]. doi: 10.18481/2077-7566-2017-13-4-74-80
- Jacobs R., Salmon B., Codari M. et al. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health. 2018; 18 (1): 88. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5
- Kernen F., Kramer J., Wanner L. et al. A review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery: data import and visualization, drill guide design and manufacturing. BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20 (1): 251. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01208-1
- Buser D., Bornstein M.M., Weber H.P. et al. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 subjects with a 2 to 4-year follow-up. J Periodontol. 2008; 79 (9): 1773–81. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.080071
- Buser D., Wittneben J., Bornstein, M.M. et al. Stability of contour augmentation and esthetic outcomes of implant-supported single crowns in the esthetic zone: 3-year results of a prospective study with early implant placement postextraction. J Periodontal. 2011; 82 (3): 342–9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100408
- Linkevicius T., Puisys A., Vindasiute E. et al. Does residual cement around implant-supported restorations cause peri-implant disease? A retrospective case analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24 (11): 1179–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02570.x
- Ramanauskaite A., Becker J., Sader R. et al. Anatomic factors as contributing risk factors in implant therapy. Periodontol 2000. 2019; 81 (1): 64–75. doi: 10.1111/prd.12284
Supplementary files
