CESAREAN SECTION IN THE UNFORMED LOWER UTERINE SEGMENT


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To determine the optimum technology for cesarean section in pregnant women with the unformed lower uterine segment. Subjects and methods. Eighty-eight puerperas were examined after cesarean section carried out in the presence of the unformed lower uterine segment. A transverse semilunar incision was made in 30 cases; an isthmic cervical incision was done using the Shmiden method and separate knotty sutures in 32; the modified Stark’s procedure applying a double-row suture was performed in 26, as described by Reverden. The nature of reparative processes at the site of the uterine incision was assessed from suture involution index, protein coefficient, and trends in the cytological pattern of uterine cavity aspirate. Results. The least good healing occurred after use of an isthmic cervical incision. The best healing was observed when the modified Stark’s procedure (a semilunar diagonal incision and Reverden suturing) was applied. This is indicated by the higher suture area evolution index and the time course of changes in cytological parameters and in the levels of immunoglobulins in the metroaspirate. Conclusion. The findings enable one to recommend this surgical technique in women with the unformed lower uterine segment.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

V. A KRAMARSKY

Irkutsk State Institute for Postgraduate Training of Physicians, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

Email: makalisterl987@mail.ru

V. N DUDAKOVA

Irkutsk State Institute for Postgraduate Training of Physicians, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

N. L SVERKUNOVA

Irkutsk State Institute for Postgraduate Training of Physicians, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

References

  1. Крамарский В.А., Раевская Л.Ю., Дудакова В.Н. Морфологический индекс как прогностический критерий заживления раны на матке после кесарева сечения // Акуш. и гин. - 2002. - № 6. — С. 58-58.
  2. Крамарский В.А., Дудакова В.Н., Мащакевич Л.И., Нецветаева Т.Д. Оценочные критерии качества заживления раны на матке после кесарева сечения // Акуш. и гин. — 2003. - № 3. — С. 29-31.
  3. Краснопольский В.И., Логутова Л.С., Буянова С.Н. Репродуктивные проблемы оперированной матки. -М.: Миклош, 2008.
  4. Кулаков В.И., Чернуха Е.А., Комисарова Л.М. Кесарево сечение. — М.: Триада —Х, 2004.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies