THE FMR1 GENE: NEW POSSIBILITIES OF ASSESSING THE OVARIAN RESERVE


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia, Moscow Objective. To reveal the ranging number of CGG repeats in patients with premature ovarian failure (POF) and their associations with the level of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH). Subjects and methods. At the first stage of the study, the patients were divided into 3 groups (A, B, and C) according to the number of CGG repeats in the alleles (allele 1 with a smaller number of repeats and 2 with their larger number). At the second stage, these were classified into 3 groups according to the found zygosity in the fragile X mental retardation (FMR1) gene. Group 1 included women with both alleles being in the normal range of repeats, i.e. 26-34 repeats; Group 2 comprised the heterozygous carriers of the abnormal number of repeats, i.e. one allele was in the normal range, the other was outside this range; Group 3 consisted of women having the alleles outside the normal range of CGG repeats (26>CGG>34). A statistical correlation was determined between the number of repeats and the parameters of the ovarian reserve. Results. In the patients with POF, the frequency of both normal and abnormal lengths of CGG repeats in the FMR1 gene was practically equal (45 versus 55%). The group with the normal number of repeats (Group B) showed a statistically significant increase in the level of AMH as compared to the short (Group A) and long (Group C) number of repeats (0.49±1.13, 0.1±0.14, and 0.09±0.15 pg/ml, respectively; p < 0.05). The patients with a drastically diminished ovarian reserve were more typified by shorter CGG repeat lengths than their extension (34 versus 11%), which was slightly different from the conventional viewpoint given in the literature. Most authors previously pointed out that longer CGG repeat lengths in the grey (41-50) and permutation (51-200) zones were of diagnostic value. Comparative analysis revealed a direct moderate correlation between the number of CGG repeats in the FMR1 gene and the level of AMH in Group A (r = 0.358; p < 0.05). At the same time, Group C exhibited an inverse moderate correlation between the number of repeats and the concentration of AMH (r = -0.3174; p < 0.05). No correlation was found between the level of AMH and age in the group with the normal number of repeats. The content of AMH was moderately inversely proportional to age in the groups with the homozygous and heterozygous carriage of abnormal CGG repeat lengths. Conclusion. The length of CGG repeats in the FMR1 gene may be certainly one of the early objective predictors of POF and serve as a new test for the prediction of ovarian functional activity.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

N. N SHAMILOVA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

Email: drshamilova@gmail.com

L. A MARCHENKO

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

References

  1. Габибуллаева З.Г. Клинико-генетическая характеристика больных с преждевременной недостаточностью яичников: Дис.. канд. мед. наук. — M., 2008.
  2. Мишиева Н.Г. Бесплодие у женщин позднего репродуктивного возраста: принципы диагностики и лечения в зависимости от овариального резерва: Дис.. д-ра. мед. наук — М., 2008. - С. 168—176.
  3. Табеева Г.И. Оценка андрогенного статуса при преждевременной недостаточности яичников и дифференцированный подход к лечению: Дис.. канд. мед. наук. — М., 2009. — С. 85—86.
  4. Bachner D. et al. Enhanced expression of the murine FMR1 gene during germ cell proliferation suggests a special function in both the male and the female gonad // Hum. Mol. Genet. — 1993. — Vol. 2. — P. 2043-2050.
  5. Bennetto L., Pennington B.F., Porter D. et al. Profile of cognitive functioning in women with the fragile X mutation // Neuropsychology. — 2001. — Vol. 15. — P. 290-299.
  6. Bussani C., Papi L., Sestini R. et al. Premature ovarian failure and fragile X premutation: a study on 45 women // Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. — 2004. — Vol. 112. — P. 189-191.
  7. Chen L.S., Tassone F., Sahota P. et al. The (CGG) repeat element within the 5' untranslated region of the FMR1 message provides both positive and negative cis effects on in vivo translation of a downstream reporter // Hum. Mol. Genet. — 2003. - Vol. 12. — P. 3067-3074.
  8. Conway G.S., Payne N.N., Webb J. et al. Fragile X permutation screening in women with premature ovarian failure // Hum. Reprod. -1998. — Vol. 13. — P. 1184—1187.
  9. Cronister A., Schreiner R., Wittenberger M. et al. Heterozygous fragile X female: historical, physical, cognitive, and cytogenetic features // Am. J. Med. Genet. — 1991. — Vol. 38. — P. 269-274.
  10. Ennis S., Ward D., Murray A. Nonlinear association between CGG repeat number and age of menopause in FMR1 premutation carriers // Eur. J. Hum. Genet. — 2006. — Vol. 14. — P. 253-255.
  11. Fu Y.H., Kuhl D.P., Pizzuti A. et al. Variation of the CGG repeat at the fragile X site results in genetic instability: resolution of the Sherman paradox // Cell. -1991. - Vol. 67. — P. 1047-1058.
  12. Gleicher N., Weghofer A., Barad D.H. A pilot study of premature ovarian senescence: I. correlation of triple CGG repeats on the FMR1 gene to ovarian reserve parameters FSH and anti-Müllerian hormone // Fertil. and Steril. — 2009. — Vol. 91. — P. 1700-1706.
  13. Gleicher N., Weghofer A., Oktay K. Can the FMR1 (fragile X) gene serve as predictor of response to ovarian stimulation? // Reprod. Sci. — 2009. — Vol. 16. — P. 462- 467.
  14. Gleicher N., Weghofer A., Oktay K. et al. Relevance of triple CGG repeats in the FMR1 gene to ovarian reserve // Reprod. Biomed. Online. — 2009. — Vol. 19, № 3. - P. 385-390.
  15. Gleicher N., Weghofer A., Barad D.H. A pilot study of premature ovarian senescence: II. Different genotype and phenotype for genetic and autoimmune etiologies // Fertil. and Steril. — 2009. — Vol. 91, № 5. — P. 1707—1711.
  16. Gleicher N., Weghofer A., Oktay K. Do etiologies of premature ovarian aging (POA) mimic those of premature ovarian failure (POF)? // Hum. Reprod. — 2009. — Vol. 24. — P. 2395-2400.
  17. Gleicher N., Weghofer A., Oktay K., Barad D.H. Correlation of triple repeats on the FMR1 (fragile X) gene to ovarian reserve: a new infertility test? // Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. — 2009. — Vol. 88. — P. 1024-1030.
  18. Gleicher N., Weghofer A, Barad D.H. Effects of race/ethnicity on triple CGG counts on FMR1 gene in infertile women and egg donors // Reprod. Biomed. Online — 2010. — Vol. 20, № 4. — P. 485—491.
  19. Gleicher N., Weghofer A., Barad D.H. Ovarian reserve determinations suggest new function of FMR1 (fragile X) gene in regulating ovarian aging // Reprod. Biomed. Online. — 2010. — Vol. 20, № 6. — P. 768—775.
  20. Hergersberg M. et al. Tissue-specific expression of a FMR1/beta-galactosidase fusion gene in transgenic mice // Hum. Mol. Genet. — 1995. — Vol. 4. — P. 359-366.
  21. Jin P., Alisch R.S., Warren S. T. RNA and microRNAs in fragile X mental retardation // Nat. Cell Biol. — 2004. — Vol. 6. — P. 1048-1053.
  22. Nikolaou D., Templeton A. Early ovarian ageing // Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. — 2004. — Vol. 113. — P. 126-133.
  23. Rife M. et al. Immunohistochemical FMR1 studies in a full mutated female fetus // Am. J. Med. Genet. - 2004. — Vol. 124. — P. 129—132.
  24. Sullivan A.K., Marcus M., Epstein M.P. et al. Association of FMR1 repeat size with ovarian dysfunction // Hum. Reprod. — 2005. — Vol. 20. — P. 402-412.
  25. Van Rooij I.A., Broekmans F.J., te Velde E.R. et al. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels: a novel measure of ovarian reserve // Hum. Reprod. — 2002. - Vol. 17. — P. 3065—3071.
  26. Welt C.K., Smith P.C., Taylor A. E. Evidence of early ovarian aging in fragile X premutation carriers // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. — 2004. — Vol. 89, № 9. — P. 4569-4574.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies