THE PRINCIPLES OF INDIVIDUAL HORMONE PREPARATION OF THE ENDOMETRIUM IN PATIENTS WITH IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION FAILURES


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To study the morphological characteristics of structural features in the superficial epithelium and the receptor status of the endometrium in patients with repeated implantation failures in the assisted reproductive technology programs, to elaborate prognostic criteria for the occurrence of pregnancy in them, and to identify groups of patients who are to have cyclic hormonal therapy as endometrial preparation for the following in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. Subjects and methods. The study enrolled 97 reproductive-age patients with tuboperitoneal infertility and a history of 2 IVF failures or more. At its f irst stage, 2 comparison groups were formed in accordance with the efficiency of IVF procedures: 1) 15 patients in whom pregnancy had occurred; 2) 47 negative-pregnant women. These patients underwent Pipelle endometrial biopsy in the cycle before superovulatory induction on days 7-8 postovulation. At the second stage, Group 3 consisting of 35 patients with lower steroid receptivity was formed in accordance with the data of immunohistochemical studies. They were given hormonal therapy as preparation for the following procedure of IVF and embryo transfer. Group 3 patients treated with hormone drugs also underwent control biopsy on days 21-24 of a menstrual cycle. A control group included 15 fertile women without gynecologic pathology in whom the endometrial structure was examined. While studying the histological specimens, the percentage of superficial epithelial cells with pinopodia was calculated using a light microscopy at x400. A histology H-score was used to analyze immunohistochemical findings. The expression of estrogen receptor-α (ER-α) and progesterone receptor (PR) was estimated in scores. The data were statistically processed using the Statistica for Windows (version 7.0) software package (StatSoft Inc.). Results. The major favorable prognostic criteria for IVF pregnancy is the PR/ER-α ratio that is concordant with the endometrial morphological structure and superficial endometrial cells with pinopodia (≥50%) in the endometrium and the most unfavorable prognostic marker is persistent ER-α hyperexpression in the midluteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Conclusion. Cyclic hormonal therapy with natural estradiol and natural micronized progesterone in patients with the lower receptor status can normalize the structural and functional status of the endometrium and the formation of adequate morphological reactions of the superf icial epithelium, by enhancing the expression of PR and ER-α.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

E. V DYUZHEVA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

Email: L_kuzmichyov@oparina4.ru

E. A KOGAN

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

E. A. KALININA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

L. N KUZMICHEV

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

Email: L_kuzmichyov@oparina4.ru

References

  1. Ашхаб М.Х. Молекулярные основы анапластических изменений эпителия в эндометрии. // Автореф. дис.. канд. мед. наук. - Москва. - 2003. - С. 26.
  2. Бессмертная В.С., Самойлов М.В., Серебренникова К.Г., Бабиченко И.И. Морфологические и иммуногистохимические особенности эндометрия у женщин с первичным и вторичным бесплодием // Архив патологии. - 2008. - № 4. - С. 31-34.
  3. Гузов И.И. Введение в медицину репродукции. Зачатие у человека. Стероидные гормоны и другие медиаторы имплантации. Введение в рецепторологию. 2002; Режим доступа: http://www.center reproduction.ru. -Загл. с экрана.
  4. Лысенко О.Н., Ашхаб М.Х., Стрижова Н.В., Бабиченко И.И. Иммуногистохимические исследования экспрессии рецепторов к стероидным гормонам при гиперпластических процессах в эндометрии // Архив патологии - 2004. - № 2. - С. 7-10.
  5. Побединский Н.М., Балтуцкая О.И., Омельяненко А.И. Стероидные рецепторы нормального эндометрия // Акушерство и гинекология. - 2000. - № 3. - С. 5-8.
  6. Судома И.А., Маслий Ю.В. Алгоритм обследования и лечения пациентов с многократными неудачными программами ВРТ // Казань, Репродуктивные технологии сегодня и завтра. - 2007. - С. 20-21.
  7. Achache H., Revel А. Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation // Hum. Reprod. Update. - 2006. - Vol. 12. - P. 731-746.
  8. Coutifaris C., Myers E.R., Guzick D.S. et al. Histological dating of timed endometrial biopsy tissue is not related to fertility status // Fertil. Steril. - 2004. - Vol. 82. -P. 1264-1272.
  9. Donaghay M., Lessey B.A. Uterine receptivity: alterations associated with benign gynecological disease // Semin. Reprod. Med. - 2007. - Vol. 25. - P. 461-475.
  10. Gregory C.W., Wilson E.M., Apparao K.B. et al. Steroid receptor coactivator expression throughout the menstrual cycle in normal and abnormal endometrium // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. - 2002. - Vol. 87. - P. 2960-2966.
  11. Kodaman P.H., Taylor H.S. Hormonal regulation of implantation // Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. N. Am. - 2004. -Vol. 31. - P. 745-766.
  12. Ledee-Bataille N., Lapree-Delage G., Taupin J.L. et al. Concentration of leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) in uterine flushing fluid is highly predictive of embryo implantation // Hum. Reprod. - 2002. - Vol. 17. - P. 213-218.
  13. Lessey B.A., Palomino W.A., Apparao K.B. et al. Estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-alpha) and defects in uterine receptivity in women // Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. - 2006. -Vol. 4 (suppl. 1). - Р. 9.
  14. Levin E.R. Membrane ERα signaling to cell functions // The journal of physiology. - 2009: ellis.levin@med.va.gov.
  15. Mazur M.T., Kurman R.J. Diagnostic of endometrial biopsies and curreting. A clinical approach. Spinger, 2005.
  16. Mertens H.J.M.M., Heineman M.J., Theuissen P.H.M.H. et al. Androgen, estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in the human uterus during the menstrual cycle // Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. - 2001. - Vol. 98. - P. 58-65.
  17. Myers E. R., Silva S., Barnhart K. et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the histological dating of the endometrium in fertile and infertile women // Fertil. Steril. - 2004. - Vol. 82. - P. 1278-1282.
  18. Nikas G. Endometrial receptivity: changes in cell-surface morphology // Semin. Reprod. Med. - 2000. - Vol. 18. -P. 229-236.
  19. Ola B., Li T.-C. Implantation failure following in-vitro fertilization // Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. - 2006. -Vol. 18. - P. 440-445.
  20. Quinn C.E., Casper R.F. Pinopodes: a queslionable role in endometrial receptivity // Hum. Reprod. Update - 2009. -Vol. 15. - P. 229-236.
  21. Simon C., Moreno C., Remohi J., Pellicer A. Cytokines and embryo implantation // J. Reprod. Immunol. - 1998. -Vol. 39. - P. 117-131.
  22. Talbi S., Hamilton A.E., Vo K.C. et al. Molecular phenotyping of human endometrium distinquishes menstrual cycle phases and underlying biological processes in normo-ovulatory women // Endocrinology. - 2006. - Vol. 147. -P. 1097-1121.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies