CLINICAL VALUE OF THE IMPAIRED CIRCADIAN BLOOD PRESSURE PROFILE IN PREGNANT WOMEN; POSSIBILITIES FOR DRUG PREVENTION OF GESTATIONAL HYPERTENSIVE COMPLICATIONS


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Objective: to ascertain the clinical value of the impaired circadian blood pressure (BP) prof ile and to determine the possibilities of drug prevention of hypertensive complications in pregnant women. Subjects and methods. The trial enrolled 377 pregnant women aged 18 to 42 years (mean 28 years) with different forms of arterial hypertension (AH), who were allocated to 4 groups: pregnant women with chronic AH (CAH); those with baseline normal BP, who developed gestational AH (GAH) or preeclampsia (PE) after 20 weeks’ gestation; and those in whom the signs of PE were added to CAH (CAH+PE). At the end of the first trimester, in the second (20—22 weeks) and third (30—32 weeks) ones, the pregnant women underwent clinical and laboratory studies, 24-hour BP monitoring, and echocardiography. The outcomes of pregnancy and labor were retrospectively analyzed. Results. Gestational hypertensive complications develop gradually after the stage of autonomic and metabolic abnormalities, endothelial dysfunction, and vasodilatation deficiency, which manifest themselves as the higher values of peripheral vascular resistance and diastolic pressure, and impaired circadian rhythm of BP with its insufficient nocturnal lowering. Conclusion. The detection of the early markers of GAH and PE makes it possible to use the period of preclinical changes in the regulation of the cardiovascular system to implement measures for their correction. By taking into account the data on the specific features of the micro- and macroelement status in pregnant women and on magnesium deficiency before hypertensive complications, magnesium preparations (magnerot) can be regarded as possible therapy at this stage.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

N. RUNIKHINA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

Email: n_runihina@oparina4.ru

N. SHARASHKINA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

B. BART

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

O. TKACHEVA

State Research Center for Preventive Medicine

Bibliografia

  1. Макро- и микроэлементный статус при беременности. // Ткачева О.Н., Громова О.А., Мишина И.Е. и др. — М.: Медпрактика-М, 2007.
  2. Метаболизм магния и терапевтическое значение его препаратов. // Школьникова М.А., Чупрова С.Н., Калинин Л.А. и др. — М.: Медпрактика-М, 2004.
  3. Мишина И.Е., Громова О.А., Полятыкина Т.С., Андреева С.В. Особенности микроэлементного статуса беременных с артериальной гипертензией // Бюл. Восточно-Сибирского научного центра РАМН. — 2006. — № 1. — С. 86-91.
  4. Остроумова О.Д., Степура О.Б., Мельник О.О. Пролапс митрального клапана — норма или патология? // Рус. мед. журн. — 2002. — № 28.
  5. Остроумова О.Д., Шаркова Н.Е. Дизэлектролитные расстройства и сердечно-сосудистые заболевания. Дефицит магния в патогенезе артериальной гипертонии — новая мишень для терапии? // Рус.мед. журн. — 2003. — № 15.
  6. Стрюк Р.И., Ткачева О.Н., Рунихина Н.К. и др. Диагностика и лечение сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний при беременности. Российские рекомендации. Разработаны комитетом экспертов ВНОК// Кардиоваскуляр. тер. и профилактика. — 2010. — Т. 9, № 6. — Прил. 2.
  7. Ткачева О.Н., Барабашкина А.В. Актуальные вопросы патогенеза, диагностики и фармакотерапии артериальной гипертонии у беременных — М.: ПАГРИ, 2006.
  8. Adam B., Malatyaloglu E., Alvur M., Talu C. Magnasium, zinc and iron levels in pre-eclampsia // J. Mater. Fetal Med. — 2001. — Vol. 10, № 4. — Р 146—150.
  9. Amash A., Holcberg G., Sheiner E. et al. Magnesium sulfate normalizes placental interleukin-6 secretion in preeclampsia // J. Interferon. Cytokine Res. — 2010. — Vol. 30, № 9. — Р. 683—690.
  10. Ariza A.C., Bobadilla N.A., Halhali A. Endothelin 1 and angiotensin II in preeeclampsia // Rev. Invest. Clin. — 2007. — Vol. 59, № 1. — P. 48—56.
  11. Baszak E., Baszak J., Sikorski R., Radomanski T. Nocturnal fall of blood pressure in the first half of pregnancy // Ginekol. Pol. — 2001. —Vol. 72, № 12A. — P. 1582—1587.
  12. Bouchlariotou S., Liakopoulos V., Dovas S. et al. Nocturnal hypertension is associated with an exacerbation of the endothelial damage in preeclampsia // Am. J. Nephrol. — 2007. — Vol. 28, № 3. — P. 424—430.
  13. Brown M., Bowyer L., McHugh L. Twenty-four-hour automated blood pressure monitoring as a predictor of preeclampsia // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. — 2001. — Vol. 185, № 3. — P. 618—622.
  14. Classen H.G. Magnesium orotate-experimental and clinical evidence // Rom. J. Intern. Med. — 2004. — Vol. 42, № 3. — Р 491—501.
  15. Coetzee E.J., Dommisse J., Anthony J. A randomized controlled trial of intravenous magnesium sulphate versus placebo in the management of women with severe pre-eclampsia // Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. — 1998. — Vol. 105, № 3. — Р. 300—303.
  16. Cuspidi C., Giudici V., Negri F. et al. Left ventricular geometry, ambulatory blood pressure and extra-cardiac organ damage in untreated essential hypertension // Blood Press. Monit. — 2010. — Vol. 15, № 3. — P. 124—131.
  17. Dawson E.B., Evans D.R., Kelly R. et al. Blood cell lead, calcium, and magnesium levels associated with pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia // Biol. Trace Elem. Res. — 2000. — Vol. 74, № 2. — Р 107—116.
  18. Fagard R.H., Celis H., Thijs L. et al. Daytime and nighttime blood pressure as predictors of death and cause-specific cardiovascular events in hypertension // Hypertension. — 2008. — Vol. 51, № 1. — P. 55—61.
  19. Garcia-Ortiz L., Gomez-Marcos M.A., Martin-Moreiras J. et al. Pulse pressure and nocturnal fall in blood pressure are predictors of vascular, cardiac and renal target organ damage in hypertensive patients (LOD-RISK study) // Blood Press. Monit. — 2009. — Vol. 14, № 4. — P. 145—151.
  20. Hermida R., Ayala D. Evaluation of the blood pressure load in the diagnosis of hypertension in pregnanc // Hypertension. — 2001. — Vol. 38, № 3, pt2. — P. 723—729.
  21. Kisters K., Barenbrock M., Louwen F. et al. Membrane, intracellular, and plasma magnesium and calcium concentrations in preeclampsia // Am. J. Hypertens. — 2000. — Vol. 13, № 7. — Р. 765—769.
  22. Larry C., Yeo S. The circadian rtythm of blood pressure during pregnancy // J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonat.. Nurs. — 2000. — Vol. 29, № 5. — P. 500—508.
  23. The Magpie Trial Collaborative Group. Do women with pre-eclamosia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The Mapie Trial: a randomized placebo-controlled trial // Lancet. — 2002. — Vol. 359, № 9321. — Р 1877—1890.
  24. Moslemizade N., Rafiei A., Yazdani F. et al. The effect of magnesium sulfate on bleeding time and nitric oxide production in preeclamsia // Pak. J. Biol. Sci. — 2011. — Vol. 14, № 2. — Р. 106—111.
  25. Novelli G.P., Valensise H., Vasapollo B. et al. Left ventricular concentric geometry as a risk factor in gestational hypertension // Hypertension. — 2003. — Vol. 41, № 3. — P. 469—475.
  26. O’Brien E., Asmar R., Beilin L. et al. European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring. European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement // J. Hypertens. — 2003. — Vol. 21. — P. 821—848.
  27. Qi Q., Li W., Wang Z. Magnesium and calcium concentration of peripheral serum and mononuclear cells in patients with pregnancy induced hypertension // Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. — 1997. — Vol. 32, № 1. — Р 15—18.
  28. Shah D.M. Preeclampsia: new insights // Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. — 2007. — Vol. 16, № 3. — P. 213—220.
  29. Sibai B.M., Barton J.R. Expectant management of severe preeclampsia remote from term: patient selection, treatment, and delivery indications // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. — 2007. — Vol. 196. — P. 514; 511—519.
  30. Staessen J.A., AsmarR. De Buyzere M. et al. Participants of the 2001 Consensus conference on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring. Task Force II: blood pressure measurement and cardiovascular outcome // Blood Press. Monit. - 2001. -Vol. 6, № 6. - P. 355-370.
  31. Tranquilli A., Giannubilo S., Dell'Uomo B., Corradetti A. Prediction of gestational hypertension or intrauterine fetal growth restriction by mid-trimester 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring // Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. - 2004. -Vol. 85, № 2. - P. 126-131.
  32. Vasapollo B., Novelli G.P., Valensise H. Total vascular resistance and left ventricular morphology as screening tools for complications in pregnancy // Hypertension. - 2008. -Vol. 51, № 4. - P. 1020-1026.
  33. Verdecchia P., Clement D., Fagard R. et al. Blood Pressure Monitoring. Task force III: Target-organ damage, morbidity and mortality // Blood Press. Monit. - 1999. - Vol. 4, № 6. -P. 303-317.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Bionika Media, 2011

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies