PREDICTION OF PREMATURE LABOR IN WOMEN WITH A HISTORY OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY MISCARRIAGE


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To study factors influencing premature delivery in women with a history of recurrent miscarriage (RM) and varying reproductive onset and to evaluate their infants’ health status in the course of an early neonatal period. Subjects and methods. Medical histories, the specific features of reproductive function, the course of pregnancy, labor, placental histology, and neonatal health status were analyzed in 266 women with a history of RM, who gave birth at the Research Institute of Maternal and Infant Care in 2004—2009. During the study, according to the principle of reproductive onset, the women were divided into 2 groups: those with primary and secondary RM (PRM and SRM). Results. Based on the f indings, the authors revealed predictors of preterm birth for each group. These for PRM were chronic intrauterine infection, markers of undifferentiated maternal connective tissue dysplasia, severe preeclampsia, fetal growth retardation syndrome and missed abortion in the history. These for SRM were preterm birth in the history, placental insufficiency, severe preeclampsia, placenta previa in the examined pregnancy, and patient cardiovascular diseases. Conclusion. Incorporation of dydrogesterone into the combination therapy for threatened miscarriage in women with RM can reduce the rate of its persistent risk and has a protective effect on the determinants of preterm delivery in the patients of these groups and on the early neonatal adaptation of their newborn infants.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

N. V BASHMAKOVA

Ural Research Institute of Maternal and Infant Care, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

E. A VINOKUROVA

Ural Research Institute of Maternal and Infant Care, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

Email: kontur.ovk@mail.ru

O. A KRAYEVA

Ural Research Institute of Maternal and Infant Care, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

References

  1. Беспалова О.Н. Генетика невынашивания беременности // Журн. акуш. и жен. бол. — 2007. — № 1. — С. 81-95.
  2. Земцовский Э.В. Диспластические фенотипы // Земцовский Э.В. Диспластическое сердце. — СПб., 2007. — С. 15—80.
  3. Милованов А.П., Серова О.Ф. Причины и дифференцированное лечение раннего невынашивания беременности: Руководство для врачей. — М.: МДВ, 2011.
  4. Радзинский В.Е., Запертова Е.Ю., Миронов А.В. Прогнозы лечения невынашивания беременности в I триместре прогестагенами // Гинекология. — 2006. — № 4. — С. 456—458.
  5. Фролова О.Г., Пугачева Т.Н., Гудимова В.В. Статистика перинатального периода //Акуш. и гин. — 2005. — № 5. — С. 36—38.
  6. Haas D.M., Ramsey P.S. Progestagen for preventing miscarriage // Cochrane Database Syst.Rev. — 2008. — Vol. 16, № 2. — P. 1023—1034.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2012 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies