A RELATIONSHIP OF THE RESULTS OF SUPEROVULATION INDUCTION AND THE NUMBER OF EMBRYOS OBTAINED WITHIN AN IN VITRO FERTILIZATION PROGRAM TO THE TYPE OF CHROMOSOME ABERRATION IN THE KARYOTYPE OF A PATIENT


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To estimate an ovarian response to superovulation induction and the period of early embryogenesis in the married couples with one being a carrier of balanced karyotype translocation in relation to its type. Subjects and methods. The investigation enrolled 27 married couples with one being a balanced translocation carrier. All the couples were included into an in vitro fertilization (IVF) program. Results. Analysis of the f indings indicated that there was no relationship between the type of mutation and that of (primary or secondary) infertility. A group of patients with Robertsonian translocations was shown to have a statistically significantly larger number of oocytes (р=0.00037) and embryos (р=0.00149) than that of patients who were reciprocal translocation carriers. The couples where the women were mutation carriers showed no statistically significant difference in the number of obtained oocytes and embryos as compared to the couples where the men were mutation carriers. At the same time the mean number of good-quality embryos on day 3 of development in the couples with female and male mutation was 2.57±2.44 and 3.85±1.87, respectively (p=0.0194, Mann-Whitney test). The group of reciprocal translocation carriers showed the same gender-based tendency: fewer oocytes and embryos were obtained in the couples with female mutation carriers. In that of Robertsonian translocation carriers, the obtained oocytes were fewer and the obtained embryos were more in the couples with male mutations carriers.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

V. G MIKAYELYAN

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

Email: v_mikaelyan@oparina4.ru

Zh. I GLINKINA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

N. V DOLGUSHINA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

L. B KINDAROVA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

N. A BELYAEVA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

Z. M GUBAYEVA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

S. A SOKUR

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

I. V NASKHLETASHVILI

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

E. A KALININA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia

References

  1. Кулешов Н.П. Частота возникновения и судьба хромосомных аномалий в популяции человека: Автореф. дис.. д-ра мед. наук. — М., 1979.
  2. Курило Л.Ф., Дубинская В.П., Остроумова Т.В. и др. Оценка сперматогенеза по незрелым половым клеткам эякулята // Пробл. репрод. — 1995. — Т. 1, № 3. — С. 33—38.
  3. Приказ Минздрава РФ от 26 февраля 2003 г. № 67 «О применении вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий (ВРТ) в терапии женского и мужского бесплодия». — M. 2003.
  4. Causio F., Fischetto R., Schonauer L.M. et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in infertile patients with structural cytogenetic abnormalities // J. Reprod. Med. — 1999. — Vol. 44, № 10. — Р. 859—864.
  5. Chen S., Escudero T., Cekleniak N. et al. Patterns of ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation in female carriers of balaced translocation // Fertil. Steril. — 2005. — Vol. 83, № 5. — Р. 1504—1509.
  6. Dechanet C., Castelli C., Reyftmann L. et al. Do female translocation influence the ovarian response pattern to controlled ovarian stimulation in preimplantation genetic diagnosis? // Hum. Reprod. — 2011. — Vol. 26, № 5. — Р. 1232—1240.
  7. Fridstrom M., Ahrlund-Richter L., Iwarsson E. et al. Clinical outcome of treatment cycles using preimplantation genetic diagnosis for structural chromosomal abnormalities // Prenat. Diagn. — 2001. — Vol. 21. — Р. 781—787.
  8. Jacobs P.A., Melville M., Ratcliffe S. et al. Cytogenetic survey of 11680 newborn infants // Ann. Hum. Genet. — 1974. — Vol. 37, № 4. — Р. 359—376.
  9. Nielsen J., Wohlert M. Chromosome abnormalities among 34.910 newborn children: results from a 13-year incidence study in Arthus, Denmark // Hum. Genet. — 1991. — Vol. 87, № 1. — Р. 81—83.
  10. Thompson M. Genetics in medicine. — Philadelphia: Sauders, — 1991. — Р. 47—52.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies