CURRENT SURGICAL TREATMENT IN PUERPERAS WITH UTERINE SCAR DEHISCENCE FOLLOWING CESAREAN DELIVERY AND WITH OBSTETRIC PERITONITIS
- Authors: KURTSER M.A1, LOKTEVA T.S2, PODTETENEV A.D2
-
Affiliations:
- Center for Family Planning and Reproduction, Moscow Healthcare Department
- City Clinical Hospital Thirty-Six, Moscow Healthcare Department
- Issue: No 8-2 (2012)
- Pages: 28-32
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/246858
- ID: 246858
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
Objective. To improve the outcomes of treatment for obstetric peritonitis following cesarean delivery, by performing organ-saving treatment andpathogenetically warranted intensive therapy in the postpartum period. Subjects and methods. Twenty-two clinical cases with peritonitis underwent organ-saving surgery with metroplasty and application of secondary sutures to the uterus. Results. The authors discuss management tactics for puerperas with obstetric peritonitis developing in the presence of inconsistent uterine sutures and current criteria for the examination and treatment of these patients. They show the needfor using procalcitonin, leukocyte index of intoxication, and integral scales of organ dysfunctions in the algorithm of examination of puerperas with obstetric peritonitis. Conclusion. The current approaches to surgical treatment and starting antibacterial therapy with ultrabroad-spectrum antibiotics in combination with early intensive therapy in an intensive care unit make it possible to avoid removal of the uterus as a primary focus.
Full Text
About the authors
M. A KURTSER
Center for Family Planning and Reproduction, Moscow Healthcare Department
Email: сfp@list.ru
T. S LOKTEVA
City Clinical Hospital Thirty-Six, Moscow Healthcare Department
Email: tatakotomina@mail.ru
A. D PODTETENEV
City Clinical Hospital Thirty-Six, Moscow Healthcare Department
Email: and_ptt@mail.ru
References
- Кэмпбелл Ст., Лиза К., ред. Акушерство от десяти учителей: Пер. с англ. 17-е изд. М.: МИА; 2004. 464 с.
- Белобородова Н.В., Попов Д.А. Тест на прокальцитонин: алгоритмы применения и новые возможности: Пособие для врачей. М.; 2008. 74 с.
- Горин В.С., Серов В.Н., Бирюкова Л.А., Степанов В.В. Оптимизация диагностики и лечения послеродового эндометрита. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2009; 1: 21-9.
- Кальф-Калиф Я.Я. О лейкоцитарном индексе интоксикации и его практическом значении. Врачебное дело. 1941; 1: 31-3.
- Савельев В.С., Гельфанд Б.Р, ред. Сепсис в начале XXI века. Классификация, клинико-диагностическая концепция и лечение. Паталого-анатомическая диагностика: Практическое руководство. М.: Литтерра; 2006. 176 с.
- Серов В.Н. Пути снижения материнской смертности в Российской Федерации. Журнал Российского общества акушеров-гинекологов. 2008; 3: 3-6.
- Черемискин В.П. Диагностика послеродовых гнойно-септических осложнений с определением уровня прокальцито-нина в крови. Медицинский альманах. 2009; 4 (9): 143-5.
- Burrows L.J., Meyn L.A., Weber A.M. Maternal morbidity associated with vaginal versus cesarian delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004; 103(5, Pt. 1): 907-12.
- Levy M.M., Fink M.P., Marshall J.C., Abraham E, Angus D., Cook D. et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP ATS/SIS International sepsis definitions conference. Crit. Care Med. 2003; 31(4): 1250-6.
- NygaardI., CruikshankD.P. Should all women be offered elective cesarean delivery? Obstet. Gynecol. 2003; 102(2): 217-9.
Supplementary files
