A CASE OF A COMBINATION OF LOW-QUALITY OOCYTES AND UTERINE AND VAGINAL MALFORMATIONS IN A PATIENT WITH NORMAL OVARIAN MORPHOFUNCTIONAL PARAMETERS


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The data available in the literature on the cause and duration of a negative impact on oocytes and sperm, which induce future embryo fragmentation, are extremely discrepant. The given paper describes a clinical case. Case. Four in vitro fertilization (IVF) programs were implemented in Patient N. aged 36 years. Examination established that uterine and vaginal malformations were the only abnormality. Superovulation was induced using different gonadotropins in combination with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists. In the four IVF programs, the average of 8.2±2.1 oocytes was obtained from the patient. Of them, fertilization and fragmentation were observed in an average of 7.0±1.8 oocytes and 6.7±1.5 embryos, respectively. However, all the cases exhibited marked embryo fragmentation (from 30 to 100%) with the first cleavage division. The patient was transferred in three embryos on day 3 with the minimal (30%) level of fragmentation. Two of the four IVF programs failed; the other two resulted in ectopic pregnancy and non-developing pregnancy at 6-7 weeks, respectively. Conclusion. Taking into account the fact that the formation of a pool of primary germ cells and the development of internal genital organs occur before day 32 of embryogenesis, the negative impact on the embryo during this period may give rise to a combination of low-quality oocytes and uterine and vaginal malformations. The given case report suggests that defective oocytes should be expected in patients with uterine and vaginal malformations.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. G ABDULMEDZHIDOVA

OAO Meditsina Clinic, Moscow

Email: anisat2011@gmail.com

S. A ZVEREVA

OAO Meditsina Clinic, Moscow

Email: zvereva2010@mail.ru

N. O NADYROVA

OAO Meditsina Clinic, Moscow

Email: nno55@mail.ru

References

  1. Fujimoto V.Y., Browne R.W., Bloom M.S., Sakkas D., Alikani M. Pathogenesis, developmental consequences, and clinical correlations of human embryo fragmentation. Fertil. Steril. 2011; 95(4): 1197-204.
  2. Xue L., Cheng L., Su G, Kang F., Wu X., Bai C. et al. Nuclear transfer procedures in the ovine can induce early embryo fragmentation and compromise cloned embryo development. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2011; 126(3-4): 179-86.
  3. Mio Y., Maeda K. Time-lapse cinematography of dynamic changes occurring during in vitro development of human embryos. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008; 199(6): 660; e1-5.
  4. Antunes G., Chaveiro A., Santos P., Marques A., Jin H.S., Moreira da Silva F. Influence of apoptosis in bovine embryo’s development. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2010; 45(1): 26-32.
  5. Hannoun A., Ghaziri G., Abu Musa A., Zreik T.G., Hajameh F., Awwad J. Addition of sphingosine-1-phosphate to human oocyte culture medium decreases embryo fragmentation. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2010; 20(3): 328-34.
  6. Ramalho-Santos J., Varum S., Amaral S., Mota P.C., Sousa A.P., Amaral A. Mitochondrial functionality in reproduction: from gonads and gametes to embryos and embryonic stem cells. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2009; 15(5): 553-72.
  7. Alikani M., Schimmel T., Willadsen S.M. Cytoplasmic fragmentation in activated eggs occurs in the cytokinetic phase of the cell cycle, in lieu of normal cytokinesis, and in response to cytoskeletal disorder. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2005; 11(5): 335-44.
  8. Черешнев В.А. Фармакологическое регулирование программированной гибели клеток. СПб.: Наука; 2011.255с.
  9. Sakkas D., Alvarez J.G. Sperm DNA fragmentation: mechanisms of origin, impact on reproductive outcome, and analysis. Fertil. Steril. 2010; 93(4): 1027-36.
  10. Nielsen H.S., Witvliet M.D., Steffensen R., Haasnoot G.W, Goulmy E., Christiansen O.B., Claas F. The presence of HLA-antibodies in recurrent miscarriage patients is associated with a reduced chance of a live birth. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010; 87(1): 67-73.
  11. Adriaenssens T., Wathlet S., Segers I., Verheyen G., De Vos A., Van der Elst J. et al. Cumulus cell gene expression is associated with oocyte developmental quality and influenced by patient and treatment characteristics. Hum. Reprod. 2010; 25(5): 1259-70.
  12. Yoldemir T. Does the duration of gonadotropin stimulation affect embryo quality on post-retrieval day 3? Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2011; 27(5): 324-30.
  13. Ziebe S., Bangsb0ll S., Schmidt K.L., Loft A., Lindhard A., Nyboe Andersen A. Embryo quality in natural versus stimulated IVF cycles. Hum. Reprod. 2004; 19(6): 1457-60.
  14. Ziebe S., Lundin K., Janssens R., Helmgaard L., Arce J.C.; MERIT (Menotrophin vs Recombinant FSH in vitro Fertilisation Trial) Group. Influence of ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or recombinant FSH on embryo quality parameters in patients undergoing IVF. Hum. Reprod. 2007; 22(9): 2404-13.
  15. Magli M.C., Gianaroli L. Ferraretti A.P., Lappi M., Ruberti A., Farfalli V. Embryo morphology and development are dependent on the chromosomal complement. Fertil. Steril. 2007; 87(3): 534-41.
  16. Alikani M., Tomkin G., Ferry K., Garrisi M. High pregnancy loss rate following implantation of IVF human embryos with extensive fragmentation. Fertil. Steril. 2008; 90(Suppl.): S113-4.
  17. Милованов А.П., Савельев С.В., ред. Внутриутробное развитие человека: Руководство для врачей. М.: МДВ; 2006. 384с.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies