HARDWARE AUTOERYTHROCYTE REINFUSION DURING ABDOMINAL DELIVERY


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Hardware intraoperative autoerythrocyte reinfusion (IAR) is one of the most important blood conservation techniques used in bleeding during abdominal delivery. Objective. To evaluate the efficiency and safety of hardware autoerythrocyte reinfusion during cesarean section. Subject and methods. A study group consisted of 140 pregnant women who had intraoperatively undergone IAR using a Cell-saver 5+; in 30 women of them, IAR was combined with autoplasma transfusion. The delivery times were 32-38 weeks. The investigation used clinical and laboratory studies (hemograms, biochemical parameters, hemostasiological parameters before and at 1 and 5 days after surgery. Infusion-transfusion therapy and postoperative complications were analyzed. To determine blood loss volume, the investigators automatically used methods, such as visual, gravimetric ones using the Libov formula and Cell-saver readings. The risk of more than 20% circulating blood volume loss is an indication for the use of blood conservation techniques in pregnant women. Results. The volume of blood loss during cesarean section ranged from 800 to 3100 ml, averaging 1460.51±115.32 ml. That of reinfused autoerythrocytes varied from 250 to 1650 ml, averaging 644.79±64.42 ml. Massive hemorrhage was shown to occur during cesarean delivery, myomectomy, placental abruption, placenta previa et accreta, and severe preeclampsia, which requires the mandatory use of intraoperative IAR. Peripheral blood examination at 1 and 5 postoperative days indicated that the levels of hemoglobin, packed cell volume, and red blood cells were high enough even in puerperas with massive and supermassive blood loss. Severe anemia was seen in none of the women. Investigation of coagulation and anticoagulation factors revealed that the reinfused suspension of washed autoerythrocytes had no negative effect on the balance of coagulation and anticoagulation processes. Determination of the levels of urea, creatinine, and bilirubin in the puerperas failed to reveal their significant elevation after IAR. No complications were observed in any case after 140 sessions of autoerythrocyte reinfusion during cesarean section. Conclusion. When the specially-trained and certified personnel follows the technology of IAR in obstetrics, it is safe and effective and should be carried out if the expected circulating blood volume loss is over 20%. IAR avoids the use of donor red blood cells even in patients with massive blood loss, which can circumvent massive blood transfusions and considerably improve a postoperative period.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

T. A FEDOROVA

Academician V. I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: t_fyodorova@oparina4.ru

O. V ROGACHEVSKY

Academician V. I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: o_rogachevskiy@oparina4.ru

T. K PUCHKO

Academician V. I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: t_puchko@oparina4.ru

T. V BULYNINA

Academician V. I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: t_bulynina@oparina4.ru

K. G BYKOVA

Academician V. I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: k_bykova@oparina4.ru

References

  1. Кулаков В.И., Серов В.Н., Абубакирова А.М. Клиническая трансфузиология в акушерстве, гинекологии и неонатологии. М.: Триада-Х; 2001. 205с.
  2. Bonnar J. Massive obstetric haemorrhage. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2000; 14(1): 1—18.
  3. Carroli G., Cuesta C., Abalos E., Gulmezoglu A.M. Epidemiology of post-partum haemorrhage: a systematic review. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2008; 22(6): 999—1012.
  4. Жибурт Е.Б. Безопасное переливание крови. СПб.: Питер; 2000. 320с.
  5. Литманович К.Ю., Селиванов Е.А., Дуткевич И.Г. Проблемы безопасности и эффективности гемотрансфузионной терапии. Эфферентная терапия. 2000; 10(3): 37—47.
  6. Blajchman M.A., Vamvakas E.C. The continuing risk of transfusion-transmitted infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006; 355: 1303—5.
  7. May A.K., Kauder R.D. Rational use of blood products. In: Lanken P.N., ed. The intensive care unit manual. New York: Springer; 2001: 181—92.
  8. Reyal F., Sibony O., Oury J.F., Luton D., Bang J., Blot P. Criteria for transfusion in severe postpartum hemorrhage: analysis of practice and risk factors. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2004; 112(1): 61—4.
  9. Сухих Г.Т., Федорова Т.А., Рогачевский О.В., Фотеева Т.С., Стрельникова Е.В., Бакуридзе Э.М., Очан А.С. Аутоплазмодонорство в акушерстве. Медицинская технология. Регистр. № 2009/334. М.; 2009. 11с.
  10. Сухих Г.Т., Федорова Т.А., Рогачевский О.В., Сокологорский С.В., Фотеева Т.С., Стрельникова Е.В., Бакуридзе Э.М. Нормоволемическая гемодилюция с аутогемотрансфузией в акушерстве. Медицинская технология. Регистр. №2009/333. М.; 2009. 11с.
  11. Федорова Т.А., Рогачевский О.В. Кровесберегающие технологии в акушерской практике. Современные медицинские технологии. 2009; 2: 59—62.
  12. Федорова Т.А., Стрельникова Е.В., Рогачевский О.В., Данилов А.Ю. Применение инттраоперационной реинфузии аутоэритроцитов в акушерской практике. Акушерство и гинекология. 2010; 4: 23—7.
  13. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Intraoperative blood cell salvage in obstetrics. Information about NICE Interventional Procedure Guidance 144. 2005: 1—10.
  14. Louage S., Van de Velde M. Cell salvage in obstеtric anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol. Belg. 2010; 61(1): 13—24.
  15. Wise V.C. Challenges of major obstetric haemorrhage. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2010; 24: 353—65.
  16. Сухих Г.Т., Федорова Т.А., Рогачевский О.В., Фотеева Т.С., Стрельникова Е.В., Бакуридзе Э.М. Интраоперационная реинфузия аутологичных эритроцитов при абдоминальном родоразрешении. Медицинская технология. Регистр. №2009/329. М.; 2009. 12с.
  17. UK Cell Salvage Action Group. Indications and contraindications. In: UK Cell Salvage Action Group, ed. Intraoperative cells salvage: education workbook. London; 2008: 50—2.
  18. Liumbruno G.M., Liumbruno C., Rafanelli D. Intraoperative cell salvage in obstetrics: is it a real therapeutic option? Transfution. 2011; 51(10): 2244—56.
  19. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Prevention and management of postpartum haemorrhage. May 2009: 1-24 (Green-top guideline, no. 52).
  20. Баранов И.И. Акушерские кровотечения: гемотрансфузионные принципы профилактики и лечения: Дис.. д-ра мед. наук. М.; 1999. 226с.
  21. Henry D., Carless P., Moxey A., O’Connell D., Stokes B.J., McClelland B. et al. Antifibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogenic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2007; (4): CD001886.
  22. Sekhavat L., Tabatabaii A., Dalili M., Farajkhoda T., Tafti A.D. Efficacy of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss after caesarean section. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009; 22(1): 72—5.
  23. Stainsby D., MacLennan S., Thomas D., Isaac J., Hamilton P.J.; British Committee for Standards in Haematology. Guidelines on the management of massive blood loss. Br.J. Haematol. 2006; 135(5): 634—41.
  24. Teig M., Harkness M., Catling S., Clarke V. Survey of cell salvage use in obstetrics in the UK. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 2007; 16(Suppl.1): S30.
  25. Geoghegan J., Daniels J.P., Moore P.A., Thompson P.J., Khan K.S., Gülmezoglu A.M. Cell salvage at caesarean section: the need for an evidence-based approach. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2009; 116(6): 743—7.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies