PHARMACOTHERAPY FOR UNCOMPLICATED INFLAMMATORY DISEASES OF SMALL PELVIC ORGANS


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To study possibilities of application of combiflox (ornidazol 500 g + ofloxacin 200 mg) to treat uncomplicated small pelvic inflammatory diseases identified by a gynecologist during annual prophylactic examination. Subject and methods. Fifty-four reproductive-aged patients having signs of small pelvic inflammatory small pelvic inflammatory diseases were selected; of them 26 patients had predominant involvement of the vagina and cervix uteri, without the signs of a risk for ascending infection and 28 patients had evidence for inflammation of the uterus or its appendages in the presence of risk of disease complication. All the patients took the combination agent ornidazol + ofloxacin as 2 tablets daily for 7 to 14 days depending on the severity of disease symptoms. The effect was evaluated from clinical, ultrasound, and laboratory data; drug tolerance was assessed using the data of a questionnaire survey in patients and their subjective attitude towards treatment. Results. Among the reproductive-aged patients with signs of uncomplicated small pelvic inflammation, combiflox proved to be effective in 88.5% of cases and among those having risk factors for ascending infection in 75% of the patients. Three of the 54 patients were operated on because of the signs of formed tuboovarian mass and antibiotics were changed in 7 women who had no improvement for 5 days. There were no severe adverse manifestations due to the use of combiflox. All the women reported that the dosage form was easy-to-use. Conclusion. In the authors’ experience, combiflox is an effective agent for women with uncomplicated diseases of small pelvic organs as a combination of ornidazol and ofloxacin affects major microbial pathogens. The convenient formulation of the combined drug and its reasonable price allows high treatment compliance.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

S. A LEVAKOV

Institute of Advanced Training, Federal Biomedical Agency of Russia

Email: levakoff@yandex.ru

A. G KEDROVA

Institute of Advanced Training, Federal Biomedical Agency of Russia; Medical Sanitary Unit One Hundred and Seventy, Federal Biomedical Agency of Russia

Email: kedrova.anna@gmail.com

N. N CHELNOKOVA

Medical Sanitary Unit One Hundred and Seventy, Federal Biomedical Agency of Russia

Email: msd170@extern.rsce.ru

References

  1. Boughton B. Chlamydia screening guidelines miss some high-risk groups. American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) 60th Annual Clinical Meeting. San Diego, California , 9 may 2012.
  2. Hocking J.S., Guy R., Walker J., Tabrizi S.N. Advances in sampling and screening for chlamydia. Future Microbiol. 2013; 8(3): 367-86.
  3. Кедрова А.Г., Челнокова Н.Н., Левакова С.Е. Совершенствование качества диспансеризации молодых женщин с риском нарушений репродуктивной функции. В кн.: Материалы V научно-практической конференции акушеров-гинекологов ФМБА Россиии «Актуальные вопросы акушерства и гинекологии». Москва, 21-22 мая 2013.
  4. Taylor B.D., Darville T., Haggerty C.L. Does bacterial vaginosis cause pelvic inflammatory disease? Sex. Transm. Dis. 2013; 40(2): 117-22.
  5. Wiesenfeld H.C., Hillier S.L., Krohn M.A., Amortegui A.J., Heine R.P., Landers D.V., Sweet R.L. Lower genital tract infection and endometritis: insight into subclinical pelvic inflammatory disease. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002; 100(3): 456-63.
  6. Eckert L.O., Thwin S.S., Hillier S.L., Kiviat N.B., Eschenbach D.A. The antimicrobial treatment of subacute endometritis: a proof of concept study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004; 190(2): 305-13.
  7. Workowski K.A., Berman S.; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2010; 59 (RR-12): 1-110.
  8. Short V.L., Totten P.A., Ness R.B., Astete S.G., Kelsey S.F., Haggerty C.L. Clinical presentation of Mycoplasma genitali-um infection versus Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection among women with pelvic inflammatory disease. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009; 48(1): 41-7.
  9. Haggerty C.L., Totten P.A., Astete S.G., Ness R.B. Mycoplasma genitalium among women with nongonococcal, nonchlamydial pelvic inflammatory disease. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006; 2006: 30184.
  10. Bevan C.D., Ridgway G.L., Rothermel C.D. Efficacy and safety of azithromycin as monotherapy or combined with metronidazole compared with two standard multidrug regimens for the treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. J. Int. Med. Res. 2003; 31: 45-54.
  11. Kirkcaldy R., Augostini P., Asbel L. Trichomonas vaginalis antimicrobial drug resistance in 6 US cities. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2012; 18(6): 939-43.
  12. Bosserman E.A., Helms D.J., Mosure D.J., Secor W.E., Workowski K.A. Utility of antimicrobial susceptibility testing in Trichomonas vaginalis-infected women with clinical treatment failure. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2011; 38(10): 983-7.
  13. Sivapalasingam S., Steigbigel N.H. Macrolides, clindamcyin, and ketolides. In: Mandell G.L., Bennett J.E., Dolin R., eds. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2010: 442.
  14. Козаченко А.В., Тесленко И.В., Губский К.А., Нудьга А.Н., Ковалева Е.А. Cравнительная эффективность орнидазола и метронидазола у пациентов с гнойно-воспалительными заболеваниями органов брюшной полости. Медицина неотложных состаяний. 2012; 5(44): 56-62.
  15. White B.A., Creedon D.J., Nelson K.E., Wilson B.A. The vaginal microbiome in health and disease. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2011; 22(10): 389-93.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2013 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies