INCONSISTENT UTERINE SCAR AFTER CESAREAN SECTION: CAUSES OF FORMATION AND TREATMENT POLICY


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The distinguishing feature of present-day surgical obstetrics is the rising number of cesarean resections, the indication for which is an inconsistent uterine scar in more than 70% of cases. Objective. To analyze the outcomes of cesarean section (CS) at different postoperative stages. Subject and methods. A retrospective analysis was made in 479 patients after CS: in 52 puerperas after CS in the postpartum period (within 70 postoperative days), in 42 patients with a postcesarean section uterine scar when planning a next pregnancy, and in 385 pregnant women with a uterine scar after postcesarean section CS during full-term pregnancy. The uterine scar was evaluated from clinical and echoscopic findings. Results. The CS procedure, in particular a method for suturing the incision on the uterus, plays an important role in its scar formation. When individual musculomucosal sutures were used after the Eltsov-Strelkov method, the frequency of inconsistent scars was 38.5% (35/91); when individual musculomucosal sutures and an uninterrupted suture were applied to the uterine fascia proper, it was 13.2% (10/76); when the uterine incision was closed with one-two-layer uninterrupted sutures, inconsistent scars occurred in 95.4% of cases (105/110) and when uterine closure was done using a Reverden uninterrupted suture, they did in 95% (19/20). Conclusion. For the prevention of additional injury, the Gusakov-Zanchenko uterotomy should not be employed especially in CS during labor and delivery. To create the optimal conditions for forming a uterine suture/scar, it is expedient to close the incision with individual sutures, by using an absorbable synthetic suture material.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

V. L KRASNOPOLSKY

Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Email: guzmoniiag@gmail.com

L. S LOGUTOVA

Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Email: lidialogutova@mail.ru

S. N BUYANOVA

Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Email: buyanova-sn@mail.ru

References

  1. Hospitals in Europe Health Care. Data 1998-2008. Hope European Hospital and Healthcare Federation; 2009. 29 р.
  2. Patah L.E., Malik A.M. Models of childbirth care and cesarean rates in different countries. Rev. Saude Publica. 2011; 45(1): 185-94.
  3. World Health Statistics 2010. WHO; 2010. 177 p.
  4. Prapas N., Kalogiannidis I., Masoura S.,Diamanti E., Makedos A., Drossou D, Makedos G. Operative vaginal delivery in singleton term pregnancies: Shor-term maternal and neonatal outcomes. Hippokratia. 2009; 13(1): 41-5.
  5. Сухих Г.Т., Коган Е.А., Кесова М.И., Демура Т.А., Донников А.Е., Мартынов А.И. и др. Морфологические и молекулярно-генетические особенности неоангиогенеза в рубцовой ткани у пациенток с недифференцированной дисплазией соединительной ткани. Акушерство и гинекология. 2010; 6: 23-8.
  6. Сухих Г.Т., Донников А.Е., Кесова М.И., Кан Н.Е., Амирасланов Э.Ю., Климанцев И.В. и др. Оценка состояния рубца матки с помощью математического моделирования на основании клинических и молекулярногенетических предикторов. Акушерство и гинекология. 2013; 1: 33-40.
  7. Радзинский В.Е., Есипова А.Н., Вученович Ю.В. Аргоноплазменная коагуляция тканей при кесаревом сечении. Акушерство и гинекология. 2010; 6: 28-30.
  8. Чурганова А.А. Применение фибринового криопреципитата при операции кесарево сечение и его влияние на морфофункциональную полноценность рубца на матке: Автореф. дис.. канд. мед. наук. М.; 2013. 24 с.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2013 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies