INCONSISTENT UTERINE SCAR AFTER CESAREAN SECTION: CAUSES OF FORMATION AND TREATMENT POLICY
- Authors: KRASNOPOLSKY V.L1, LOGUTOVA L.S1, BUYANOVA S.N1
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Issue: No 12 (2013)
- Pages: 28-33
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/247073
- ID: 247073
Cite item
Abstract
The distinguishing feature of present-day surgical obstetrics is the rising number of cesarean resections, the indication for which is an inconsistent uterine scar in more than 70% of cases. Objective. To analyze the outcomes of cesarean section (CS) at different postoperative stages. Subject and methods. A retrospective analysis was made in 479 patients after CS: in 52 puerperas after CS in the postpartum period (within 70 postoperative days), in 42 patients with a postcesarean section uterine scar when planning a next pregnancy, and in 385 pregnant women with a uterine scar after postcesarean section CS during full-term pregnancy. The uterine scar was evaluated from clinical and echoscopic findings. Results. The CS procedure, in particular a method for suturing the incision on the uterus, plays an important role in its scar formation. When individual musculomucosal sutures were used after the Eltsov-Strelkov method, the frequency of inconsistent scars was 38.5% (35/91); when individual musculomucosal sutures and an uninterrupted suture were applied to the uterine fascia proper, it was 13.2% (10/76); when the uterine incision was closed with one-two-layer uninterrupted sutures, inconsistent scars occurred in 95.4% of cases (105/110) and when uterine closure was done using a Reverden uninterrupted suture, they did in 95% (19/20). Conclusion. For the prevention of additional injury, the Gusakov-Zanchenko uterotomy should not be employed especially in CS during labor and delivery. To create the optimal conditions for forming a uterine suture/scar, it is expedient to close the incision with individual sutures, by using an absorbable synthetic suture material.
Full Text

About the authors
V. L KRASNOPOLSKY
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Email: guzmoniiag@gmail.com
L. S LOGUTOVA
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Email: lidialogutova@mail.ru
S. N BUYANOVA
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Email: buyanova-sn@mail.ru
References
- Hospitals in Europe Health Care. Data 1998-2008. Hope European Hospital and Healthcare Federation; 2009. 29 р.
- Patah L.E., Malik A.M. Models of childbirth care and cesarean rates in different countries. Rev. Saude Publica. 2011; 45(1): 185-94.
- World Health Statistics 2010. WHO; 2010. 177 p.
- Prapas N., Kalogiannidis I., Masoura S.,Diamanti E., Makedos A., Drossou D, Makedos G. Operative vaginal delivery in singleton term pregnancies: Shor-term maternal and neonatal outcomes. Hippokratia. 2009; 13(1): 41-5.
- Сухих Г.Т., Коган Е.А., Кесова М.И., Демура Т.А., Донников А.Е., Мартынов А.И. и др. Морфологические и молекулярно-генетические особенности неоангиогенеза в рубцовой ткани у пациенток с недифференцированной дисплазией соединительной ткани. Акушерство и гинекология. 2010; 6: 23-8.
- Сухих Г.Т., Донников А.Е., Кесова М.И., Кан Н.Е., Амирасланов Э.Ю., Климанцев И.В. и др. Оценка состояния рубца матки с помощью математического моделирования на основании клинических и молекулярногенетических предикторов. Акушерство и гинекология. 2013; 1: 33-40.
- Радзинский В.Е., Есипова А.Н., Вученович Ю.В. Аргоноплазменная коагуляция тканей при кесаревом сечении. Акушерство и гинекология. 2010; 6: 28-30.
- Чурганова А.А. Применение фибринового криопреципитата при операции кесарево сечение и его влияние на морфофункциональную полноценность рубца на матке: Автореф. дис.. канд. мед. наук. М.; 2013. 24 с.
Supplementary files
