INCONSISTENT UTERINE SCAR AFTER CESAREAN SECTION: CAUSES OF FORMATION AND TREATMENT POLICY


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The distinguishing feature of present-day surgical obstetrics is the rising number of cesarean resections, the indication for which is an inconsistent uterine scar in more than 70% of cases. Objective. To analyze the outcomes of cesarean section (CS) at different postoperative stages. Subject and methods. A retrospective analysis was made in 479 patients after CS: in 52 puerperas after CS in the postpartum period (within 70 postoperative days), in 42 patients with a postcesarean section uterine scar when planning a next pregnancy, and in 385 pregnant women with a uterine scar after postcesarean section CS during full-term pregnancy. The uterine scar was evaluated from clinical and echoscopic findings. Results. The CS procedure, in particular a method for suturing the incision on the uterus, plays an important role in its scar formation. When individual musculomucosal sutures were used after the Eltsov-Strelkov method, the frequency of inconsistent scars was 38.5% (35/91); when individual musculomucosal sutures and an uninterrupted suture were applied to the uterine fascia proper, it was 13.2% (10/76); when the uterine incision was closed with one-two-layer uninterrupted sutures, inconsistent scars occurred in 95.4% of cases (105/110) and when uterine closure was done using a Reverden uninterrupted suture, they did in 95% (19/20). Conclusion. For the prevention of additional injury, the Gusakov-Zanchenko uterotomy should not be employed especially in CS during labor and delivery. To create the optimal conditions for forming a uterine suture/scar, it is expedient to close the incision with individual sutures, by using an absorbable synthetic suture material.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

V. L KRASNOPOLSKY

Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Email: guzmoniiag@gmail.com

L. S LOGUTOVA

Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Email: lidialogutova@mail.ru

S. N BUYANOVA

Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Email: buyanova-sn@mail.ru

References

  1. Hospitals in Europe Health Care. Data 1998-2008. Hope European Hospital and Healthcare Federation; 2009. 29 р.
  2. Patah L.E., Malik A.M. Models of childbirth care and cesarean rates in different countries. Rev. Saude Publica. 2011; 45(1): 185-94.
  3. World Health Statistics 2010. WHO; 2010. 177 p.
  4. Prapas N., Kalogiannidis I., Masoura S.,Diamanti E., Makedos A., Drossou D, Makedos G. Operative vaginal delivery in singleton term pregnancies: Shor-term maternal and neonatal outcomes. Hippokratia. 2009; 13(1): 41-5.
  5. Сухих Г.Т., Коган Е.А., Кесова М.И., Демура Т.А., Донников А.Е., Мартынов А.И. и др. Морфологические и молекулярно-генетические особенности неоангиогенеза в рубцовой ткани у пациенток с недифференцированной дисплазией соединительной ткани. Акушерство и гинекология. 2010; 6: 23-8.
  6. Сухих Г.Т., Донников А.Е., Кесова М.И., Кан Н.Е., Амирасланов Э.Ю., Климанцев И.В. и др. Оценка состояния рубца матки с помощью математического моделирования на основании клинических и молекулярногенетических предикторов. Акушерство и гинекология. 2013; 1: 33-40.
  7. Радзинский В.Е., Есипова А.Н., Вученович Ю.В. Аргоноплазменная коагуляция тканей при кесаревом сечении. Акушерство и гинекология. 2010; 6: 28-30.
  8. Чурганова А.А. Применение фибринового криопреципитата при операции кесарево сечение и его влияние на морфофункциональную полноценность рубца на матке: Автореф. дис.. канд. мед. наук. М.; 2013. 24 с.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2013 Bionika Media