CHOICE OF A DELIVERY ROUTE AFTER CESAREAN SECTION


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Vaginal birth after cesarean section is becoming more and more common. The once said phrase “once a cesarean section always” is presently criticized by leading obstetricians/gynecologists. The paper shows current trends in choosing the route of delivery in women with previous cesarean section, positive moments of vaginal birth in patients with a uterine scar.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Natalya Enkinovna KAN

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: n_kan@oparina4.ru
doctor of medicine, the head of the obstetric observation department 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str. 4

Victor Leonidovich TYUTYUNNIK

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: tioutiounnik@mail.ru
doctor of medicine, the head of Academician 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str. 4

Marina Isaakovna KESOVA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: m_kesova@oparina4.ru
doctor of medicine, the major scientific collaborator of the obstetric observation department 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str. 4

Anna Andreevna BALUSHKINA

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: ann.balushkina@gmail.com
the postgraduate 117997, Russia, Moscow, Ac. Oparina str. 4

References

  1. Савельева Г.М., Караганова Е.Я., Курцер М.А., Кутакова Ю.Ю., Панина О.Б., Трофимова О.А. Кесарево сечение в современном акушерстве. Акушерство и гинекология. 2007; 2: 3-8
  2. Стрижаков А.Н., Тимохина Т.Ф., Белоусова В.С. Возможно ли снизить частоту кесарева сечения? Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. 2013; 12(3): 5-11
  3. Кесарево сечение в современном акушерстве. Письмо Минздравсоцразвития РФ от 24 июня 2011 года № 15-4/10/2-6139
  4. Краснопольский В.И., Логутова Л.С., Петрухин В.А., Буянова С.Н., Попов А.А., Чечнева М.А. и др. Место абдоминального и влагалищного оперативного родоразрешения в современном акушерстве. Реальность и перспективы. Акушерство и гинекология. 2012; 1: 4-8
  5. Гусева Е.В., Александрова Г.А., Сон И.М., Леонов С.А., Огрызко Е.В., Суханова Л.А., Богуславский М.А., Божко В.Н. Основные показатели здоровья матери и ребенка, деятельность службы охраны детства и родовспоможения в Российской Федерации. М.; 2012. 190 с
  6. Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации. Основные показатели деятельности службы охраны здоровья матери и ребенка в Российской Федерации. М.; 2013. 102 с
  7. OECD Health Statistics. Health at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators. OECD Publ.; 2013. 210 p. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health_ glance-2013-en
  8. Серов В.Н., Сухих Г.Т., ред. Клинические рекомендации. Акушерство и гинекология. 4-е изд. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2014. 1024 с
  9. Приходько А.М., Баев О.Р., Луньков С.С., Еремина О.В., Гус А.И. Возможности методов оценки состояния стенки матки после операции кесарева сечения. Акушерство и гинекология. 2013; 10: 12-6
  10. Габидуллина Р.И., Шамсутдинова Л.Г. К вопросу о применении простагландина Е2 у беременных с рубцом на матке после кесарева сечения. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2013; 2: 48-52
  11. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Caesarean section. NICE clinical guideline; 2011. 57 p.
  12. Guise J.M., Denman M.A., Emeis C. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010; 115(6): 1267-78.
  13. Khunpradit S., Tavender E., Lumbiganon P., Laopaiboon M., Wasiak J., Gruen R.L. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2011; (6): CD005528.
  14. Буянова С.Н., Щукина Н.А., Чечнева М.А., Мгелиашвили М.В., Титченко Ю.П., Пучкова Н.В., Барто Р.А. Современные методы диагностики несостоятельности швов или рубца на матке после кесарева сечения. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2013; 1: 73-7.
  15. Краснопольский В.И., Логутова Л.С., Буянова С.Н. Несостоятельный рубец на матке после кесарева сечения: причины формирования и лечебная тактика. Акушерство и гинекология. 2013; 12: 28-33
  16. Буянова С.Н., Пучкова Н.В. Несостоятельный рубец на матке после кесарева сечения: диагностика, тактика ведения, репродуктивный прогноз. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2011; 4: 36-8
  17. Spong C.Y., Landon M.B., Gilbert S., Rouse D.J., Leveno K.J., Varner M.W. et al. Risk of uterine rupture and adverse perinatal outcome at term after cesarean delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 110(4): 801-17.
  18. Landon M.D. Predicting uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. Semin. Perinatol. 2010; 34(4): 267-71.
  19. Kostrzewa T., Walczak J., Wieckowska K. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Ginekol. Pol. 2010; 81(4): 287-91.
  20. Аргунов В.А., Павлова Т.Ю., Филиппова Р.Д. Оценка полноценности рубца на матке после кесарева сечения: морфологические аспекты. Якутский медицинский журнал. 2007; 2: 18-20.
  21. Hill J.B., Ammons A., Chauhan S.P. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: comparison of ACOG practice bulletin with other national guidelines. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012; 55(4): 969-77.
  22. Sentilhes L., Vayssière C., Beucher G., Deneux-Tharaux C., Deruelle P., Diemunsch P. et al. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2013; 170(1): 25-32.
  23. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin N115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010; 116(2, Pt 1): 450-63.
  24. Scott J.R. Intrapartum management of trial of labour after caesarean delivery: evidence and experience. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2014; 121(2): 157-62.
  25. Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SOGC clinical practice guidelines N155: Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth (Replaces guideline N 147), February 2005. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2005; 89(3): 319-31.
  26. Tahseen S., Griffiths M. Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2) -a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2010; 117(1): 5-19.
  27. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Panel. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8-10, 2010. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010; 115(6): 1279-95.
  28. Studsgaard A., Skorstengaard M., Glavind J., Hvidman L., Uldbjerg N. Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2013; 92(11): 1256-63.
  29. Metz T.D., Stoddard G.J., Henry E., Jackson M., Holmgren C., Esplin S. Simple, validated vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model for use at the time of admission. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 122(3): 571-8.
  30. Grobman W.A., Lai Y., Landon M.B., Spong C.Y., Leveno K.J., Rouse D.J. et al. Prediction of uterine rupture associated with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008; 199(1): 30. e1-5.
  31. Pearson G.A., Eckford S.D. Quantification of risk of emergency caesarean during labour after one previous caesarean section. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2013; 33(7): 692-4.
  32. Obeidat N., Meri Z.B., Obeidat M., Khader Y., Al-Khateeb M., Zayed F. et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) in women with spontaneous labour: predictors of success. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2013; 33(5): 474-8.
  33. Stamilio D.M., DeFranco E., Paré E., Odibo A.O., Peipert J.F., Allsworth J.E. et al. Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 110(5): 1075-82.
  34. Jastrow N., Roberge S., Gauthier R.J., Laroche L., Duperron L., Brassard N., Bujold E. Effect of birth weight on adverse obstetric outcomes in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010; 115(2, Pt 1): 338-43.
  35. Bujold E., Goyet M., Marcoux S., Brassard N., Cormier B., Hamilton E. et al. The role of uterine closure in the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010; 116(1): 43-50.
  36. Madi J.M., Deon J., Rombaldi R.L., de Araújo B.F., Rombaldi M.C., dos Santos M.B. Impact of vaginal delivery after a previous cesarean section on perinatal outcomes. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet. 2013; 35(11): 516-22.
  37. Ogbonmwan S.E., Miller V., Ogbonmwan D.E., Akinsola A.A. Review of vaginal birth after primary caesarean section without prostaglandin induction and or syntocinon augmentation in labour. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 23(4): 281-5.
  38. Grobman W.A., Gilbert S., Landon M.B., Spong C.Y., Leveno K.J., Rouse D.J. et al. Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 109(2, Pt 1): 262-9.
  39. Jozwiak M., Dodd J.M. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013; (3): CD009792.
  40. Dodd J.M., Crowther C.A., Huertas E., Guise J.M., Horey D. Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013; (12): CD004224.
  41. Parant O. Uterine rupture: prediction, diagnosis et management. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. 2012; 41(8): 803-16.
  42. Revicky V., Muralidhar A., Mukhopadhyay S., Mahmood T.A. Case series of uterine rupture: lessons to be learned for future clinical practice. J. Obstet. Gynecol. India. 2012; 62(6): 665-73.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies