Use of the results of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for choosing the optimal size of embolic material for the endovascular treatment of uterine myoma


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To elaborate an algorithm for choosing the size of embolic material for uterine artery embolization (UAE) in patients with uterine myoma. Subjects and methods. The investigation included 63 patients. All the patients underwent bolus contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and further estimation of the contrast medium in the myomatous nodules. According to the type of a kinetic curve for the contrast agent in relation to the intact myometrium, all myomatous nodules were classified into three types: I) a hypovascular nodule; II) a nodule with moderate vascularization; III) a hypervascular nodule. According to the size of the embolic material used, the patients were randomized into two groups of those who received calibrated polyvinyl microspheres 500-700 or 700-900 μm in size. In all the cases, bilateral UAE was performed through right-sided transfemoral approach, followed by MRI evaluation of the efficiency of the procedure. Results. All the patents underwent technically successful bilateral UAEs. Preoperative MRI assigned 188 (57%) of 330 detected myomatous nodules to type I, 73 (22.1%) to type II, and 69 (20.9%) to type III. The type distribution of myomatous nodules was 107, 33, and 41 in Group 1; and it was 81, 40, and 28 in Group 2. According to MRI data, the direct efficiency of UAE was 96.7 and 88.6% in Group 1 and 2, respectively. In accordance with the perfusion types (I, II, and III) of myomatous nodules, the efficiency of embolization was 99.1, 93.9, and 92.7% in Group 1 and 96.3, 95, and 57.1% in Group 2. In Groups 1 and 2, the severity of pain syndrome averaged 4.1±2.1 and 3.1±3.0 scores, respectively. In these groups, the need for narcotic analgesics in the first 24 hours postsurgery was 28.1 and 12.9%, respectively. The amount of spent embolic material averaged 7.8±1.9 and 5.4±2.8 ml in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Conclusion. The calibrated spherical embolic material 700-900 μm in size versus that 500-700 μm in size showed a low efficacy in type III myomatous nodules. Embolic material with smaller embolic particles should be used in patents with type III (hypervascular) myomatous nodules found preoperatively by MRI. That with larger particles should be applied to patients without myomatous nodules to reduce the intensity of pain syndrome.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Vladimir Gennad'evich Bychenko

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia.

Email: vladimir.bychenko@gmail.com
PhD, Senior researcher of the visual diagnostics department

D. M Akinfiev

N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Care, Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: akinfiev_dmitrii@list.ru
interventional radiologist of interventional radiology department

A. V Stepanov

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: a_stepanov@oparina4.ru
PhD, head for clinical affairs of the visual diagnostics department

Yulia Borisovna Kurashvili

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: leri@me.com
MD, professor, professor of the chair of Obstetrics, Gynecology, Perinatology and Reproductive, Faculty for Postgraduate Professional Education of Physicians

Leonid Sergeevich Kokov

N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Care, Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: akinfiev_dmitrii@list.ru
M.D., Ph.D., professor, corresponding member of RAMS, head of interventional radiology department

Yurii Petrovich Gailish

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: y_gaylish@oparina4.ru
PhD, head of radiology department

Sergey Mikhaylovich Voevodin

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: s_voevodin@oparina4.ru
MD, professor, head of the visual diagnostics department

References

  1. Адамян Л.В., Демидов В.Н., Гус А.И. Лучевая диагностика и терапия в акушерстве и гинекологии. Национальное руководство. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2012. [Adamyan L.V., Demidov V.N., Gus A.I. Radiation diagnostics and therapy in obstetrics and gynecology. National guidance. M.: GEOTAR-Media; 2012. (in Russian)]
  2. Тихомиров А.Л. Миома. Патогенетическое обоснование органосохраняющего лечения. Монография. М.; 2013. 319 с. [Tihomirov A.L. Myoma. Pathogenetic substantiation of organ-preserving treatment. Monograph. M.; 2013. 319 p. (in Russian)]
  3. Isonishi S., Coleman R.L., Hirama M., Iida Y., Kitai S., Nagase M., Ochiai K. Analysis of prognostic factors for patients with leiomyoma treated with uterine arterial embolization. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008; 198(3): 270. e1-6.
  4. Katsumori T., Kasahara T., Kin Y., Nozaki T. Infarction of uterine fibroids after embolization: relationship between postprocedural enhanced MRI findings and long-term clinical outcomes. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 2008; 31(1): 66-72.
  5. Hehenkamp W.J., Volkers N.A., Birnie E., Reekers J.A., Ankum W.M. Pain and return to daily activities after uterine artery embolization and hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: results from the randomized EMMY trial. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 2006; 29: 179-87.
  6. Kroencke T.J., Scheurig C., Poellinger A., Gronewold M., Hamm B. Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas: percentage of infarction predicts clinical outcome. Radiology. 2010; 255(3): 834-41.
  7. Pelage J.P., Guaou N.G., Jha R.C., Ascher S.M., Spies J.B. Uterine fibroid tumors: long-term MR imaging outcome after embolization. Radiology. 2004; 230(3): 803-9.
  8. Yousefi S., Czeyda-Pommersheim F., White A.M., Banovac F., Hahn W.Y., Spies J.B. Repeat uterine artery embolization: indications and technical findings. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2006; 17(12): 1923-9.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies