Delivery in women with a uterine scar after cesarean section


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The paper gives the present-day views on labor management tactics in patients with a uterine scar after cesarean section. It analyzes the frequency of maternal and perinatal complications in relation to the choice of delivery mode. It discusses criteria for the choice of delivery methods in patients with a uterine scar after cesarean section and the perspectives for further study areas.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Sergey Levakov

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: levakoff@yandex.ru
doctor of medical sciences, professor, head of chair of obstetrics and gynecology Institute of vocational education

Ekaterina Borovkova

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: Katyanikitina@mail.ru
doctor of medical sciences, associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology Institute of professional education

Natalia Gabitova

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: gabitova_nataliya@mail.ru
doctor of medical sciences, associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology, Institute of professional education

参考

  1. Kerr J.M.M. The lower uterine segment incision in conservative caesarean section. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1921; 28(3-4): 475-87.
  2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Vaginal delivery after previous cesarean birth. Committee opinion no. 143. Washington, DC: ACOG; 1994.
  3. Uddin S.F., Simon A.E. Rates and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990-2009. Matern. Child Health J. 2013; 17(7): 1309-14.
  4. Lydon-Rochelle M., Holt V.L., Easterling T.R., Martin D.P. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001; 345(1): 3-8.
  5. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Panel. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8-10, 2010. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010; 115(6): 1279-95.
  6. Roberts R.G., Deutchman M., King V.J., Fryer G.E., Miyoshi T.J. Changing policies on vaginal birth after cesarean: impact on access. Birth. 2007; 34(4): 316-22.
  7. Shihady I.R., Broussard P., Bolton L.B., Fink A., Fridman M., Fridman R. et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: do California hospital policies follow national guidelines? J. Reprod. Med. 2007; 52(5): 349-58.
  8. Dodd J.M., Crowther C.A., Huertas E., Guise J.M., Horey D. Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013; (12): CD004224.
  9. Guise J.M., Denman M.A., Emeis C., Marshall N., Walker M., Fu R. et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010; 115(6): 1267-78.
  10. Bernstein S.N., Matalon-Grazi S., Rosenn B.M. Trial of labor versus repeat cesarean: are patients making an informed decision? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012; 207(3): 204. e1-6.
  11. Sentilhes L., Vayssière C., Beucher G., Deneux-Tharaux C., Deruelle P., Diemunsch P. et al. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2013; 170(1): 25-32.
  12. Chaillet N., Bujold E., Dubé E., Grobman W.A. Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after caesarean. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2013; 35(2): 119-24.
  13. Metz T.D., Stoddard G.J., Henry E., Jackson M., Holmgren C., Esplin S. Simple, validated vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model for use at the time of admission. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 122(3): 571-8.
  14. Schoorel E.N., van Kuijk S.M., Melman S., Nijhuis J.G., Smits L.J., Aardenburg R. et al. Vaginal birth after a caesarean section: the development of a Western European population-based prediction model for deliveries at term. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2014; 121(2): 194-201; discussion 201.
  15. Landon M.B., Leindecker S., Spong C.Y., Hauth J.C., Bloom S., Varner M.W. et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005; 193(3, Pt 2): 1016-23.
  16. Tahseen S., Griffiths M. Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2010; 117(1): 5-19.
  17. Wilson R.D., Lemerand K., Johnson M.P., Flake A.W., Bebbington M., Hedrick H.L., Adzick N.S. Reproductive outcomes in subsequent pregnancies after a pregnancy complicated by open maternal-fetal surgery (1996-2007). Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010; 203(3): 209. e1-6.
  18. Kiran T.S., Chui Y.K., Bethel J., Bhal P.S. Is gestational age an independent variable affecting uterine scar rupture rates? Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2006; 126(1): 68-71.
  19. Jastrow N., Roberge S., Gauthier R.J., Laroche L., Duperron L., Brassard N., Bujold E. Effect of birth weight on adverse obstetric outcomes in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010; 115(2, Pt 1): 338-43.
  20. Aslan H., Unlu E., Agar M., Ceylan Y. Uterine rupture associated with misoprostol labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2004; 113(1): 45-8.
  21. Dekker G.A., Chan A., Luke C.G., Priest K., Riley M., Halliday J. et al. Risk of uterine rupture in Australian women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean section: a retrospective population-based cohort study. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2010; 117(11): 1358-65.
  22. Macones G.A., Peipert J., Nelson D.B., Odibo A., Stevens E.J., Stamilio D.M. et al. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005; 193(5): 1656-62.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Bionika Media, 2015
##common.cookie##