Echographic characteristics of the uterus in the early and late period after abdominal delivery


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

A search for optimal criteria in assessing the morphofunctional status of the uterus in patients after abdominal delivery does not lose its relevance now. For this purpose, a study of the echographic characteristics reflecting the status of the organ in the early and late postoperative period not only will extend our views on the specific features of the process of uterine involution and the pathophysiological mechanisms of scar formation, but will also allow the management of subsequent pregnancies and deliveries to be predicted. Objective. To investigate the echographic characteristics of the uterine status in the early and late period after cesarean section (CS). Subjects and methods. The echographic parameters of a scar and the uterus were analyzed in 115 puerperas with uncomplicated postpartum (n = 30) and postoperative (n = 85) periods on day 4 and three months after spontaneous (n = 26) and surgical (n = 18) delivery. Results. On day 4 after CS, the women with spontaneous labor showed significant differences in the anteroposterior sizes of the wall of the uterus in the area of its isthmus (p = 0.023) and in the length of the cervix uteri (p = 0.028) as compared with ultrasound parameters. Three months after surgery, only the width of the uterus was significantly smaller than that in the women after spontaneous labor (p = 0.0001). At the same time, the anteroposterior size of the uterus (р = 0.0082) and the thickness of its anterior (р = 0.025) and posterior (р = 0.0001) walls and myometrium in the scar area (р = 0.0001) proved to be significantly larger. No differences among the groups were found in the volume of the uterus (p = 0.74). Three months following CS, the scar area displayed remnants of suture materials in 6.67% of cases and niches in 6.67%. Conclusion. CS surgery affected the processes of uterine involution in the late postoperative period. The scar formation-induced uterine anatomic and functional differences found at ultrasound study are also detected 3 months following delivery. The echographic signs of incomplete and inadequate regenerative processes in 13.34% of cases necessitate the continuation of studies identifying the determinants of the formation of scar incompetence and those preventing these disorders. The described features should be kept in mind when evaluating the morphofunctional status of the uterus in women after CS and predicting the course of a subsequent pregnancy and labor.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Andrey Prikhodko

Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: a_prikhodko@oparina4.ru
obstetrician-gynecologist of Maternity Department

Oleg Baev

Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: metod_obsgyn@hotmail.com
MD, Phd, professor, the head of Maternity Department

Stanislav Lunkov

Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: s_lunkov@oparina4.ru
specialist of department of ultrasound diagnostic

Olga Eremina

Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: o_eremina@oparina4.ru
specialist of department of ultrasound diagnostic

Aleksandr Gus

Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: a_gus@oparina4.ru
MD, Phd, professor, the head of department of ultrasound diagnostic

参考

  1. Стрижаков А.Н., Баев О.Р., Старкова Т.Г., Рыбин М.В. Физиология и патология послеродового периода. М.: Династия; 2004. 120с.
  2. Гус А.И., Бабичева Т.В. Инволюция матки при неосложненном течении пуэрперия. В. кн.: Материалы 6-го Российского форума «Мать и дитя». М.; 2004: 62.
  3. Титченко Ю.П., Логутова Л.С., Климова И.В. Современные аспекты ультразвуковой диагностики осложнений в послеродовом периоде. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2006; 6(3): 22-5.
  4. Rodgers S.K., Kirby C.L., Smith R.J., Horrow M.M. Imaging after cesarean delivery: acute and chronic complications. Radiographics. 2012; 32(6): 1693-712. doi: 10.1148/rg.326125516.
  5. Shaamash A.H., Ahmed A.G., Abdel Latef M.M., Abdullah S.A. Routine postpartum ultrasonography in the prediction of puerperal uterine complications. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2007; 98(2): 93-9.
  6. Sokol E.R., Casele H., Haney E.I. Ultrasound examination of the postpartum uterus: what is normal? J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004; 15(2): 95-9.
  7. Zubor P., Szunyogh N., Dokus K., Scasny P., Kajo K., Galo S. et al. Application of uterotonics on the basis of regular ultrasonic evaluation of the uterus prevents unnecessary surgical intervention in the postpartum period. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2010; 282(3): 261-7. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1227-5.
  8. Brunn J., Block U., Ruf G., Bos I., Kunze W.P., Scriba P.C. Volumetrie der Schilddrüsenlappen mittels Real-time-Sonographie. Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 1981; 106(41): 1338-40.
  9. Al-Bdour A.N., Akasheh H.F., Al-Husban N.A. Ultrasonography of the uterus after normal vaginal delivery. Saudi Med. J. 2004; 25(1): 41-4.
  10. Bae H.S., Ahn K.H., Oh M.J., Kim H.J., Hong S.C. Postpartum uterine involution: sonographic changes in the endometrium between 2 and 6 weeks postpartum related to delivery mode and gestational age at delivery. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2012; 39(6): 726-8.
  11. Negishi H., Kishida T., Yamada H., Hirayama E., Mikuni M., Fujimoto S. Changes in uterine size after vaginal delivery and cesarean section deter mined by vaginal sonography in the puerperium. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 1999; 263(1-2): 13-6.
  12. Belachew J., Axelsson O., Mulic-Lutvica A., Eurenius K. Longitudinal study of the uterine body and cavity with three-dimensional ultrasonography in the puerperium. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2012; 91(10): 1184-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01418.x.
  13. Стрижаков А.Н., Баев О.Р., Давыдов А.И. Инфекционные осложнения кесарева сечения В. кн.: Стрижаков А.Н., Давыдов А.И. Трансвагинальная эхография 2Д и 3Д методы. М.: ОСЛН; 2006: 124- 37.
  14. Armstrong V., Hansen W., Van Voorhis B., Syrop C. Detection of cesarean scars by transvaginal ultrasound. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003; 101(1): 61-5.
  15. Osser O.V., Jokubkiene L., Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 34(1): 90-7.
  16. Koskas M., Nizard J., Salomon L.J., Ville Y. Abdominal and pelvic ultrasound findings within 24 hours following uneventful Cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2008; 32(4): 520-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.6120.
  17. Rodgers S.K., Kirby C.L., Smith R.J., Horrow M.M. Imaging after cesarean delivery: acute and chronic complications. Radiographics. 2012; 32(6): 1693-712.
  18. Weissmann-Brenner A., Haas J., Barzilay E., Gilboa Y., Gat I., Gindes L. et al. Added value of 3-dimensional sonography for endometrial evaluation in early puerperium. J. Ultrasound Med. 2013; 32(4): 587-92.
  19. Hamar B.D., Saber S.B., Cackovic M., Magloire L.K., Pettker C.M., Abdel-Razeq S.S. et al. Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery. A randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007; 110(4): 808-13.
  20. Mulic-Lutvica A. Postpartum ultrasound. In: Asim Kurjak, Chervenak F.A., eds. Donald school: Textbook of ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology. Informa Healthcare; 2011: 521-40.
  21. Mulic-Lutvica A., Axelsson O. Postpartum ultrasound in women with postpartum endometritis, after cesarean section and after manual evacuation of the placenta. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2007; 86(2): 210-7.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Bionika Media, 2015
##common.cookie##