Infiltrating endometriosis of the urinary tract: Mechanisms of growth and progression. Clinical, morphological, and immunohistochemical examinations


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective: to reveal the clinical, morphological, and immunohistochemical features of infiltrating endometriosis of the urinary tract, as well as the role of cells with the signs of stemness in its pathogenesis. Subjects and methods. The investigation enrolled 62 patients who had been examined and treated at the V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology for infiltrating endometriosis involving the urinary tract in the period February 2010 to May 2015. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of patients with infiltrating endometriosis of the urinary tract who had sought medical advice for this disease for the first time. Group 2 included patients with infiltrating endometriosis of the urinary tract who had been previously treated for endometriosis. A control group (Group 3) was made up for immunohistochemical examination. Groups 1 and 2 patients underwent physical examination and all necessary clinical, laboratory, and instrumental studies (ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, coloscopy, and cystoscopy) for specifying the diagnosis and preparing for surgical treatment. The latter was performed in 61 patients; 1 patient was discharged home prior to surgery due to family circumstances. The normal endometrium during the proliferative phase, which had been taken from 10 women (surrogate mothers), was examined in the control group (Group 3). Histological examination was performed in 61 patients. Immunohistochemical examination was done in 25 patients: 5 from Group 1, 10 from Group 2, and in 10 from the control group. Results. In recurrent endometriosis of the urinary tract, the intestine was more commonly involved in the endometrioid process. In Group 2, double endometrioid infiltrations of various intestinal portions were also encountered in the same patient. Morphological examination showed that the endometrioid foci possessed the properties of active foci. The recurrent foci more frequently displayed cystically transformed glands with polypoid proliferations of the epithelium and fibrosis of the adjacent tissues. Studying the results of immunohistochemical reactions discovered the specific features of the expression of epithelial and mesenchymal differentiation markers (CKWw, Cld3, and Vimentin), and those of stemness markers (PTEN, CD15, ALDH1, Musashi, and SOX2) in the endometrioid heterotopies and autologous endometrium. Conclusion. The endometrioid heterotopies differ from the autologous endometrium not only in their structure, but also in the degree of maturity of cells and their molecular arrangement according to Vimentin-у, Musashi, ALDH1, CD15, and SOX2. The endometrioid heterotopies have higher expression of the stemness markers, suggesting their relative immaturity, which manifests itself as higher active proliferation and infiltrative growth.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Anna Martunovna Khachatryan

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: a_hachatryan@oparina4.ru
Postgraduate Student, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, Perinatology, and Reproductology, Faculty for Postgraduate Professional Training of Physicians

Evgenia A. Kogan

Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia; I.M. Sechenov 1st MSMU

Email: koganevg@gmail.com. e_kogan@oparina4.ru
MD, Professor, Head of the 1st patology department; Professor of the Department of Pathological Anatomy

Vladimir Dmitrievich Chuprynin

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: v_chuprynin@oparina4.ru
PhD, Head of the Department of General Surgery

Nina B. Paramonova

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; I.M. Sechenov 1st MSMU

Email: e_kogan@oparina4.ru
Ph.D., researher of the 1st anatomopathological department; Department of Pathological Anatomy

Leila V. Adamyan

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Email: l_adamyan@oparina4.ru
Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, MD, PhD, Professor, Honored Master of Science of the Russian Federation, Head Specialist in Obstetrics and Gynecology of Ministry of Healthcare and Social Development of Russia, Head of the Department of Surgical Gynecology; Head of the Department of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Postgraduate Education

Elena Grigorevna Khilkevich

Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: e_khilkevich@oparina4.ru
leading researcher of General Surgery; professor of Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, Perinatology and Reproductive

Olga Igorevna Yazykova

Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Email: olushka-92@mail.ru
Undergraduate of the medical faculty

References

  1. Donnez J., Spada F., Squifflet J., Nisolle M. Bladder endometriosis must be considered as bladder adenomyosis. Fertil. Steril. 2000; 74(6): 1175-81.
  2. Vercellini P., Pisacreta A., Pesole A., Vincentini S., Stellato G., Crosignani E. Is ureteral endometriosis an asymmetric disease? BJOG. 2000; 107(4): 559-61.
  3. Vercellini P., Frontino G., Pisacreta A., De Giorgi O., Cattaneo M., Crosignani P.G. The pathogenesis of bladder detrusor endometriosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002; 187(3): 538-42.
  4. Donnez J., Van Langendonckt A., Casanas-Roux F., Van Gossum J.P., Pirard C., Jadoul P. et al. Current thinking on the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2002; 54(Suppl.): 52-62.
  5. Vercellini P., Meschia M., De Giorgi O., Panazza S., Cortesi I., Crosignani P.G. Bladder detrusor endometriosis: clinical and pathogenetic implications. J. Urol. 1996; 155(1): 84-6.
  6. Chapron C., Chopin N., Borghese B., Foulot H., Dousset B., Vacher-Lavenu M.C. et al. Deeply infiltrating endometriosis: pathogenetic implications of the anatomical distribution. Hum. Reprod. 2006; 21(7): 1839-45.
  7. Blumenkrantz M.J., Gallagher N., Bashore R.A., Tenckhoff H. Retrograde menstruation in women undergoing chronic peritoneal dialysis. Obstet. Gynecol. 1981; 57(5): 667-70.
  8. Gajda M., Tyloch J, Tyloch F., Skok Z., Sujkowska R., Krakowiak J. Endometriosis of the urinary bladder. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 1999; 31(1): 39-44.
  9. Sassona I.E., Taylora H.S. Stem cells and the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2008; 1127: 106-15.
  10. Matthai C., Horvat R., Noe M., Nagele F., Radjabi A., van Trotsenburg M. et al. Oct-4 expression in human endometrium. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2006; 12(1): 7-10.
  11. Bentz E.K., Kenning M., Schneeberger C., Kolbus A., Huber J.C., Hefler L.A., Tempfer C.B. OCT-4 expression in follicular and luteal phase endometrium: a pilot study. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2010; 8: 38. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-38.
  12. Götte M., Wolf M., Staebler A., Buchweitz O., Kelsch R., Schüring A.N., Kiesel L. Increased expression of the adult stem cell marker Musashi-1 in endometriosis and endometrial carcinoma. J. Pathol. 2008; 215(3): 317-29. doi: 10.1002/ path.2364.
  13. Cho N.H., Park Y.K., Kim Y.T., Yang H., Kim S.K. Lifetime expression of stem cell markers in the uterine endometrium. Fertil Steril. 2004; 81(2): 403-7.
  14. Kato K., Yoshimoto M., Kato K., Adachi S., Yamayoshi A., Arima T. et al. Characterization of side-population cells in human normal endometrium. Hum. Reprod. 2007; 22(5): 1214-23.
  15. Коган Е.А., Парамонова Н.Б., Демура Т.А., Файзулина Н.М., Овакимян А.С., Адамян Л.В. Морфологический субстрат и патогенетические механизмы синдрома тазовой боли при эндометриозе. Архив патологии. 2014; 76(6): 37-46. doi: 10.17116/patol201476637-43. [Kogan E.A., Paramonova N.B., Demura T.A., Fayzulina N.M., Ovakimyan A.S., Adamyan L.V. Morphological substrate and pathogenetic mechanisms of pelvic pain syndrome, endometriosis. Arhiv patologii. 2014; 76(6): 37-46. (in Russian)]
  16. Song Y., Xiao L., Fu J., Huang W., Wang Q., Zhang X., Yang S. Increased expression of the pluripotency markers sex-determining region Y-box 2 and Nanog homeobox in ovarian endometriosis. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2014; 12: 42.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies