INFORMING AND COUNSELLING WITH THE USE OF ELECTRONIC RESOURCES PRIOR TO DRUG-INDUCED ABORTION


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To improve the quality of informing and counselling patients before pregnancy termination and to assess physicians’ satisfaction with the content of audio-video presentations on standard questions given prior to abortion. Subjects and methods. This was a multicenter prospective simple cohort controlled study. Information on test questions was collected using specially designed 20-item questionnaires for physicians. The investigators analyzed 92 questionnaires, including 62 ones that contained information on patients who had listened to the audio-video before pregnancy termination (a study group) and 30 ones having on those who had obtained only oral information from a physician. Results. 40% (12/30) of the patients who had obtained only a physician’s oral information prior to abortion called their physician between the administration of mifepristone and the control visit versus 3.2% (2/62) of those who had listened to the audio-video did this 12 times less frequently (p < 0.001). An additional visit was made by 13.3% (4/30) of the patients on their own initiative without having any evidence for this (only two of them had any complications) and by 3.2% (2/62) of those in the study group (by 4 times less frequently). On the contrary, the number of patients who had not made a control visit on the scheduled day was 23.3% (7/30) and 9.7% (6/62), respectively; that was 2.4 times less frequently (p < 0.005). Regardless of its form, counselling prior to abortion caused a high frequency of contraception choice (96.8% (60/62) in the study group and 86.7% (26/30) in the control group). Conclusion. The quality of pre-abortion information with the use of audio-video presentations on modern gadgets corresponds to the high assessments by physicians and allows them to improve the consultation process, which is accompanied by the optimization of working time, by reducing the latter to provide the information and decreasing the number of phone calls and unscheduled visits.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Galina B. Dikke

Email: galadikke@yandex.ru
Honoured Science and Education, MD, professor of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive medicine, faculty of continuing medical education, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. 117198, Russia, Moscow, Miklukho-Maklaya str. 8

Eugene E. Plotko

Email: plotko61@gmail.com
MD, professor of obstetrics and gynecology, the head physician, Garmoniya (Harmony) Medical Center, Ural State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia 620028, Russia, Yekaterinburg, Repina str. 3

Dmitry M. Kochev

Email: pentcroft@mail.ru
CEO, ZAO “Pentkroft Farma”. 129110, Russia, Moscow, pr. Mira 68, bld. 2

Andrey M. Katzay

Email: katsai@mail.ru
Competitor of the Department of Public Health of I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia Director of "Alfa-Med". 119991, Russia, Moscow, Trubetskaya str. 8, bld. 2. 640000, Russia, Kurgan, st. Karl Marx, 3I/II

References

  1. Конвенция о защите прав и достоинства человека в связи с применением достижений биологии и медицины: Конвенция о правах человека и биомедицине. Овьедо, 4 апреля 1997 года. Available at: https://www.coe. int/ [Convention on the protection of human rights and dignity in relation to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine. Oviedo, April 4, 1997. Available at: https://www.coe.int/ (in Russian)]
  2. Федеральный закон от 21.11.2011 N 323-ФЗ (ред. от 03.07.2016) «Об основах охраны здоровья граждан в Российской Федерации». Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/ [The federal law from 21.11.2011 N 323-FZ (ed. From 07.03.2016) „On the basis of public health protection in the Russian Federation.” Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/ (in Russian)]
  3. Приказ Минздрава России от 12 ноября 2012 г. № 572н «Об утверждении Порядка оказания медицинской помощи по профилю «акушерство и гинекология (за исключением использования вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий)». Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/ [Order of the Russian Ministry of Health on November 12, 2012 № 572n „On approval of the provision of medical care on the profile of „Obstetrics and Gynecology (except for the use of assisted reproductive technologies).” Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/ (in Russian)]
  4. Погодина Т.Г. К вопросу о добровольном информированном согласии на медицинское вмешательство как неотъемлемое право пациента. Юридическая наука и практика: Вестник Нижегородской академии МВД России. 2015; 2: 90-3. [Pogodina T.G. On the issue of free and informed consent to medical intervention as an inalienable right of the patient. Legal Science and Practice: Journal of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the MOI of Russia. 2015; 2: 90-3. (in Russian)]
  5. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. Second edition. World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research; 2012. 132р.
  6. Дикке Г.Б. Медикаментозный аборт. Руководство для практических врачей. Радзинский В.Е., ред. М.: МЕДпресс-информ; 2015. 344с. [Dikke G.B. Medical abortion. Guidance for practitioners. Radzinsky V.E., ed. Moscow: MEDpress-inform; 2015. 344p. (in Russian)]
  7. Дикке Г.Б., Яроцкая Е.Л., Ерофеева Л.В. Стратегическая оценка политики, программ и услуг в сфере непланируемой беременности, абортов и контрацепции в Российской Федерации. Совместное исследование МЗ и СР РФ и ВОЗ. Проблемы репродукции. 2010; 3: 92-108. [Dikke G.B., Yarotskaya E.L., Yerofeyeva L.V. Strategic assessment of policies, programs and services in unplanned pregnancy, abortion and contraception in the Russian Federation. A joint study by Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation and WHO. Problemyi reproduktsii. 2010; 3: 92-108. (in Russian)]
  8. Steinberg T.N. Abortion counseling: to benefit maternal health. Am. J. Law Med. 1989; 15(4): 483-517.
  9. Vandamme J., Wyverkens E., Buysse A., Vrancken C., Brondeel R. Pre-abortion counselling from women’s point of view. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care. 2013; 18(4): 309-18.
  10. Gould H., Foster D.G., Perrucci A.C., Barar R.E., Roberts S.C. Predictors of abortion counseling receipt and helpfulness in the United States. Women’s Health Issues. 2013; 23(4): e249-55.
  11. Дикке Г.Б., Яроцкая Е.Л., Ерофеева Л.В. Внедрение современных методов прерывания беременности в отечественную практику. Акушерство и гинекология. 2014; 2: 67-73. [Dikke G.B., Yarotskaya E.L., Erofeeva L.V. Introduction of current methods for pregnancy termination in Russian practice. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya/Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014; 2: 67-73. (in Russian)]
  12. Barclay L., Lie D. Physician-patient telephone calls may rise to medical communication errors. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2005; 20(10): 959-63.
  13. Радзинский В.Е., Оразмурадов А.А., ред. Ранние сроки беременности. М.: StatusPraesens; 2009. [Radzinsky V.E., Orazmuradov A.A., eds. The early stages of pregnancy. Moscow: StatusPraesens; 2009. (in Russian)]
  14. Bender S.S., Geirsson R.T. Effectiveness of preabortion counseling on postabortion contraceptive use. Contraception. 2004; 69(6): 481-7.
  15. Bianchi-Demicheli F., Perrin E., Bianchi P.G., Dumont P., Lüdicke F., Campana A. Contraceptive practice before and after termination of pregnancy: a prospective study. Contraception. 2003; 67(2): 107-13.
  16. Прилепская В.Н., Назарова Н.М., Тарасова М.А., Летуновская А.Б. Международный проект «CHOICE»: краткий обзор результатов исследования. Гинекология. 2010; 12(4): 26-8. [Prilepskaya V.N., Nazarova N.M., Tarasova M.A., Letunovskaya A.B. The international project «CHOICE»: an overview of survey results. Ginekologiya. 2010; 12(4): 26-8. (in Russian)]
  17. Secura G.M., Allsworth J.E., Madden T., Mullersman J.L., Peipert J.F. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010; 203(2): 115. e1-7.
  18. Hooper D.J. Attitudes, awareness, compliance and preferences among hormonal contraception users: a global, cross-sectional, self-administered, online survey. Clin. Drug Investig. 2010; 30(11): 749-63.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2016 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies