Current possibilities of colposcopy in the complex diagnosis of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions
- Authors: Prilepskaya V.N.1, Bairamova G.R.1, Zarochentseva N.V.1,2, Efendieva Z.N.1, Amirkhanyan A.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
- M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute
- Issue: No 3 (2018)
- Pages: 146-149
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/248237
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2018.3.146-149
- ID: 248237
Cite item
Abstract
Full Text
About the authors
Vera Nikolaevna Prilepskaya
Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russiadoctor of medical science, Deputy Director for Science
Gyuldana Raufovna Bairamova
Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: g_bairamova@oparina4.ru
MD, head of the department. on the clinical work of the scientific and polyclinic department
Nina Viktorovna Zarochentseva
Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia; M.F. Vladimirsky Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute
Email: ninazarll@mail.ru
MD, leading research assistant of the Department of Gynecological Endocrinology; Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Faculty of Advanced Medical Education
Zulfiya Nurudinovna Efendieva
Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: efendievaz@yandex.ru
Clinical Resident of the 1st year of training
Armine Samvelovna Amirkhanyan
Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: 07062005@mail.ru
post-graduate student of the scientific-polyclinic department
References
- www.who.int.
- Nayar R., Wibur D., eds. The Bethesda system for reporting cervical cytology: definitions, criteria, and explanatory notes. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2015.
- Сухих Г.Т., Прилепская В.Н., ред. Профилактика рака шейки матки. Руководство для врачей. 3-е изд. М.: МЕДпресс-информ; 2012: 38-49.
- Shiraz A., Majmudar T. Colposcopy and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet. Gynaecol. Reprod. Med. 2017; 27(6): 177-83.
- Прилепская В.Н., Байрамова Г.Р., Коган Е.А., Чернова В.Ф., Окушко А.Н. Новые возможности ранней диагностики и профилактики ВПЧ-ассоциированных поражений шейки матки. Медицинский совет. 2015; ХХ: 72-7.
- Гудзь О.В., Камилова И.К., Миклин О.П. ВПЧ-инфекция шейки матки: перспективы комплексного лечения. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2016; 16(2): 99-103.
- Ding Z., Li Y., Chen A., Song M., Zhang Y. Punch biopsy guided by both colposcopy and HR-HPV status is more efficient for identification of immediate high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion pr worse among HPV-infected women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2016; 207: 32-6.
- Апгар Б.С., Броцман Г.Л., Шпицер М. Клиническая кольпоскопия. Пер. с англ. М.: Практическая медицина; 2012: 106.
- Louwers J.A., Zaal A., Kocken M., Berkhof J., Papagiannakis E., Snijders P.J. et al. The performance of Dynamic Spectral Imaging colposcopy depends on indication for referrals. Gynecol. Oncol. 2015; 139(3): 452-7.
- Bornstein J., Bentley J., Bösze P., Girardi F., Haefner H., Menton M. et al. 2011 colposcopic terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120(1): 166-72.
- Louwers J.A., Kocken M., Ter Harmsel W.A., Verheijen R.H.M. Digital colposcopy: ready for use? An overview of literature. BJOG. 2009; 116(2): 220-9.
- Zaal A., Louwers J.A., Berkhof J., Kocken M., Ter Harmsel W.A., Graziosi G.C. et al. Agreement between colposcopic impression and histological diagnosis among human papillomavirus type 16-positive women: a clinical trial using dynamic spectral imaging colposcopy. BJOG. 2012; 119(5): 537-44.
- Coronado P.J., Fasero M. Colposcopy combined with dynamic spectral imaging. A prospective clinical study. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2016; 196: 11-6.
- Louwers J., Zaal A., Kocken M., Ter Harmsel W., Graziosi G., Spruijt J. et al. Dynamic spectral imaging colposcopy: higher sensitivity for detection of premalignant cervical lesions. BJOG. 2011; 118(3): 309-18.
- Soutter W.P., Diakomanolis E., Lyons D., Ghaem-Maghami S., Ajala T., Haidopoulos D. et al. Dynamic spectral imaging: improving colposcopy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009; 15(5): 1814-20.
- Livingston J., Papagiannakis E. How colposcopy misses invasive cervical cancer: a case report from the IMPROVE-COLPO study. Case Rep. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 2016: 5857370.
- Coronado P.J., Fasero M. Correlating the accuracy of colposcopy with practitioner experience when diagnosing cervical pathology using the Dynamic Spectral Imaging System (DySIS). Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2014; 78(4): 224-9.
- Louwers J.A., Zaal A., Kocken M., Papagiannakis E., Meijer C.J., Verheijen R.H. Women’s preferences of dynamic spectral imaging colposcopy. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2015; 79(4): 239-43.
- Wade R., Spackman E., Corbett M., Wailer S., Light K., Nair R. et al. Adjunctive colposcopy technologies for examination of the uterine cervix - DySIS, LuViva, Advanced Cervical Scan and Niris Imaging System: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol. Assess. 2013; 17(8): 1-240, v-vi.
- Leeson S. Advances in colposcopy: new technologies to challenge current practice. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2014; 182: 140-5.
- Mustafa R.A., Santesso N., Khatib R., Mustafa A.A., Wiercioch W., Kehar R. et al. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the accuracy of HPV tests, visual inspection with acetic acid, cytology, and colposcopy. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2016; 132(3): 259-65.