The role of preeclampsia in pregnancy outcomes: the view of a neonatologist


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To analyze the health status of infants born to mothers with preeclampsia and the course of their early neonatal period. Material and methods. The study analyzed perinatal outcomes in 525 mother-newborn pairs, who were divided into two groups. Group 1 included 160 infants born to mothers with preeclampsia; group 2 comprised 365 infants born to mothers with normal pregnancies. The analysis involved women’s medical history, the course of pregnancy, childbirth, delivery mode, and the course of the early neonatal period of newborns. Results. The study findings showed that infants born to mothers with preeclampsia are more likely to have congenital developmental anomalies, genetic and metabolic disorders, and a higher risk of infectious and hematological diseases. Conclusion. The severity of newborns’ condition, the risk of neonatal complications, the severity of infectious processes, and hypoxic-ischemic conditions has a direct correlation with the timing and severity of preeclampsia.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Leila A. Timofeeva

V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of Minzdrav of Russia

Email: l_timofeeva@oparina4.ru
PhD, head of the Neonatal Unit

Anna L. Karavaeva

V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of Minzdrav of Russia

Email: a_karavaeva@oparina4.ru
clinical care supervisor at the Neonatal Unit

Victor V. Zubkov

V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of Minzdrav of Russia

Email: v_zubkov@oparina4.ru
MD, director of the Institute of Neonatology

Anna R. Kirtbaya

V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of Minzdrav of Russia

Email: a_kirtbaya@oparina4.ru
PhD, clinical care supervisor at the Neonatal ICU

Natalia E. Kan

V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of Minzdrav of Russia

Email: kan-med@mail.ru
MD, professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Victor L. Tyutyunnik

V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of Minzdrav of Russia

Email: tioutiounnik@mail.ru
MD, professor, head of the Obstetric Physiological Department

References

  1. Сухих Г.Т., Ходжаева З.С., Филиппов О.С., Адамян Л.В., Краснопольский В.И., Серов В.Н., Сидорова И.С., Баев О.Р., Башмакова Н.В., Кан Н.Е., Клименченко Н.И., Макаров О.В., Никитина Н.А., Петрухин В.А., Пырегов А.В., Рунихина Н.К., Тетруашвили Н.К., Тютюнник В.Л., Холин А.М., Шмаков Р.Г., Шешко Е.Л. Федеральные клинические рекомендации. Гипертензивные расстройства во время беременности, в родах и послеродовом периоде. Преэклампсия. Эклампсия. М.: Российское общество акушеров-гинекологов; 2013.
  2. Pare E., Parry S., McElrath T.F., Pucci D., Newton A., Lim K.H. Clinical risk factors for preeclampsia in the 21st century. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014; 124(4): 76370. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000451.
  3. Shamshirsaz A.A., Paidas M., Krikun G. Preeclampsia, hypoxia, thrombosis, and inflammation. J. Pregnancy. 2012; 2012: 374047. https://dx.doi. org/10.1155/2012/374047.
  4. Blencowe H., Cousens S., Oestergaard M.Z., Chou D., Moller A.B., Narwal R. et al. National, regional, and estimates of preterm birth rates in the 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countriesA a systematic analisis and implications. Lancet. 2012; 379(9832): 2162-72. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0140-6736(12)60820-4.
  5. Vikse B.E., Irgens L.M., Leivestad T., Skjaerven R., Iversen B.M. Preeclampsia and the risk of end-stage renal disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008; 359(8): 800-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0706790.
  6. Cornelius D.C. Preeclampsia: From inflammation to immunregulation. Clin. Med. Insights Blood Disord. 2018; 11: 1179545X17752325. https://doi. org/10.1177/1179545X17752325. eCollection 2018.
  7. WHO recommendations for prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. WHO; 2011.
  8. Ukah V., De Silva D.A., Payne B. Prediction of adverse maternal outcomes from pre-eclampsia and other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A systematic review. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2017; 11: 115-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.preghy.2017.11.006.
  9. Ходжаева З.С.,Коган Е.А.,Клименченко Н.И.,Акатьева А.С., Сафонова А.Д., Холин А.М., Вавина О.В., Сухих Г.Т. Клинико-патогенетические особенности ранней и поздней преэклампсии. Акушерство и гинекология. 2015; 1: 12-7.
  10. Какорин Е.П., Стародубов В.И., ред. Основные показатели здоровья матери и ребенка, деятельность службы охраны детства и родовспоможения в Российской Федерации. М.: Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации, Департамент мониторинга, анализа и стратегического развития здравоохранения, ФГБУ «Центральный научно-исследовательский институт организации и информатизации здравоохранения» Минздрава Российской Федерации; 2018.
  11. Liem S., Schuit E., Hegeman M., Bais J., de Boer K., Bloemenkamp K. et al. Cervical pessaries for prevention of preterm birth in women with a multiple pregnancy (ProTWIN): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2013; 382(9901): 1341-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61408-7.
  12. Backes C.H., Markham K., Moore he ad P., Cordero L., Nankervis C.A., Giannone P.J. Maternal preeclampsia and neonatal outcomes. J. Pregnancy. 2011; 2011: 214365. https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/214365.
  13. Ton T.G., Bennett M., Incerti D., Peneva D., Druzin M., Stevens W. et al. Maternal and infant adverse outcomes associated with mild and severe preeclampsia during the first year after delivery in the United States. Am. J. Perinatol. 2019; Feb.19. https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1679916.
  14. Roos N., Kieler H., Sahlin L., Ekman-Ordeberg G, Falconer H., Stephansson O. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2011; 343: d6309. https://dx.doi. org/10.1136/bmj.d6309.
  15. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Hypertension in pregnancy. NICE clinical guideline 107. London: RCOG Press; 2011.
  16. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 671: Perinatal risks associated with assisted reproductive technology. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 128(3): e61-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ AOG.0000000000001643.
  17. Стародубов В.И., Суханова Л.П. Репродуктивные проблемы демографического развития России. М.: Менеджер здравоохранения; 2012: 53-5. [Starodubov V.I., Sukhanova L.P. Reproductive problems of the demographic development of Russia. M.: Health Manager; 2012: 53-5. (in Russian)].
  18. Redman C.W., Sargent I.L. Latest advances in understanding preeclampsia. Science. 2005; 308(5728): 1592-4. https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1111726.
  19. Aslam H.M., Saleem S., Afzal R., Iqbal U., Saleem S.M., Shaikh M.W.A., Shahid N. Risk factors of birth asphyxia. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2014; 40: 94. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13052-014-0094-2.
  20. Gruslin A., Lemyre B. Pre-eclampsia: Fetal assessment and neonatal outcomes. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2011; 25(4): 491-507. https://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.02.004.
  21. Hassan M., Begum M., Haque S.M.Z., Jahan N., Yasmeen B.H.N., Mannan A. et al. Immediate outcome of neonates with maternal hypertensive disorder of pregnancy at a neonatal intensive care unit. North. Int. Med. Coll. J. 2015; 6(2): 57-60.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2019 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies