Ultrasound during labor: techniques and practical application


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To describe ultrasound imaging techniques during labor and interpretation of ultrasound data to assess the progress of the fetal head through the birth canal as well as decision-making about further labor management tactics. Materials and methods. The paper describes ultrasound imaging techniques during labor to assess the obstetric situation. Results. Ultrasound imaging techniques, a procedure for measuring the angle of progression and distance of passage, direction of movement of the fetal head, distance to the perineum, to the inner surface of the symphysis pubis, the angle of rotation of the fetal head and pubic angle are described. Conclusion. The echographic study allows accurate assessment of fetal head passage during labor. Ultrasound used during labor is an additional tool for diagnosing complications and choosing the labor management tactics.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Andrey Mikchailovich Prikhodko

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: a_prikhodko@oparina4.ru
PhD, physician of the maternity department, assistant of the Department Obstetrics and Gynecology, Researcher of the Innovative Technologies Department of Obstetrics Institute

Andrey Yurievich Romanov

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: romanovi553@yandex.ru
postgraduate student, specialist of R&D Department

Oleg Radomirovich Baev

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)

Email: o_baev@oparina4.ru
MD, Head of maternity department

References

  1. Dupuis O., Silveira R., Zentner A., Dittmar A., Gaucherand P., Cucherat M. et al. Birth simulator: Reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005; 192(3): 868-74.
  2. Мифтахутдинова Д.К., Терегулова Л.Е., Хасанов А.А. Ультразвуковое исследование в родах. Ультразвуковая и функциональная диагностика. 2014; 3: 81-2.
  3. Мифтахутдинова Д.К., Терегулова Л.Е., Галимова И.Р. Протокол ультразвукового исследования в родах. Практическая медицина. 2015; 4-1: 143-6.
  4. Barbera A.F., Pombar X., Peruginoj G., Lezotte D.C., Bobbins J.C. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 33(3): 313-9.
  5. Barbera A.F., Imani F., Becker T., Lezotte D.C., Bobbins J.C. Anatomic relationship between the pubic symphysis and ischial spines and its clinical significance in the assessment of fetal head engagement and station during labor. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 33(3): 320-5.
  6. Kalache K.D., Duckelmann A.M., Michaelis S.A.M., Lange J., Cichon G., Dudenhausen J.W. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the ‘angle of progression’ predict the mode of delivery? Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 33(3): 326-30.
  7. Калачев В.Н., Захаренкова Т.Н. Интрапартальная ультразвуковая диагностика при выборе тактики ведения затянувшегося второго периода родов. Репродуктивное здоровье. Восточная Европа. 2017; 7(3): 342-50.
  8. Мифтахутдинова Д.К., Терегулова Л.Е., Галимова И.Р., Губайдуллина С.В. Значение угла прогрессии для оценки продвижения головки плода во втором периоде родов при трансперинеальном ультразвуковом исследовании. Практическая медицина. 2013; 2: 108-11.
  9. Dietz H.P., Lanzarone V., Simpson J.M. Predicting operative delivery. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2006; 27(4): 409-15.
  10. Gilboa Y., Kivilevitch Z., Spira M., Kedem A., Katorza E., Moran O. et al. Head progression distance in prolonged second stage of labor: relationship with mode of delivery and fetal head station. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 41(4): 436-41.
  11. Henrich W., Dudenhausen J., Fuchs I., Kamena A., Tutschek B. Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2006; 28(6): 753-60.
  12. Tutschek B., Braun T., Chantraine F., Henrich W. A study of progress of labour using intrapartum translabial ultrasound, assessing head station, direction, and angle of descent. BJOG. 2011; 118(1): 62-9.
  13. Ghi T., Farina A., Pedrazzi A., Rizzo N., Pelusi G., Pilu G. Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 33(3): 331-6.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2019 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies