Detection of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare professionals of the National Center during the COVID-19 pandemic (April-June 2020)


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To identify IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare professionals of the National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology during the quarantine from April to June 2020. Materials and methods. The study included 1589 healthcare workers: 1293 professionals of ‘green zone’ and 926 medical staff of‘red zone’. IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in blood serum were determined using SARS-CoV-2-IgG- ELISA kits (National Hematology Research Center, Russia). SARS-CoV-2 RNA was extracted from nasopharyngeal swabs using the kit PROBA-NK(DNA-technology, LLC, Russia). The virus was identified by RT-PCR using SARS-CoV-2/SARS-CoVMultiplex REAL-TIME PCR Detection Kit (DNA-technology, LLC, Russia). Results. IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 were detected in 141 healthcare workers (8.9%), controversial results were revealed in 2professionals, and 1445 (90.9%) workers had no antibodies, including 46 (3.2%) people who had the clinical symptoms of acute respiratory viral disease (ARVI) and identified SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Among healthcare workers with antibodies, the clinical symptoms of ARVI were revealed in 129 (91.5%) workers, they were also detected SARS- CoV-2 RNA; 23 (17.8%) people had clinical symptoms of ARVI but SaRS- CoV-2 RNA was not extracted; 12 (8,5%) workers had neither clinical symptoms of ARVI nor detected SARS- CoV-2 RNA. Conclusion. The presence of IgG antibodies and the absence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the nasopharyngeal swab as well as clinical symptoms of the disease may be suggestive of the fact that the worker had this disease; the presence of IgG antibodies and the absence of SARS- CoV-2 RNA as well as clinical symptoms of the disease may be suggestive of the fact that the worker has this disease.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Lubov V. Krechetova

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: l_krechetova@oparina4.ru
Dr.Med.Sci., Head of the Laboratory of Clinical Immunology

Valentina V. Vtorushina

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: vtorushina@inbox.ru
MD, PhD, immunologist-allergist doctor

Eugenia V. Inviyaeva

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: e_inviyaeva@oparina4.ru
PhD, Senior Researcher of the Laboratory of Clinical Immunology

Tatiana Yu. Ivanets

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: t_ivanets@oparina4.ru
Doctor of Science, MD, PhD, Head of the Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory

Andrey E. Donnikov

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: a_donnikov@oparina4.ru
MD, PhD, Head of Laboratory of molecular genetic methods

Nataliya V. Dolgushina

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: n_dolgushina@oparina4.ru
Doctor of Science, MD., PhD., M.P.H., Head of R&D Department

Gennady T. Sukhikh

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: gtsukhih@mail.ru
MD, PhD, Professor, Academician of Russian Academy of Sciences, Director

References

  1. Xiang F, WangX., He X., Peng Z., Yang B., Zhang J. et al. Antibody detection and dynamic characteristics in patients with COVID-19. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020; Apr. 19: ciaa461. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa461.
  2. Sethuraman N., Jeremiah S.S., Ryo A. Interpreting diagnostic tests for SARS-CoV-2. JAMA. 2020; 323(22): 2249-51. https://dx.doi.org/10.1001/ jama.2020.8259.
  3. Padoan A., Sciacovelli L., Basso D., Negrini D., Zuin S., Cosma C. et al. IgA-Ab response to spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19: A longitudinal study. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2020; 507: 164-6. https://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.04.026.
  4. Wu F., Wang A., Liu M., Wang Q., Chen J., Xia S. et al. Neutralizing antibody responses to SARS-Cov-2 in a COVID-19 recovered patient cohort and their implications. medRxiv. 2020: 2020.03.30.20047365.
  5. Супотницкий М.В. Новый коронавирус SARS-CoV-2 в аспекте глобальной эпидемиологии коронавирусных инфекций. Вестник войск РХБ защиты. 2020; 4(1): 32-65. [M.V. Supotnitskiy. Novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 in the context of global epidemiology of coronavirus infections. Journal of NBC Protection Corps. 2020; 4(1): 32-65. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi. org/10.35825/2587-5728-2020-4-1-32-65.
  6. Takada A., Kawaoka Y. Antibody-dependent enhancement of viral infection: molecular mechanisms and in vivo implications. Rev. Med. Virol. 2003; 13(6): 387-98. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmv.405.
  7. Wang S.F., Tseng S.P., Yen C.H.,Yang J.Y., Tsao C.H., Shen C.W. et al. Antibody-dependent SARS coronavirus infection is mewdiated by antibodies against spike proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014; 451(2): 208-14. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.07.090.
  8. Ulrich H., PittatM.M., TarnokA. Dengue fever, COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2), and antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE): a perspective. Cytometry A. 2020; Jun. 7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.24047.
  9. Peron J.P.S., Nakaya H. Susceptibility of the elderly to SARS-CoV-2 infection: ACE-2 overexpression, shedding, and antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2020; 75: e1912. https://dx.doi.org/10.6061/ clinics/2020/e1912.
  10. Ling L., Lianfeng L., Wei C., Taisheng L. Hypothesis for potential pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection-a review of immune changes in patients with viral pneumonia. Emerg. Microb. Infect. 2020; 9(1): 727-32. https://dx.doi.org/10.1 080/22221751.2020.1746199.
  11. Ye M., Fu D., Ren Y., Wang F., Wang D., Zhang F. et al. Treatment with convalescent plasma for COVID-19 patients in Wuhan. J. Med. Virol. 2020; Apr. 15. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25882.
  12. Tiberghien P., de Lamballerie X., Morel P., Gallian P., Lacombe K., Yazdanpanah Y. Collecting and evaluating convalescent plasma for COVID-19 treatment: Why and How? Review. Vox Sang. 2020; Apr. 2. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ vox.12926.
  13. Barone P., DeSimone R.A. Convalescent plasma to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): considerations for clinical trial design. Review. Transfusion. 2020; 60(6): 1123-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/trf.15843.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies