A differential approach to treating apical prolapse via a vaginal route


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

A differential approach to treating apical prolapse is acquiring high relevance. The article reviews the literature, including randomized trials dedicated to apical prolapse treatment via a vaginal route. Much attention is paid to up-to-date methods for correcting apical prolapse by using native tissues and by applying mesh technologies. Intra- and postoperative complications are described The complex process of choosing a surgical intervention directly depends on the nature and severity of prolapse. Conclusion. It is necessary to take into account the general condition of a woman, her desire to save the uterus, as well as the preferences and capabilities of a surgeon. Knowledge of topographic anatomy, compliance with the implant placement technique, and an individual approach ensure the success of surgical treatment.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Ebecha K. Barinova

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Email: barinovaek@inbox.ru
graduate student

Saadet F. Damirova

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Email: doctorsaadet@gmail.ru
graduate student of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with a course of perinatology

Dmitry G. Aryutin

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia; N.E. Bauman City Clinical Hospital Twenty-Nine, Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: aryutin@mail.ru
Ph.D., Head of the Gynecological Department GBUS «GKB № 29 them N.E. Bauman DM», assistant FPC MR Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with a course of perinatology RUDN

Irina M. Ordiyants

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Email: ordiyantc@mail.ru
Dr. MD., Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with a course of perinatology

Celibi H. Gagaev

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Email: gasanovich@gmail.com
Dr. MD., Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with a course of perinatology

Tatevik N. Zulumyan

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Email: zulum@mail.ru
Ph.D., Assistant of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with a course of perinatology

Elena G. Ordiyants

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

Email: ordiyansflt@mail.ru
Assistant of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductology

References

  1. Barber M. D., Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2013; 24(11): 1783-90.
  2. Russo E., Giannini A., Guevara M.M., Mannella P., Misasi G., Falcone M., Simoncini T. Medium-term outcomes after robotic-assisted lateral suspension with mesh for advanced multi-compartmental prolapse. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2019; Aug. 6.
  3. Sokol A.I., Walters M.D. Pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. In: General gynecology. Mosby; 2007: 543-81. Available at: https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780323032476100231
  4. Jelovsek J.E., Maher C., Barber M.D. Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet. 2007; 369(9566): 1027-38.
  5. Шкарупа Д.Д., Кубин Н.Д., Попов Э.Н., Шаповалова Е.А., Ковалев Г.В., Писарев А.В. Переднеапикальная протезирующая реконструкция тазового дна вагинальным доступом с применением сверхлегкого сетчатого имплантата: 2 года наблюдения. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2018; 67(3): 55-63. [Shkarupa D.D. et al. Anterior apical prosthetic reconstruction of the pelvic floor via a vaginal route by using an ultralight mesh implant: a 2-year follow-up. Zhurnal Akusherstva i Zhenskikh Boleznei (Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases). 2018; 67 (3): 55-63. (in Russian)].
  6. Rooney K., Kenton K., Mueller E.R., FitzGerald M.P., Brubaker L. Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2006; 195(6): 1837-40.
  7. Elliott C.S., Yeh J., Comiter C.V., Chen B., Sokol E.R.The predictive value of a cystocele for concomitant vaginal apical prolapse. J. Urol. 2013; 189(1): 200-3.
  8. ПоповА.А., Краснопольская И.В., Тюрина С.С., Федоров А.А., Слободянюк Б.А. Сакроспинальная фиксация в лечении женщин с пролапсом гениталий в эру mesh-технологий. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2013; 13(2): 36-41. [Popov A.A. et al. Sacrospinal fixation in the treatment of women with genital prolapse in the era of mesh technologies. Rossiyskiy Vestnik Akushera-Ginekologa (Russian Bulletin of the Obstetrician/Gynecologist). 2013; 13 (2): 36-41. (in Russian)].
  9. Беженарь В.Ф., Богатырева Е.В., Цыпурдеева А.А., Цуладзе Л.К., Русина Е.И., Гусева Е.С. Осложнения при коррекции тазового пролапса с использованием проленовой системы Prolift: пути профилактики и качество жизни. Акушерство и гинекология. 2012; 4-2: 116-21. [Bezhenar V.F. et al. Complications from pelvic organ prolapse correction using a Prolift prolene system: ways of prevention and quality of life. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya (Obstetrics and Gynecology). 2012; 4 (2): 116-21. (in Russian)].
  10. Davila G.W. Optimizing safety and appropriateness of graft use in pelvic reconstructive surgery: introduction to the 2nd IUGA Grafts Roundtable. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2012; 23(1): 3-6.
  11. Alas A. N., Anger J. T. Management of apical pelvic organ prolapse. Curr. Urol. Rep. 2015; 16(5): 33.
  12. Dietz V., van der Vaart C.H., van der Graaf Y., Heintz P., Schraffordt Koops S.E. One-year follow-up after sacrospinous hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy for uterine descent: a randomized study. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2010; 21(2): 209-216.
  13. Zucchi A., Lazzeri M., Porena M., Mearini L., Costantini E. Uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapsed surgery. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2010; 7(11): 626-33.
  14. McCall M. Posterior culdoplasty: Surgical correction of enterocele during vaginal hysterectomy; a preliminary report. Obstet. Gynecol. 1957; 10(6): 595-602.
  15. Shull B.L. Pelvic organ prolapse: anterior, superior, and posterior vaginal segment defects. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000; 183(6): 1365-74.
  16. Cosma S., Menato G., Preti M., Petruzzelli P., Tin M.C., Riboni F., Benedetto C. Advanced utero-vaginal prolapse and vaginal vault suspension: synthetic mesh vs native tissue repair. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2014; 289(5): 1053-60.
  17. Choi K.H., Hong J.Y. Management of pelvic organ prolapse. Korean J. Urol. 2014; 55(11): 693-702.
  18. Maher C.F., Murray C.J., Carey M.P., Dwyer P.L., Ugoni A.M. Iliococcygeus or sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001; 98(1): 40-4.
  19. Meeks G.R., Washburne J.F., McGehee R.P., Wiser W.L. Repair of vaginal vault prolapse by suspension of the iliococcygeus (prespinous) fascia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1994; 171(6): 1444-54.
  20. Medina C.A., Croce C., Candiotti K., Takacs P. Comparison of vaginal length after iliococcygeus fixation and sacrospinous ligament fixation. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2008; 100(3): 267-70.
  21. Nichols D.H., Randall C.L. Vaginal surgery. Williams & Wilkins; 1996.
  22. Giberti C. Transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy by palpation - a new minimally invasive procedure using an anchoring system. Urology. 2001; 57(4): 666-8.
  23. Chang W.C., Huang S.C., Sheu B.C., Hsu W.C., Torng P.L., Chow S.N., Chang D. Y. Using Veronikis ligature carrier to simplify transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2006; 85(6): 721-5.
  24. Winkler H.A., Tomeszko J.E., Sand P.K. Anterior sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension for prolapse. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000; 95: 612-5.
  25. Menahem N., Natalia S., Vladimir S., Jacob B. Anterior needle-guided mesh in advanced pelvic organ prolapse: apical fixation on sacrospinous ligaments. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2014; 172: 120-3.
  26. Hefni M.A., El-Toukhy T.A. Long-term outcome of vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for marked uterovaginal and vault prolapse. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2006; 127(2): 257-63.
  27. Kim J.H. Urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery. Int. Neurourol. J. 2015; 19(1): 51.
  28. Paraiso M.F, Ballard L.A., Walters M.D., Lee J.C., Mitchinson A.R. Pelvic support defects and visceral and sexual function in women treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension and pelvic reconstruction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996; 175(6): 1423-31.
  29. Nieminen K., Huhtala H., Heinonen P.K. Anatomic and functional assessment and risk factors of recurrent prolapse after vaginal sacrospinous fixation. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2003; 82(5): 471-8.
  30. Thompson J.R., Gibb J.S., Genadry R., Burrows L., Lambrou N., Butter J.L. Anatomy of pelvic arteries adjacent to the sacrospinous ligament: importance of the coccygeal branch of the inferior gluteal artery. Obstet. Gynecol. 1999; 94(6): 973-7.
  31. Winkler H.A., Tomeszko J.E., Sand P.K. Anterior sacrospinous vaginal vault suspension for prolapse. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000; 95: 612-5.
  32. Petros P.E.P. New ambulatory surgical methods using an anatomical classification of urinary dysfunction improve stress, urge and abnormal emptying. Int. Urogynecol. J. 1997; 8(5): 270-7.
  33. Farnsworth B.N. Posterior intravaginal slingplasty (infracoccygeal sacropexy) for severe posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse - a preliminary report on efficacy and safety. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2002; 13(1): 4-8.
  34. Буянова С.Н., Щукина Н.А., Зубова Е.С., Сибряева В.А., Рижинашвили И.Д. Пролапс гениталий. Российский вестник акушера-гинеколога. 2017; 17(1): 37-45. [Buyanova S.N. et al. Genital prolapse. Rossiyskiy Vestnik Akushera-Ginekologa (Russian Bulletin of the Obstetrician/Gynecologist). 2017; 17 (1): 37-45. (in Russian)].
  35. Шкарупа Д.Д., Безменко А.А., Кубин Н.Д., Шаповалова Е.А., Писарев А.В. Реконструкция купола влагалища и апикальный слинг в хирургическом лечении постгистерэктомического пролапса тазовых органов. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2017; 66(1): 46-55. [Shkarupa D.D. et al. Vaginal vault reconstruction and apical sling in the surgical treatment of post-hysterectomy pelvic organ prolapse. Zhurnal Akusherstva i Zhenskikh Boleznei (Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases). 2017; 66 (1): 46-55. (in Russian)].
  36. Шкарупа Д.Д., Кубин Н.Д., Пешков Н.О., Комяков Б.К., Писарев А.В., Зайцева А.О. Русскоязычные версии опросников для оценки качества жизни больных с пролапсом тазовых органов и стрессовым недержанием мочи. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2016; 1: 94-7. [Shkarupa D.D. et al. Russian-language versions of questionnaires for assessing the quality of life of patients with pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Eksperimentalnaya i Klinicheskaya Urologiya (Experimental and Clinical Urology). 2016; 1: 94-7. (in Russian)].
  37. Carl Heneghan: what's next for the transvaginal mesh? 2019, June 5. Available at: https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2019/06/05/carl-heneghan-what-next-for-transvaginal-mesh
  38. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The FDA is taking steps to protect women's health, ordering manufacturers of surgical mesh designed to transvaginal pelvic organ loss repair to stop selling all devices. 2019, April 19. Available at: https:// www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-action-protect-womens-health-orders-manufacturers-surgical-mesh-intended-transvaginal
  39. Delorme E. OPUR Treatment of anterior prolapse and mid-segment prolapse of genito-urinary tract through vaginal route [DVD]. Saint Etienne: Abiss Company; 2011.
  40. Guyomard A., Delorme E. Transvaginal treatment of anterior or central urogenital prolapse using six tension-free straps and light mesh. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2016; 133(3): 365-9.
  41. Никитин А.Н., Ищенко А.И. Методика opuR® для хирургической коррекции урогенитального пролапса. Первый опыт в России. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2016; 65 (Спецвыпуск): 57-8. [Nikitin A.N., Ishchenko A.I. The opuR® technique for surgical correction of urogenital prolapse. The first experience in Russia. Zhurnal Akusherstva i Zhenskikh Boleznei (Journal of Obstetrics and Women’s Diseases). Special Issue. 2016; LVX: 57-8. (in Russian)].
  42. Kluz T., Wlazlak E., Surkont G. Transvaginal six-arm mesh OPUR in women with apical pelvic organ prolapse-analysis of short-term results, pelvic floor ultrasound evaluation. Ginekol. Pol. 2017; 88(6): 302-6.
  43. Enikeev M.E., Enikeev D.V., Korolev D.O., Snurnitsyna O.V., Lobanov M.V., Nikitin A.N. et al. Repair of cystocele and apical genital prolapse using 6-strap mesh implant. Urologia. 2019; Dec. 16: 391560319890999. https://dx.doi. org/10.1177/0391560319890999.
  44. Gauthier A., Ferry P., Bertherat P., De Tayrac R., Fernandez H. Transvaginal treatment of anterior and apical genital prolapse using Restorelle® direct fix™: An observational study of medium-term complications and outcomes. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 2019; 47(9): 443-9.
  45. Чурсин В.В., Жорова В.Е., Буралкина Н.А., Чурсин Д.В., Чупрынин В.Д. Взгляд хирурга на нерешенные вопросы пролапса тазовых органов. Гинекология. 2018; 20(1): 88-91. [Chursin V.V. et al. The surgeon’s look at the unresolved issues of pelvic organ prolapse. Ginekologiya (Gynecology). 2018; 20 (1): 88-91. (in Russian)].
  46. Гаспаров А.С., Бабичева И.А., Дубинская Е.Д., Лаптева Н.В., Дорфман М.Ф. Хирургическое лечение пролапса тазовых органов. Казанский медицинский журнал. 2014; 95(3): 341-7. [Gasparov A.S. et al. Surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse. Kazanskiy Meditsinskiy Zhurnal (Kazan Medical Journal). 2014; 95 (3): 341-7. (in Russian)].
  47. Гвоздев М.Ю., Тупикина Н.В., Касян Г.Р., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Пролапс тазовых органов в клинической практике врача-уролога. Методические рекомендации №3. 2016. [Gvozdev M.Yu., Tupikina N.V., Kasyan G.R., Pushkar D.Yu. Pelvic organ prolapse in the clinical practice of a urologist. Methodical Recommendations No. 3. 2016. (in Russian)].
  48. Lua L.L., Vicente E.D., Pathak P., Lybbert D., Dandolu V. Comparative analysis of overall cost and rate of healthcare utilization among apical prolapse procedures. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2017; 28(10): 1481-8.
  49. Betschart C., Cervigni M., Contreras Ortiz O., Doumouchtsis S.K., Koyama M., Medina C. et al. Management of apical compartment prolapse (uterine and vault prolapse): A FIGO Working Group report. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2017; 36(2): 507-13.
  50. Jha S., Cutner A, Moran P. The UK national prolapse survey: 10 years on. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2018; 29(6): 795-801.
  51. Jelovsek J.E., Barber M.D., Brubaker L., Norton P., Gantz M., Richter H.E. et al. Effect of uterosacral ligament suspension vs sacrospinous ligament fixation with or without perioperative behavioral therapy for pelvic organ vaginal prolapse on surgical outcomes and prolapse symptoms at 5 years in the OPTIMAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018; 319(15): 1554-65.
  52. Citgez S., Oncul M., Demirdag C., Ercili B., Cetinel B. Does being performed by urologist or gynecologist affect the outcomes of women who have had sacrocolpopexy? Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2019; 237: 64-7.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies