Endometrial microbiota and reproductive outcome in assisted reproductive technology program


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the effect of uterine microbiota on the success of embryo implantation in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). Patients and methods. The investigation enrolled 80 infertile patients who had undergone IVF programs. Group 1 included 50 patients who had embryos transferred in the stimulation cycle; Group 2 consisted of 30 patients with embryos transferred in the cryo cycle. The women’s mean age was 31.4±1.5 years. The outer walls of an embryo catheter removed from the uterine cavity after embryo transfer were microbiologically tested by culturomics using an expanded set of selective and non-selective culture media. Results. Twenty-seven bacterial species were isolated in Group 1 patients. Pregnancy occurred in 20 (40.0%) women. Lactobacilli, the most abundant bacteria, were detected in 85% of women. Among the opportunistic microorganisms (OMs) in 50.0% of patients, the most common species were Gardnerella vaginalis (G. vaginalis) and Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) in 20.0% of women and Streptococcus anginosus (S. anginosus) in 15.0%. The isolation rate of Lactobacilli was lower in non-pregnant women (60.0%) than in pregnant women (73.3%). The OMs (46.6%), showed a preponderance of G. vaginalis (10.0%) and facultative anaerobic microorganisms, such as S. anginosus (10.0%), Staphylococcus haemolyticus (6.6%), an Actinomyces sp. (6.6%); Haemophilus influenzae (3.3%) is rarely isolated from the genitals. Twenty bacterial species were detected in Group 2 women. Pregnancy occurred in 13 (43.3%) patients. The most abundant bacteria Lactobacilli were isolated in 69.2% of women. The OMs (38.5%) displayed a preponderance of facultative anaerobic microorganisms, such as Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) with an equal rate (15.4%). In non-pregnant women (56.7%), the isolation rate of Lactobacilli was 64.7%. Facultative anaerobes, such as S. epidermidis (17.6%) and E. faecalis (11.8%), were most commonly isolated among the OM (41.2%). Bifidobacteria were found in 35.3% of women and Actinomyces neuii were detected in 5.9%. Conclusion. The investigation showed that the best implantation results among 33pregnant women were observed with uterine colonization by only Lactobacilli (42.4%). When the uterus was colonized by Lactobacilli in association with OM, the pregnancy rate was 36.4%, whereas it was 9.1% when it was colonized only by OM. In the absence of endometrial colonization, pregnancy also occurred in only 9.1% of cases.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

L. K Keburia

National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov

Email: tati-keburiya@yandex.ru
Post-graduate student, Department of assistive technologies in infertility treatment 4, Oparina str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

V. Yu Smolnikova

National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov

Email: v_smolnikova@oparina4.ru
PhD, Leading researcher, Department of Assistive technologies in infertility treatment 4, Oparina str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

T. V Priputnevich

National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov

Email: t_priputnevich@oparina4.ru
Head of Microbiology, Clinical pharmacology and Epidemiology Department 4, Oparina str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

V. V Muravyeva

National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov

Email: v_muravieva@oparina4.ru
Researcher of Microbiology, Clinical pharmacology and Epidemiology Department 4, Oparina str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

E. A Kalinina

National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov

Email: e_kalinina@oparina4.ru
Head of Department of Assistive technologies in infertility treatment 4, Oparina str., Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation

References

  1. Perez-Munoz M.E., Arrieta M.C., Ramer-Tait A.E., Walter J. A critical assessment of the “sterile womb” and “in utero colonization” hypotheses: implications for research on the pioneer infant microbiome. Microbiome. 2017; 5(1): 48. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0268-4.
  2. Franasiak J.M., Scott R.T. Endometrial microbiome. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017; 29(3): 146-52. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GC0.0000000000000357.
  3. Moreno I., Franasiak J.M. Endometrial microbiota-new player in town. Fertil. Steril. 2017; 108(1): 32-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.034.
  4. Franasiak J.M., Werner M.D., Juneau C.R., Tao X., Landis J., Zhan Y. et al. Endometrial microbiome at the time of embryo transfer: next-generation sequencing of the 16S ribosomal subunit. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2016; 33(1): 129-36. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0614-z.
  5. Einenkel R., Zygmunt M., Muzzio D.O. Microorganisms in the healthy upper reproductive tract: from denial to beneficial assignments for reproductive biology. Reprod. Biol. 2019; 19(2): 113-8. https://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.repbio.2019.04.001.
  6. Hooper L.V., Littman D.R., Macpherson A.J. Interactions between the microbiota and the immune system. Science. 2012; 336(6086):1268-73. https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1223490.
  7. D’Ippolito S., Di Nicuolo F., Pontecorvi A., Gratta M., Scambia G., Di Simone N. Endometrial microbes and microbiome: Recent insights on the inflammatory and immune players” of the human endometrium. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2018; 80(6): e13065. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aji.13065.
  8. Benner M., Ferwerda G., Joosten I., van der Molen R.G. How uterine microbi ota might be responsible for a receptive, fertile endometrium. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2018; 24(4): 393-415. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmy012.
  9. Кондриков Н.И. Патология матки: атлас. М.: Практическая медицина; 2008.
  10. Glasser S.R., Aplin J.D. The endometrium. London: Taylor and Francis; 2002.
  11. Littman D.R., Pamer E.G. Role of the commensal microbiota in normal and pathogenic host immune responses. Cell Host Microbe. 2011; 10(4): 311-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2011.10.004.
  12. Geva-Zatorsky N., Sefik E., Kua L., Pasman L., Tan T.G., Ortiz-Lopez A. et al. Mining the human gut microbiota for immunomodulatory organisms. Cell. 2017; 168(5):928-43. e11. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cell.2017.01.022.
  13. Mitchell C.M., Haick A., Nkwopara E., Garcia R., Rendi M., Agnew K. et al. Colonization of the upper genital tract by vaginal bacterial species in nonpregnant women. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 212(5): e611-9. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.043.
  14. Cicineli E., Ballini A., Marinaccio M., Poliseno A. Coscia M.F., Monno R., De Vito D. Microbiological findings in endometrial specimen: our experience. Arch.Gynecol. Obstet. 2012; 285(5): 1325-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2138-9.
  15. Cicine Ui E., De Ziegler D, Nicoletti R., Colafiglio G., Saliani N., Resta L. et al. Chronic endometritis: correlation among hysteroscopic, histologic, and bacteriologic findings in a prospective trial with 2190 consecutive office hysteroscopies. Fertil. Steril. 2008; 89(3): 677-84. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. fertnstert.2007.03.074.
  16. Cicinelli E, Matteo M, Tinelli R., Pinto V., Marinaccio M., Indraccolo U. et al. Chronic endometritis due to common bacteria is prevalent in women with recurrent miscarriage as confirmed by improved pregnancy outcome after antibiotic treatment. Reprod. Sci. 2014; 21(5): 640-7. https://dx.doi. org/10.1177/1933719113508817.
  17. Cicinelli E, Resta L, Nicoletti R., Zappimbulso V., Tartagni M., Saliani N. Endometrial micropolyps at fluid hysteroscopy suggest the existence of chronic endometritis. Hum. Reprod. 2005; 20(5): 1386-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ humrep/deh779.
  18. Cicinelli E., Trojano G., Mastromauro M., Vimercati A., Marinaccio M., Mitola P.C. et al. Higher prevalence of chronic endometritis in women with endometriosis: a possible etiopath ogenetic link. Fertil. Steril. 2017; 108(2): 289-95. e1. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert. 2017.05.016.
  19. Moreno I., Codoner F.M., Vilella F., Valbuena D., Martinez-Blanch J.F., Jimenez-Almazan J. et al. Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 215(6): 684-703. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.09.075.
  20. Tao X., Franasiak J.M., Zhan Y., Scott R.T., III, Rajchel J., Bedard J. et al. Characterizing the endometrial microbiome by analyzing the ultra-low bacteria from embryo transfer catheter tips in IVF cycles: next generation sequencing (NGS) analysis of the 16S ribosomal gene. Hum. Microb. J. 2017; 3: 15-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.humic.2017.01.004.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2020 Bionika Media