Use of cryopreserved embryos in assisted reproductive technology programs
- Authors: Petrosyan Y.A1, Frolova A.M1, Syrkasheva A.G1
-
Affiliations:
- Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
- Issue: No 4 (2020)
- Pages: 195-200
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/248968
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.4.195-200
- ID: 248968
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
Overall success rates for cryopreserved embryo transfer have increased over the past few years. The paper gives data on the higher eff iciency of cryo protocols versus fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) protocols. It demonstrates the greater contribution of cryopreserved embryo transfer to the total number of live births over the past decades. Moreover, clinical and embryological tactics during the IVF program using cryopreserved embryos are not clearly def ined. The effectiveness of assisted embryological techniques in the transfer of cryopreserved embryos has not been studied. There is a high variability in the protocols for preparing the endometrium for cryotransfer, including differences in dose, routes of administration, duration of use of drugs, and the first day of progesterone administration. Despite a large number of studies in this area, all of them are retrospective. In addition, the cost-effectiveness of the widespread use of cyclic hormone therapy has not been investigated. All of the above necessitates further study of this problem.
Full Text
About the authors
Ya. A Petrosyan
Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: Yana_petrosyan86@mail.ru
PhD student of the IVF Department 4, Oparina str, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation
A. M Frolova
Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: a_frolova@oparina4.ru
embryologist of IVF Department. 4, Oparina str, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation
A. G Syrkasheva
Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
Email: a_syrkasheva@oparina4.ru
M.D., Ph.D., Senior Researcher of the IVF Department 4, Oparina str, Moscow, 117997, Russian Federation
References
- Gook D.A., Edgar D.H. Cryopreservation of female reproductive potential. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2019; 55: 23-36. https://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.08.005.
- Pandian Z., Templeton A, Serour G., Bhattacharya S. Number of embryos for transfer after IVF and ICSI: a cochrane review. Hum. Reprod. 2005; 20(10): 2681-7.
- Edgar D.H., Gook D.A. A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2012; 18(5): 536-54. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/ dms016.
- Долгушина Н.В., Ибрагимова Э.О., Романов А.Ю., Бурменская О.В., Макарова Н.П., Шафеи Р.А., Сыркашева А.Г. Предикторы эффективности спонтанного хетчинга бластоцист человека в программах вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Акушерство и гинекология. 2018; 2: 88-95.
- Groenewoud E.R., Cantineau A.E.P., Kollen B.J., Macklon N.S., Cohlen B.J. What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2017; 23(2): 255-61. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/ dmw046.
- Rienzi L., Gracia C, Maggiulli R., LaBarbera A.R., Kaser D.J., Ubaldi F.M. et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2017; 23(2): 139-55. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmw038.
- Kaye L., Will E.A., Bartolucci A., Nulsen J., Benadiva C., Engmann L. Pregnancy rates for single embryo transfer (SET) of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts after cryopreservation by vitrification and slow freeze. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2017; 34(7): 913-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-0940-4.
- Somoskoi B., Kriston R., Cseh S., Konc J., Kanyo K. Cryopreservation of embryos and oocytes in human assisted reproduction. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014; 2014: 307268. https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/307268.
- Kleinhans F.W., Mazur P. Comparison of actual vs. synthesized ternary phase diagrams for solutes of cryobiological interest. Cryobiology. 2007; 54(2): 212-22. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2007.01.007.
- Паращук В.Ю., Луцкий А.С.,Грищенко Н.Г.Эффективность разных протоколов подготовки эндометрия при переносе витрифицированных/отогретых эмбрионов. Здоровье женщины. 2017; 2: 30.
- Li Z., Wang Y.A., Ledger W., Edgar D.H., Sullivan E.A. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study. Hum. Reprod. 2014; 29(12): 2794-801. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu246.
- Zeng M., Su S., Li L. The effect of laser-assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes of cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lasers Med. Sci. 2018; 33(3): 655-66. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2372-x.
- Ибрагимова Э.О., Долгушина Н.В., Сыркашева А.Г., Романов А.Ю., Языкова О.И., Макарова Н.П. Роль вспомогательного хетчинга в программах лечения бесплодия методами вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий: обзор литературы. Гинекология. 2016; 18(2): 44-7.
- Syrkasheva A.G., Dolgushina N.V., Romanov A.Y., Burmenskaya O.V., Makarova N.P., Ibragimova E.O., Kalinina E.A., Sukhikh G.T. Cell and genetic predictors of human blastocyst hatching success in assisted reproduction. Zygote. 2017; 25(5): 631-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0967199417000508.
- Drakopoulos P., Mat C., Polyzos N.P., Santos-Ribeiro S., van de Vijver A., Van Landuyt L. et al. The impact of elevated progesterone on the initiation of an artificially prepared frozen embryo transfer cycle: a case series. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2017; 18(8): 619-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.2174/13892010186661 70808125834.
- Quenby S., Brosens J.J. Human implantation: a tale of mutual maternal and fetal attraction. Biol. Reprod. 2013; 88(3): 81. https://dx.doi.org/10.1095/ biolreprod.113.108886.
- Demir B., Dilbaz S., Cinar O., Ozdegirmenci O., Dede S., Dundar B., Goktolga U. Estradiol supplementation in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with thin endometrium. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2013;29(1): 42-5. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.3109/09513590.2012.705381.
- Kasius A., Smit J.G., Torrance H.L., Eijkemans M.J.C., Mol B.W., Opmeer B.C., Broekmans F.J. Endometrial thickness and pregnancy rates after IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2014; 20(4): 530-41. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmu011.
- Bu Z., Wang K., Dai W., Sun Y. Endometrial thickness significantly affects clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2016; 32(7): 524-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/0951359 0.2015.1136616.
- Mahajan N., Kaur S., Alonso M.R. Window of implantation is significantly displaced in patients with adenomyosis with previous implantation failure as determined by endometrial receptivity assay. J. Hum. Reprod. Sci. 2018; 11(4): 353-8. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_52_18.
- Park C.W., Choi M.H., Yang K.M., Song I.O. Pregnancy rate in women with adenomyosis undergoing fresh or frozen embryo transfer cycles following gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment. Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med. 2016; 43(3): 169-73. https://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2016.43.3.169.
- Halasz M., Szekeres-Bartho J. The role of progesterone in implantation and trophoblast invasion. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2013; 97(1): 43-50. https://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.jri.2012.10.011.
- Kalem Z, Kalem M.N., Gurgan T. Methods for endometrial preparation in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. J. Turk. Ger. Gynecol. Assoc. 2016; 17(3): 168-72. https://dx.doi.org/10.5152/jtgga.2016.15214.
- Kalem Z, Kalem M.N., Bakirarar B., Kent E., Gurgan T. Natural cycle versus hormone replacement therapy cycle in frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Saudi Med. J. 2018; 39(11): 1102-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2018.11.23299.
- Bjuresten K., Landgren B.M., Hovatta O., Stavreus-Evers A. Luteal phase progesterone increases live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril. 2011; 95(2): 534-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.fertnstert.2010.05.019.
- Available at: https://www.focusonreproduction.eu/article/ESHRE-News-Freeze-all-2. 2019
Supplementary files
