Differentiated approach to the embryological stage in frozenthawed embryo transfer


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of additional embryological techniques in frozen-thawed embryo transfer programs. Materials and methods. The study included 288 couples treated for infertility using assisted reproductive technologies (ART) with frozen-thawed embryo transfer. The couples were stratified into two groups depending on the onset of pregnancy: group 1 consisted of couples who achieved pregnancy (pregnancy +, n=92), group 2 included the couples who did not achieve pregnancy (pregnancy -, n=196). The influence of the embryological stage on the effectiveness of ART programs was evaluated. Results. The use of pronase hatching increases the ART effectiveness in patients under 33 years by 3.3 times and the use of pronase hatching reduces the pregnancy rate in patients aged 34 years and older, while laser hatching increases the pregnancy rate by 4.8 times. The use of a culture medium enriched with hyaluronic acid (Embryoglue) increases the pregnancy rate in patients aged 38 years and older and in patients with previous history of three or more ineffective embryo transfer cycles. Prolonged embryo cultivation after thawing and before embryo transfer to the uterine cavity does not influence the effectiveness of frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Conclusion. None of the additional embryological techniques has shown its effectiveness in its regular use. Further research should be aimed at identifying groups of patients who need to be recommended certain modern embryological techniques, as well as their combinations.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Yana A. Petrosyan

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russia

Email: yana_petrosyan86@mail.ru
postgraduate student

Anastasiya G. Syrkasheva

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russia

Email: anast.syrkasheva@gmail.com
M.D., PhD., Senior researcher of ART Department

Andrey Yu. Romanov

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russia

Email: romanov1553@yandex.ru
MD, Researcher of R&D Department

Nataliya P. Makarova

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russia

Email: np_makarova@oparina4.ru
PhD, Leading Researcher of IVF Department

Elena A. Kalinina

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Healthcare of Russia

Email: e_kalinina@oparina4.ru
M.D., PhD, Head of IVF Department

References

  1. Сыркашева А.Г., Казакова В.В., Долгушина Н.В., Романов А.Ю., Андреева М.Г., Яроцкая Е.Л. Реализация программ вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий у пациенток с агрегатами гладкого эндоплазматического ретикулума в цитоплазме ооцитов. Акушерство и гинекология. 2016; 7: 54-9. [Syrkasheva A.G., Kazakova V.V., Dolgushina N.V., Romanov A.Yu., Andreeva M.G., Yarotskaya E.L. Implementation of assisted reproductive technology programs in patients with smooth endoplasmic reticulum aggregates in the cytoplasm of oocytes. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016; (7): 54-9. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2016.7.54-59.
  2. Ковальская Е.В., Сыркашева А.Г., Романов А.Ю., Макарова Н.П., Долгушина Н.В. Современные представления о компактизации эмбри онов человека в условиях in vitro. Технологии живых систем. 2017; 1: 25-35. [Kovalskaya E.V., Syrkasheva A.G.,Romanov A.Yu., Makarova N.P., Dolgushina N.V. Modern concepts of compaction of human embryos in vitro. Journal Technologies of Living Systems. 2017; (1): 25-35. (in Russian)].
  3. Романов А.Ю., Ковальская Е.В., Макарова Н.П., Сыркашева А.Г., Долгушина Н.В. Использование цейтраферной съемки для оценки качества эмбрионов человека в программах экстракорпорального оплодотворения. Цитология. 2017; 59(7): 462-6. [Romanov A.Yu., Kovalskaya E.V., Makarova N.P., Syrkasheva A.G., Dolgushina N.V. Use of time-lapse imaging to assess the quality of human embryos in the IVF cycles. Cytology. 2017; 59(7):462-6. (in Russian)].
  4. Романов А.Ю., Силачев Д.Н., Макарова Н.П., Долгушина Н.В. Влияние механической микровибрации на качество эмбрионов человека при культивировании in vitro и исходы программ вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Клеточные технологии в биологии и медицине. 2018; 2: 86-90. [Romanov A.Yu., Silachev D.N., Makarova N.P., Dolgushina N.V. The influence of mechanical microvibration on the quality of human embryos during in vitro cultivation and the outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies programs. Cell technologies in biology and medicine. 2018; (2):86-90. (in Russian)].
  5. Romanov A.Yu., Silachev D.N., Makarova N.P., Dolgushina N.V. Effect of Mechanical Microvibration on the Quality of Human Embryos during In Vitro Culturing and Outcomes of Assisted Reproduction Technologies. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2018; 165(4):544-7.
  6. Романов А.Ю., Фролова А.М., Макарова Н.П., Долгушина Н.В. Первый российский опыт применения управляемой механической микровибрации при культивировании эмбрионов человека в программах вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Акушерство и гинекология. 2019; 12: 120-5. [Romanov A.Yu., Frolova A.M., Makarova N.P., Dolgushina N.V. The first Russian experience of using controlled mechanical microvibration in the cultivation of human embryos in programs of assisted reproductive technologies. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019; (12): 120-5. (in Russian)]. https:// dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2019.12.120-125.
  7. Datta A.K., Campbell S., Deval B., Nargund G. Add-ons in IVF programme - hype or hope? Facts Views Vis. ObGyn. 2015; 7(4): 241-50.
  8. Harper J., Jackson E., Sermon K., Aitken R.J., Harbottle S., Mocanu E. et al. Adjuncts in the IVF laboratory: where is the evidence for “add-on" interventions? Hum. Reprod. 2017; 32(3): 485-91. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ humrep/dex004.
  9. Zemyarska M.S. Is it ethical to provide IVF add-ons when there is no evidence of a benefit if the patient requests it? J. Med. Ethics. 2019; 45(5): 346-50. https:// dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-104983.
  10. Gleicher N., Kushnir V.A., Barad D.H. Worldwide decline of IVF birth rates and its probable causes. Hum. Reprod. Open. 2019; 2019(3): hoz017. https:// dx.doi.org/ 10.1093/hropen/hoz017.
  11. Наими З.М.С., Калинина Е.А., Донников А.Е., Алиева K.y., Дударова А.Х., Тухватуллина Я.А. Эффективность программ вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий при переносе эмбрионов в стимулированном цикле по сравнению с переносом криоконсервированных/размороженных эмбрионов. Акушерство и гинекология. 2016; 6: 11-7. https:// dx.doi.org/ 10.18565/aig.2016.6.11-17.
  12. Кравчук Я.Н., Калугина А.С., Зубова Ю.Г. Применение методов криоконсервации эмбрионов в программах вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Акушерство и гинекология. 2012; (8-2): 80-4.
  13. Rienzi L.F., Iussig B., Dovere L., Fabozzi G., Cimadomo D., Ubaldi F.M. Perspectives in gamete and embryo cryopreservation. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2018; 36(5): 253-64. https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1677463.
  14. Levi-Setti P.E., Patrizio P., Scaravelli G. Evolution of human oocyte cryopreservation: slow freezing versus vitrification. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 2016; 23(6): 445-50. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.1097/ MED.0000000000000289.
  15. Konc J., Kanyo K., Kriston R., Somoskoi B., Cseh S. Cryopreservation of embryos and oocytes in human assisted reproduction. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014; 2014: 307268. https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/307268.
  16. Kaye L., Will E.A., Bartolucci A., Nulsen J., Benadiva C., Engmann L. Pregnancy rates for single embryo transfer (SET) of day 5 and day 6 blastocysts after cryopreservation by vitrification and slow freeze. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2017; 34(7): 913-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-0940-4.
  17. Edgar D.H., Gook D.A. A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2012; 18(5): 536-54. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dms016.
  18. Pandian Z., Templeton A., Serour G., Bhattacharya S. Number of embryos for transfer after IVF and ICSI: a Cochrane review. Hum. Reprod. 2005; 20(10): 2681-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei153.
  19. Wang H., Ou Z., Chen Z., Yang L., Sun L. Influence of different postthaw culture time on the clinical outcomes of different quality embryos. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2019; 28(4): 523-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.17219/ acem/91010.
  20. Ибрагимова Э.О., Долгушина Н.В., Сыркашева А.Г., Романов А.Ю., Языкова О.И., Макарова Н.П. Роль вспомогательного хетчинга в программах лечения бесплодия методами вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий: обзор литературы. Гинекология. 2016; 18(2): 44-7.
  21. Шафеи РА., Сыркашева А.Г., Романов А.Ю.,Макарова Н.П., Долгушина Н.В., Семенова М.Л. Хетчинг бластоцисты у человека. Онтогенез. 2017; 48(1): 8-20.
  22. Syrkasheva A.G., Dolgushina N.V., Romanov A.Yu., Burmenskaya O.V., Makarova N.P., Ibragimova E.O. et al. Cell and genetic predictors of human blastocyst hatching success in assisted reproduction. Zygote. 2017; 25(5): 631-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0967199417000508.
  23. Shafei R.A., Syrkasheva A.G., Romanov A.Y., Makarova N.P., Dolgushina N. V., Semenova M.L. Blastocyst hatching in humans. Russ. J. Dev. Biol. 2017; 48(1): 5-15. https://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S1062360417010106.
  24. Долгушина Н.В., Ибрагимова Э.О., Романов А.Ю., Макарова Н.П., Довгань А.А., Сыркашева А.Г., Калинина Е.А. Роль проназного хетчинга в повышении эффективности программ вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Акушерство и гинекология. 2018; 3: 70-4. [Dolgushina N.V., Ibragimova E.O., Romanov A.Yu., Makarova N.P., Dovgan A.A., Syrkasheva A.G. The role of pronase hatching in improving the efficiency of assisted reproductive technology programs. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018; (3):70-5. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2018.3.70-74.
  25. Долгушина Н.В., Ибрагимова Э.О., Романов А.Ю., Бурменская О.В., Макарова Н.П., Шафеи Р.А., Сыркашева А.Г. Предикторы эффективности спонтанного хетчинга бластоцист человека в программах вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Акушерство и гинекология. 2018; 2: 88-95. [Dolgushina N.V., Ibragimova E.O., Romanov A.Yu., Bourmenskaya O.V., Makarova N.P., Schaffei R.A. Predictors of the effectiveness of spontaneous hatching of human blastocysts in assisted reproductive technology programs. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018; (2):88-95. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi. org/10.18565/aig.2018.2.88-95.
  26. Романов А.Ю., Макарова Н.П., Долгушина Н.В., Калинина Е.А. Культуральная среда, обогащенная гиалуроновой кислотой, при переносе эмбрионов в программах вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий: механизм действия и показания к применению. Акушерство и гинекология. 2018; 12: 12-6. [Romanov A.Yu., Makarova N.P., Dolgushina N.V., Kalinina E.A. Culture medium enriched with hyaluronic acid for embryo transfer in programs of assisted reproductive technologies: mechanism of action and indications for use. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018; (12):12-6. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2018.12.12-16.
  27. Li Y.J., Chen J.H., Sun P., Li J.J., Liang X. Y. Intrafollicular soluble RAGE benefits embryo development and predicts clinical pregnancy in infertile patients of advanced maternal age undergoing in vitro fertilization. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci.Technolog. Med. Sci. 2017; 37(2): 243-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11596-017-1722-z.
  28. Munne S. Status of preimplantation genetic testing and embryo selection. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2018; 37(4): 393-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. rbmo.2018.08.001.
  29. Garcia-Ferreyra J., Hilario R., Duenas J. High percentages of embryos with 21, 18 or 13 trisomy are related to advanced paternal age in donor egg cycles. JBRA Assist. Reprod. 2018; 22(1): 26-34. https://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20180004.
  30. Kristensen S.G., Humaidan P., Coetzee K. Mitochondria and reproduction: possibilities for testing and treatment. Panminerva Med. 2019; 61(1): 82-96.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies