Modern ideas about the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Over 100 years ago, endometriosis was described as endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus. There are many theories to explain endometriosis. Understanding the pathogenesis of any disease helps find the key to treatment. The evidence-based approach to endometriosis requires special consideration. Endometriosis is often ruled out because of the negative results of studies, including imaging, which results in a well-known diagnostic delay in the disease. Drug therapy is offered to relieve pain, to prevent new lesions or recurrences, and is prescribed as a self-treatment or as a second stage after surgery. In Russia, hormone therapy for endometriosis is used by only 24% of the women, for whom this is indicated. Informing women about their disease, the duration of treatment, possible side effects of hormone therapy, and ways to solve these problems will be able to reduce the risk of self-discontinuation of drugs and subsequent recurrences of endometriosis. Gestagen monotherapy to minimize the risk of progression of endometrioid lesions seems to be a more reasonable solution in the treatment of patients. The possible growth of lesions during therapy should be monitored and, if pain relief is inadequate, other options should be considered. Dydrogesterone is highly effective and safe in endometriosis; this allows you to take into account all the wishes of patients, which makes it possible to continue treatment for endometriosis for a long time before and after implementing reproductive plans, as well as before menopause.

Conclusion: Understanding the etiology and pathogenesis of endometriosis, timely diagnosis, and prescription of effective therapy with a high safety profile and with the ability to individually approach each patient will be able to alleviate symptoms, to improve quality of life, and to reduce the risk of recurrences in women suffering from this pathology.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Svetlana O. Dubrovina

Rostov State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: s.dubrovina@gmail.com

Professor, Dr. Med. Sci., Professor at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 1; Chief Researcher, Obstetrics and Pediatrics Research Institute; Professor at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with the course IDPO

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

Yulia D. Berlim

Rostov-on-Don City Hospital No. 6

Email: juliaberlim@yandex.ru

PhD, Deputy Chief Physician for Medical Affairs; Associate Professor at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with the course IDPO

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

Anna D. Alexandrina

Rostov-on-Don City Emergency Hospital

Email: anna221215@inbox.ru

obstetrician-gynecologist

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

Marina A. Vovkochina

Rostov State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: jordan-85@inbox.ru

obstetrician-gynecologist, Obstetrics and Pediatrics Research Institute

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

Diana Yu. Bogunova

Rostov State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: bogunovadi@yandex.ru

obstetrician-gynecologist, Obstetrics and Pediatrics Research Institute

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

Vitaliy S. Gimbut

Professor Bushtyreva’s Clinic LLC

Email: med@rostov.ru

PhD, obstetrician-gynecologist & ultrasound imaging, Head of the Ultrasound Imaging Department

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

Darya M. Bozhinskaya

Rostov State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: dasha.bozhinskaya@yandex.ru

obstetrician-gynecologist, Obstetrics and Pediatrics Research Institute

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

References

  1. Amro B., Aristondo M.E.R., Alsuwaidi S., Almaamari B., Hakim Z., Tahlak M. et al. New understanding of diagnosis, treatment and prevention of endometriosis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022; 19(11): 6725. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116725.
  2. Koninckx P.R., Ussia A., Wattiez A., Adamyan L., Martin D.C., Gordts S. The severity and frequency distribution of endometriosis subtypes at different ages: a model to understand the natural history of endometriosis based on single centre/single surgeon data. Facts Views Vis. Obgyn. 2021; 13(3): 209-19. https://dx.doi.org/10.52054/ FVVO.13.3.028.
  3. Koninckx P., Ussia A., Keckstein J., Adamyan L., Donnez J., Martin D., Wattiez A. Hierarchy of evidence for endometriosis diagnosis and surgery. Authorea. May 16, 2022. https://dx.doi.org/10.22541/au.165268818.82166961/v1.
  4. Goodman L.R., Franasiak J.M. Efforts to redefine endometriosis prevalence in low-risk patients. BJOG. 2018;125(1): 63. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ 1471-0528.14701.
  5. ESHRE. ESHRE Guideline Endometriosis. 2 February, 2022.
  6. Muzii L., Miller C.E. The singer, not the song. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2011; 18(5): 666-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2011.06.016.
  7. Dubrovina S.O., Berlim Yu.D., Vovkochina M.A., Aleksandrina A.D., Bogomolova K.R. Pre- and postoperative drug therapy in patients with ovarian endometrioid cysts: a retrospective cohort study. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021; (5): 146-52. (in Russian). https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/ aig.2021.5.146-152.
  8. Koninckx P.R., Fernandes R., Ussia A., Schindler L., Wattiez A., Al-Suwaidi S. et al. Pathogenesis based diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne). 2021; 12: 745548. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.745548.
  9. Imboden S., Bollinger Y., Härmä K., Knabben L., Fluri M., Nirgianakis K. et al. Predictive factors for voiding dysfunction after surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2021; 28(8): 1544-51. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2021.01.009.
  10. Koninckx P.R., Ussia A., Keckstein J., Malzoni M., Adamyan L., Wattiez A. Review on endometriosis surgery. Gynecol. Pelvic. Med. 2021 December 25: 4. https://dx.doi.org/10.21037/gpm-21-17.
  11. Koninckx P.R., Martin D.C., Donnez J. Do we need to separate initiation and growth to understand endometriosis? Fertil. Steril. 2020; 114(4): 766-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.06.008.
  12. Makiyan Z. Endometriosis origin from primordial germ cells. Organogenesis. 2017; 13(3): 95-102. 10.1080/15476278.2017.1323162.
  13. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Clinical guidelines. Endometriosis. Мoscow; 2016. (in Russian).
  14. Dubrovina S.O., Berlim Yu.D., Aleksandrina A.D., Vovkochina M.A., Tsirkunova N.S., Bogunova D.Yu. Endometriosis in routine practice: analysis of clinical cases. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2022; (6): 152-61. (in Russian). https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/ aig.2022.6.152-161.
  15. Ulumbekova G.E., Khludova I.Yu. Demographic, social and economic effects of hormonal therapy in endometriosis and abnormal uterine bleeding. HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT: News, Views, Education. Bulletin of VSHOUZ. 2022; 8(1): 82-113. (in Russian). https://dx.doi.org/10.33029/ 2411-8621-2022-8-1-82-113.
  16. Bezhenar V.F., Kruglov S.Yu., Kuzmina N.S., Krylova Yu.S., Sergienko A.S., Abilbekova A.K., Zhemchuzhina T.Yu. Effectiveness of long-term hormone therapy for endometriosis after surgical treatment. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2021; (4): 134-42. (in Russian). https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/ aig.2021.4.134-142.
  17. De Cicco Nardone A., Carfagna P., De Cicco Nardone C., Scambia G., Marana R., De Cicco Nardone F. Laparoscopic ethanol sclerotherapy for ovarian endometriomas: preliminary results. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol. 2020; 27(6): 1331-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.792.
  18. Schindler L., Schindler S., Anastasia U., Gordts S., Wattiez A., Koninckx P.R. Cystic ovarian endometriosis and infertility: arguments for an early but less aggressive surgical treatment. Obstet. Gynecol. Int. J. 2020; 11(2): 122-5.
  19. Kitawaki J., Koga K., Kanzo T., Momoeda M. An assessment of the efficacy and safety of dydrogesterone in women with ovarian endometrioma: An open-label multicenter clinical study. Reprod. Med. Biol. 2021; 20(3): 345-51. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12391.
  20. Koninckx P.R., Ussia A., Adamian L., Alsuwaidi S., Amro B., Gharbi H. et al. Conservative surgery of deep bowel endometriosis. In: Ferrero S., Ceccaroni M., eds. Clinical management of bowel endometriosis. From diagnosis to treatment. Springer; 2020: 119-33.
  21. Koninckx P.R., Ussia A., Adamyan L., Tahlak M., Keckstein J., Wattiez A., Martin D.C. The epidemiology of endometriosis is poorly known as the pathophysiology and diagnosis are unclear. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2021; 71: 14-26. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.bpobgyn.2020.08.005.
  22. Vigano P., Candiani M., Monno A., Giacomini E., Vercellini P., Somigliana E. Time to redefine endometriosis including its profibrotic nature. Hum. Reprod. 2018; 33(3): 347-52. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex354.
  23. Casper R.F. Progestin-only pills may be a better first-line treatment for endometriosis than combined estrogen-progestin contraceptive pills. Fertil. Steril. 2017; 107(3): 533-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.01.003.
  24. Hurst B.S., Gardner S.C., Tucker K.E., Awoniyi C.A., Schlaff W.D. Delayed oral estradiol combined with leuprolide increases endometriosis-related pain. JSLS. 2000; 4(2): 97-101.
  25. Vercellini P., Sergenti G., Buggio L., Frattaruolo M.P., Dridi D., Berlanda N. Advances in the medical management of bowel endometriosis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2021; 71: 78-99. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.bpobgyn.2020.06.004
  26. Yarmolinskaya M.I., Adamyan L.V. Hormonal contraceptives and endometriosis: modern view on the problem. Russian Journal of Human Reproduction. 2020; 26(3): 39 45. (in Russian). https://dx.doi.org/10.17116/repro20202603139.
  27. Chapron C., Souza C., Borghese B., Lafay-Pillet M.-C., Santulli P., Bijaoui G., Goffinet F., de Ziegler D. Oral contraceptives and endometriosis: the past use of oral contraceptives for treating severe primary dysmenorrhea is associated with endometriosis, especially deep infiltrating endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 2011; 26(8): 2028-35. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ humrep/der156.
  28. Maignien C., Santulli P., Marcellin L., Korb D., Bordonne C., Dousset B. et al. Infertility in women with bowel endometriosis: first-line assisted reproductive technology results in satisfactory cumulative live birth rates. Fertil. Steril. 2021; 115(3): 692-701. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.032.
  29. Thomin A., Belghiti J., David C., Marty O., Bornes M., Ballester M. et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with colorectal endometriosis. BJOG. 2018; 125(6): 711-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ 1471-0528.14221.
  30. Vercellini P., Vigano P., Somigliana E. First-line in vitro fertilization or surgery for infertile women with bowel endometriosis? Fertil. Steril. 2021; 115(3): 593-4. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.01.005.
  31. Donnez J., Dolmans M.M. Endometriosis and medical therapy: from progestogens to progesterone resistance to GnRH antagonists: a review. J. Clin. Med. 2021; 10(5): 1085. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051085.
  32. Koninckx P.R., Ussia A., Adamyan L., Gomel V., Martin D.C. Peritoneal fluid progesterone and progesterone resistance in superficial endometriosis lesions. Hum. Reprod. 2021; 37(2):203-11. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab258.
  33. Koninckx P.R., Ussia A., Adamyan L., Wattiez A., Gomel V., Martin D.C. Heterogeneity of endometriosis lesions requires individualization of diagnosis and treatment and a different approach to research and evidence-based medicine. Facts Views Vis. Obgyn. 2019; 11(1): 57-61.
  34. Donnez J. The heterogeneity of endometriotic lesions could be explained by their progesterone resistance. Hum. Reprod. 2021; 36(9): 2624-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab151.
  35. Bulun S.E., Yilmaz B.D., Sison C., Miyazaki K., Bernardi L., Liu S. et al. Endometriosis. Endocr. Rev. 2019; 40(4):1048-79. https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/er.2018-00242.
  36. de Almeida Asencio F., Ribeiro H.A., Ribeiro P.A., Malzoni M., Adamyan L., Ussia A. et al. Symptomatic endometriosis developing several years after menopause in the absence of increased circulating estrogen concentrations: a systematic review and seven case reports. Gynecol. Surg. 2019; 16(3). https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10397-019-1056-x.
  37. Grandi G., Barra F., Ferrero S., Sileo F.G., Bertucci E., Napolitano A. et al. Hormonal contraception in women with endometriosis: a systematic review. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care. 2019; 24(1): 61-70. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2018.1550576.
  38. Singh S., Best C., Dunn S., Leyland N., Wolfman W.L.; CLINICAL PRACTICE – GYNAECOLOGY COMMITTEE. Abnormal uterine bleeding in pre-menopausal women. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2013; 35(5): 473-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30939-7.
  39. Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin N 128: diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive-aged women. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012; 120(1): 197-206. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318262e320.
  40. Murji A., Biberoğlu K., Leng J., Mueller M.D., Römer T., Vignali M., Yarmolinskaya M. Use of dienogest in endometriosis: a narrative literature review and expert commentary. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2020; 36(5): 895-907. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2020.1744120.
  41. Sukhikh G.T., Adamyan L.V., Dubrovina S.O., Baranov I.I., Bezhenar V.F., Kozachenko A.V. et al. Prolonged cyclical and continuous regimens of dydrogesterone are effective for reducing chronic pelvic pain in women with endometriosis: results of the ORCHIDEA study. Fertil. Steril. 2021; 116(6): 1568-77. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.fertnstert.2021.07.1194.
  42. Kim S.A., Kim S.J., Um M.J. Effects of dienogest for dysmenorrhea associated with endometriosis. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2016; 32(Suppl. 1): 108.
  43. Diagnosi e trattamento dell’endometriosi. SIGO, AOGOI, AGUI. Rome, Italy: Italian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (SIGO); 2018.
  44. Schomacker M.L., Hansen K.E., Ramlau-Hansen C.H., Forman A. Is endometriosis associated with irritable bowel syndrome? A cross-sectional study. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2018; 231: 65-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.023.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2023 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies