Management of birth under ultrasound guidance in patients with the transversely contracted pelvis

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Relevance: Currently, different types of the contracted pelvis are mainly determined with the help of radiological diagnostic methods before pregnancy or in the antenatal period. Intranatally, biomechanism of childbirth characterizes the form of the pelvic contraction. In order to obtain objective manual data, a combined transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound assessment is proposed, as it an effective, safe and accurate method for monitoring the ratio of the fetal head and the birth canal.

Case report: The article presents a clinical case of a patient whose transperineal ultrasound scanning revealed that labor started with asynclitic insertion of the fetal head with a sagittal suture in the conjugate of the pelvic inlet. The occipital posterior presentation was diagnosed and the type of the transversely contracted pelvis was suspected. The progress of the fetal head in labor was evident due to an increase in the angle of progression from 106° to 125°, while the sagittal suture remained in the conjugate of the true pelvis. When the cervix was fully dilated and the angle of progression was 154°, the rotation of the head by 180° began in the plane of the pelvic outlet. The birth occurred with the anterior occipital cephalic presentation.

Conclusion: The patients with the transversely contracted pelvis may give birth spontaneously only if fetus takes the anterior occipital cephalic presentation. In case of initial posterior presentation, giving birth will occur naturally through the birth canal, only when the fetal head is rotated 180° and the fetus takes the anterior presentation. The high direct position of the fetal head is accompanied by signs of clinical inconsistency. The use of ultrasound criteria made it possible to establish a type of the contracted pelvis, which was confirmed by MRI, and it was also possible to provide evidence of the likelihood of the spontaneous birth.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Mark A. Kurtser

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: m.kurtser@mcclinics.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0175-1968

Dr.Med. Sci., Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of Savelyeva Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatric Faculty

Russian Federation, 111997, Moscow, Ostrovitianov str., 1

Irina Yu. Breslav

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: irina_breslav@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0245-4968

Dr.Med. Sci., Professor of Savelyeva Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatric Faculty

Russian Federation, 111997, Moscow, Ostrovitianov str., 1

Natalia Yu. Ivanova

Clinical Hospital MD GROUP

Email: ny.ivanova@mcclinics.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-9826-1287

Ultrasound Diagnostics Doctor, Ultrasound Diagnostics Department

Russian Federation, 117209, Moscow, Sevastopolsky Ave., 24/1

Yulia A. Maryasheva

Clinical Hospital MD GROUP

Email: maryasheva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-5062-5390

PhD, Radiologist, Radiology Department

Russian Federation, 117209, Moscow, Sevastopolsky Ave., 24/1

References

  1. Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации. Клинические рекомендации «Медицинская помощь матери при установленном или предполагаемом несоответствии размеров таза и плода. Лицевое, лобное или подбородочное предлежание плода, требующее предоставления медицинской помощи матери». 2023. [Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Clinical guidelines “Medical care for the mother in case of established or suspected discrepancy between the sizes of the pelvis and the fetus. Facial, frontal or chin presentation of the fetus, requiring medical care for the mother”. 2023. (in Russian)].
  2. Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации. Клинические рекомендации «Роды одноплодные, самопроизвольное родоразрешение в затылочном предлежании (нормальные роды)». 2021. [Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Clinical guidelines “Singleton birth, spontaneous delivery in occipital presentation (normal birth)”. 2021. (in Russian)].
  3. Чернуха Е.А., Волобуев А.И., Пучко Т.К. Анатомически и клинически узкий таз. Триада-Х; 2005. 256 с. [Chernukha E.A., Volobuev A.I., Puchko T.K. Anatomically and clinically narrow pelvis. Triad-X; 2005. 256 p. (in Russian)].
  4. Ghi T., Eggebø T., Lees C., Kalache K., Rozenberg P., Youssef A. et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2018; 52(1): 128-39. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.19072.
  5. Nouri-Khasheh-Heiran E., Montazeri A., Conversano F., Kashanian M., Rasuli M., Rahimi M. et al. The success of vaginal birth by use of trans-labial ultrasound plus vaginal examination and vaginal examination only in pregnant women with labor induction: a comparative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1): 3. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05324-4.
  6. Ghi T., Dall'Asta A. Sonographic evaluation of the fetal head position and attitude during labor. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2022: S0002-9378(22)00449-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.003.
  7. Dall'Asta A., Ramirez Zegarra R., Corno E., Mappa I., Lu J.L.A., Di Pasquo E. et al. Role of fetal head-circumference-to-maternal-height ratio in predicting Cesarean section for labor dystocia: prospective multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2023; 61(1): 93-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.24981.
  8. Malvasi A., Vinciguerra M., Lamanna B., Cascardi E., Damiani G.R., Muzzupapa G. et al. Asynclitism and its utrasonographic rediscovery in labor room to date: a systematic review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(12): 2998. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12122998.
  9. Birol Ilter P., Yassa M., Timur H., Dogan O., Tekin A.B., Haydar A. et al. Intrapartum ultrasound for fetal head asynclitism: Is it possible to establish a degree of asynclitism to correlate to delivery outcome? Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2023; 163(1): 271-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14814.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig.1.

Download (10KB)
3. Fig.2.

Download (11KB)
4. Fig.3.

Download (8KB)
5. Fig.4.

Download (15KB)

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies