Chromosomal abnormalities in nonimmune hydrops fetalis: diagnosis and management of pregnancy

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective: To study the role of chromosomal abnormalities and optimal methods for their genetic testing in patients diagnosed with nonimmune hydrops fetalis (NIHF).

Materials and methods: After perinatal consultation and genetic counselling, 43 pregnant women with NIHF were selected; they underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis at 15 to 30 weeks’ gestation. The quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) method was used in the first step of testing fetal material to detect abnormalities of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, Y. Molecular karyotyping using DNA microarrays was performed in the second step.

Results: The patients were divided into three groups according to the period of NIHF manifestation: group 1 included patients with manifestation of the disease up to 13+6 weeks, group 2 included patients with manifestation from 14 to 21+6 weeks, and group 3 included patients with manifestation from 22 weeks. Chromosomal abnormalities were found to be the most common cause of NIHF in group 1 (78.5%) and were associated with a higher risk of perinatal loss. Live births were noted only in 2 out of 14 cases with early manifestation of NIHF in patients with normal fetal karyotypes. A total of 11/43 (25.6%) patients had chromosomal abnormalities, including Turner syndrome (13.9%), Down syndrome (6.9%), Edwards syndrome (2.3%), and DiGeorge syndrome (2.3%). No chromosomal abnormalities were diagnosed in patients with manifestation of NIHF after 14 weeks, and it was associated with a higher live birth rate.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated the need for invasive prenatal diagnosis, the place and advantages of each of the methods for genetic testing performed prenatally in case of NIHF. The findings of genetic testing are relevant for counselling couples about the prognosis of current pregnancies and for assessing the risk of NIHF recurrence in subsequent pregnancies in a given family.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Daria G. Lyushnina

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Author for correspondence.
Email: d_lyushnina@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-3160-8737

PhD student

Russian Federation, Moscow

Nana K. Tetruashvili

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: tetrauly@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9201-2281

PhD, Нead of the Obstetric Department of Pregnancy Pathology No. 2

Russian Federation, Moscow

Jekaterina Shubina

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: e_shubina@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4383-7428

PhD (Bio), Head of Laboratory of Genomic Data Analysis

Russian Federation, Moscow

Margarita S. Rogacheva

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: m_rogacheva@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2495-2554

Researcher at the Laboratory of Genomic Data Analysis

Russian Federation, Moscow

Nadezhda V. Zaretskaya

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: znadezda@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6754-3833

PhD, Head of the Laboratory of Clinical Genetics of the Department of Clinical Genetics

Russian Federation, Moscow

Anna S. Bolshakova

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: a_bolshakova@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7508-0899

MD, geneticist at the Department of Clinical Genetics

Russian Federation, Moscow

Ilya Y. Barkov

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: i_barkov@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6297-2073

PhD, Head of the Laboratory of Prenatal DNA Screening

Russian Federation, Moscow

Igor O. Sadelov

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: i_sadelov@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5144-6307

MD, geneticist at the Laboratory of Genomic Data Analysis

Russian Federation, Moscow

Viktoriia S. Pak

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: v_pak@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0002-1444-9071

PhD student

Russian Federation, Moscow

Ekaterina L. Bokeriya

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: e_bokeriya@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8898-9612

PhD, Researcher at the Department of Pathology of Newborn and Prematurely-born Children No. 2

Russian Federation, Moscow

Dmitrii Y. Trofimov

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: d_trofimov@oparina4.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1569-8486

Dmitrii Yu. Trofimov, PhD (Bio), Head of the Department of Clinical Genetics

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Guo D., He S., Lin N., Dai Y., Li Y., Xu L. et al. Genetic disorders and pregnancy outcomes of non-immune hydrops fetalis in a tertiary referral center. BMC Med. Genomics. 2023; 16(1): 83. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-023-01505-y.
  2. Norton M.E., Chauhan S.P., Dashe J.S.; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Society for maternal-fetal medicine (SMFM) clinical guideline #7: nonimmune hydrops fetalis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 212(2): 127-39. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.018.
  3. Iskaros J., Jauniaux E., Rodeck C. Outcome of nonimmune hydrops fetalis diagnosed during the first half of pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 1997; 90(3): 321-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00290-1.
  4. Sparks T.N., Lianoglou B.R., Adami R.R., Pluym I.D., Holliman K., Duffy J. et al.; University of California Fetal-Maternal Consortium; University of California, San Francisco Center for Maternal-Fetal Precision Medicine. Exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis in nonimmune hydrops fetalis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020; 383(18):1746-56. https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/ NEJMoa2023643.
  5. Кадырбердиева Ф.З., Шмаков Р.Г., Бокерия Е.Л., Тетруашвили Н.К., Костюков К.В., Донников А.Е., Белоусов Д.М. Неиммунная водянка плода: основные причины. Акушерство и гинекология. 2019; 11: 186-91. [Kadyrberdieva F.Z., Shmakov R.G., Bokeriya E.L., Tetruashvili N.K., Kostyukov K.V., Donnikov A.E., Belousov D.M. Nonimmune hydrops fetalis: main causes. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2019; (11): 186-91. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2019.11.186-191.
  6. Cherian A.G., Kamath V., Srivastava V., Danda S., Sebastian T., Beck M.M. Spectrum of chromosomal abnormalities detected by conventional cytogenetic analysis following invasive prenatal testing of fetuses with abnormal ultrasound scans. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. India. 2022; 72(Suppl. 1): 209-16. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13224-022-01626-x.
  7. Beke A., Joó J.G., Csaba A., Lázár L., Bán Z., Papp C. et al. Incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in the presence of fetal subcutaneous oedema, such as nuchal oedema, cystic hygroma and non-immune hydrops. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 2009; 25(1): 83-92. https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/ 000201946.
  8. Laterre M., Bernard P., Vikkula M., Sznajer Y. Improved diagnosis in nonimmune hydrops fetalis using a standardized algorithm. Prenat. Diagn. 2018; 38(5): 337-43. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pd.5243.
  9. He S., Wang L., Pan P., Wei H., Meng D., Du J. et al. Etiology and perinatal outcome of nonimmune hydrops fetalis in Southern China. AJP Rep. 2017; 7(2): e111-e115. https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603890.
  10. Heinonen S., Ryynänen M., Kirkinen P. Etiology and outcome of second trimester non-immunologic fetal hydrops. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2000; 79(1): 15-8.
  11. Hutchison A.A., Drew J.H., Yu V.Y., Williams M.L., Fortune D.W., Beischer N.A. Nonimmunologic hydrops fetalis: a review of 61 cases. Obstet. Gynecol. 1982; 59(3): 347-52.
  12. Meng D., Li Q., Hu X., Wang L., Tan S., Su J. et al. Etiology and outcome of non-immune hydrops fetalis in Southern China: report of 1004 cases. Sci. Rep. 2019; 9(1): 10726. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47050-6.
  13. Derderian S.C., Jeanty C., Fleck S.R., Cheng L.S., Peyvandi S., Moon-Grady A.J. et al. The many faces of hydrops. J. Pediatr. Surg. 2015; 50(1): 50-4; discussion 54. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.10.027.
  14. Berger V.K., Sparks T.N., Jelin A.C., Derderian C., Jeanty C., Gosnell K. et al. Non-immune hydrops fetalis: do placentomegaly and polyhydramnios matter? J. Ultrasound Med. 2018; 37(5):1185-91. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ jum.14462.
  15. Gedikbasi A., Oztarhan K., Gunenc Z., Yildirim G., Arslan O., Yildirim D. et al. Preeclampsia due to fetal non-immune hydrops: mirror syndrome and review of literature. Hypertens. Pregnancy. 2011; 30(3): 322-30. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.3109/10641950903323244.
  16. Кадырбердиева Ф.З., Шмаков Р.Г., Бокерия Е.Л., Костюков К.В. Тетруашвили Н.К. Эффективность применения алгоритма обследования на антенатальном этапе при неиммунной водянке плода. Акушерство и гинекология. 2020; 7: 71-8. [Kadyrberdieva F.Z., Shmakov R.G., Bokeriya E.L., Kostyukov K.V., Tetruashvili N.K. The effectiveness of the antenatal examination algorithm for nonimmune hydrops fetalis. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020; (7): 71-8. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.7.71-78.
  17. Chainarong N., Muangpaisarn W., Suwanrath C. Etiology and outcome of non-immune hydrops fetalis in relation to gestational age at diagnosis and intrauterine treatment. J. Perinatol. 2021; 41(10): 2544-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-01202-7.
  18. Faucett W.A., Savage M. Chromosomal microarray testing. JAAPA. 2012; 25(1): 65-6. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01720610-201201000-00016.
  19. Sileo F.G., Kulkarni A., Branescu I., Homfray T., Dempsey E., Mansour S. et al. Non-immune fetal hydrops: etiology and outcome according to gestational age at diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2020; 56(3): 416-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.22019.
  20. Al-Kouatly H.B., Shivashankar K., Mossayebi M.H., Makhamreh M., Critchlow E., Gao Z. et al. Diagnostic yield from prenatal exome sequencing for non-immune hydrops fetalis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Genet. 2023; 103(5): 503-12. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cge.14309.
  21. Zhou X., Zhou J., Wei X., Yao R., Yang Y., Deng L. et al. Value of exome sequencing in diagnosis and management of recurrent non-immune hydrops fetalis: a retrospective analysis. Front. Genet. 2021; 12: 616392. https:// dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.616392.
  22. Люшнина Д.Г., Тетруашвили Н.К., Шубина Е., Зарецкая Н.В., Толмачева Е.Р., Свирепова К.А., Большакова А.С., Пак В.С., Бокерия Е.Л., Трофимов Д.Ю. Лизосомные болезни накопления как одна из причин неиммунной водянки плода. Акушерство и гинекология. 2023; 12: 78-86. [Lyushnina D.G., Tetruashvili N.K., Shubina E., Zaretskaya N.V., Tolmacheva E.R., Svirepova K.A., Bol'shakova A.S., Pak V.S., Bokeriya E.L., Trofimov D.Yu. Lysosomal storage diseases as a cause of non-immune hydrops fetalis. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2023; (12): 78-86. (in Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2023.221.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Diagnostic search for NIVP

Download (221KB)
3. Fig. 2. Pregnant women with NIVP

Download (245KB)

Copyright (c) 2024 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies