WAYS OF REDUCING OBSTETRIC LOSSES


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Materials and methods. Two hundred and twenty-eight cases that had nearly ended in death from severe obstetric complications in pregnant women, parturients, and puerperas and 74 maternal death cases were analyzed. A comprehensive analysis of maternal deaths, assessment of perinatal risk factors, study of a correlation of signs, and statistical data processing were made. Results. Analysis of the defects at the stages of medical care revealed substantial differences for the women who had and nearly died: in the former, the defects per patient were 1.5-fold greater than those in the latter (the errors in assessing risk factors were 0.922±0.017 and 0.733±0.12; the defects of diagnostic and therapeutic measures, 0.894±0.023 and 0.666±0.11; low specialist training level, 0.892±0.023 and 0.616±0.090; inadequate level of obstetric services, 0.844±0.035 and 0.583±0.096). In-depth clinical analysis of critical obstetric complications suggests the definition of nearly dead female cases and provides evidence that it is necessary to calculate the index similar to that of maternal mortality (per 100000 live births) in a specific region. Conclusion. Thorough clinical analysis of nearly dead cases is a weighty contribution to the further reduction of maternal mortality rates, which is borne out by the equitype defects of a therapeutic and diagnostic process, which lead to fatal outcome in cases of preventable maternal death and its high risk in nearly dead women. Better conditions for maintaining maternal health should be aimed at reducing the number of fatal outcomes and be achieved by decreasing that of nearly dead female cases with a prior obstetric catastrophe.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. P MILOVANOV

Research Institute of Human Morphology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences

Laboratory of Female Reproductive System Pathology Moscow

E. Yu LEBEDENKO

Rostov State Medical University

Email: lebedenko08@mail.ru
Obstetrics and Gynecology Department Three, Faculty for Faculty for Advanced Training and Occupational Retraining of Specialists Rostov-on-Don

A. F MIKHELSON

Rostov State Medical University

Obstetrics and Gynecology Department Three, Faculty for Faculty for Advanced Training and Occupational Retraining of Specialists Rostov-on-Don

References

  1. Анализ причин материнской смертности: Руководство для врачей / Под ред. А.П. Милованова. — М.: Медицина для всех, — 2008.
  2. Баччи А., Льюис Г., Балтаг В. Ведение конфиденциальных расследований по случаям материнской смертности и анализа случаев, близких к смерти в Европейском регионе ВОЗ // Пробл. репрод. здоровья. — 2007. — Т. 15, № 30. — С. 31—40.
  3. Боровиков В.П. Statistica. Искусство анализа данных на компьютере. — СПб.: Питер, 2003.
  4. Бурдули Г.М., Фролова О.Г. Причины и технология анализа репродуктивных потерь. — М.: Триада-Х, 2008.
  5. Каюмова А.В., Башмакова Н.В. Случаи «near miss» в акушерской практике как тактический резерв профилактики материнской смертности // Материалы IV съезда акушеров-гинекологов России. — М., 2008. — С. 112—113.
  6. Лебеденко Е.Ю. Мониторинг материнской и младенческой смертности в Ростовской области // Вопр. гин., акуш. и перинатолог. — 2007. — Т. 6, № 1. — С. 40.
  7. Лебеденко Е.Ю., Михельсон А.Ф., Курочка М.П. Возможности прогнозирования критических акушерских состояний(«near miss») //МатериалыВсероссийского конгресса «Амбулаторно-поликлиническая практика: проблемы и перспективы». — М., 2011. — С. 250—252.
  8. Реброва О.Ю. Статистический анализ медицинских данных. Применение пакета прикладных программ. — М.: Медиа Сфера, 2002.
  9. Филимончикова И.Д. Материнская смертность и роль управляемых факторов в ее снижении // Экономика здравоохр. — 2004. — № 1. — С. 20—23.
  10. Adisasmita A., Deviany P.E., Nandiaty F. et al. Obstetric near miss and deaths in public and private hospitals in Indonesia // BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. — 2008. — Vol. 8. — № 8. — P. 10.
  11. Baskett T.F., O’Connell C.M. Severe obstetric maternal morbidity: a 15-year population-based study // J. Obstet. Gynaecol. — 2005. — Vol. 25, № 1. — Р 7—9.
  12. Lynch C.M., Sheridan C., Breathnach F.M. et al. Near miss maternal morbidity // Ir. Med. J. — 2008. — Vol. 101, № 5. — Р 134—136.
  13. Report on the World Health Organization Working Group on the classification of maternal deaths and severe maternal morbidities. — Geneva: World Health Organization, 2009. — № 87. — Р 734.
  14. Sousa M.H., Cecatti J.G., Hardy E., Serruya S.J. Probabilistic record linkage: an application to severe maternal morbidity (near miss) and maternal mortality // Cad. Saude Publica. — 2008. — Vol. 24, № 3. — Р 653—662.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2012 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies