Hyponatremia - hyperhydration during hysteroscopy
- Authors: Bagdasaryan A.R.1, Sarkisov S.E.1
- 
							Affiliations: 
							- Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
 
- Issue: No 4 (2014)
- Pages: 46-50
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/247161
- ID: 247161
Cite item
Abstract
Objective. To determine the rate of excessive intravasation of the dielectric fluid hyponatremia-hyperhydration (HH) and to improve methods for its prevention in patients with intrauterine abnormalities (IA). Subject and methods. The rate of HH during hysteroresectoscopic interventions was studied in 550 patients with IA (submucous uterine myoma, endometrial polyps, intrauterine synechiae, and abnormal uterine bleedings). The results of operative hysteroscopies carried out at two gynecology units, S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital, in 2012 to 2013 were studied by the Innovation Department of Mini-Invasive Technologies, V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. The findings were processed using a package of Statistica programs for Windows 6.0 Stat-Soft. Results. No HH cases were observed during hysteroresectoscopic interventions made in 550 patients aged 18 to 80 years. The volume of the fluid spent in our investigation for hysteroresectoscopy averaged 4.0 to 8.0 liters. The intervention was stopped when intravasation needed more than 1500 ml. The main stage of the surgical intervention (from the insertion of a hysteroscope to the completion of resection) lasted 4 to 15 min. The duration of surgical treatment with resection technology was 30-35 minutes. Blood loss did not exceed 50 ml in any case.
			                Full Text
 
												
	                        About the authors
Armen Rubenovich Bagdasaryan
Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
														Email: armenikus@mail.ru
				                					                																			                								PhD, doctoral candidate				                								 						
Sergey Eduardovich Sarkisov
Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia
														Email: 734l497@mail.ru
				                					                																			                								MD, professor, head of the innovation Department of minimally invasive technologies				                								 						
References
- Gariepy A.M., Creinin M.D., Schwarz E.B., Smith K.J. Reliability of laparoscopic compared with hysteroscopic sterilization at 1 year: a decision analysis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011; 118(2, Pt 1): 273-9.
- Bettocchi S., Nappi L., Ceci O., Selvaggi L. Office hysteroscopy. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. North Am. 2004; 31(3): 641-54.
- Савельева Г.М., Бреусенко В.Г., Каппушева Л.М. Гистероскопия. Атлас и руководство. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2013. 248 с.
- Sharma M., Taylor A., di Spiezio Sardo A., Buck L., Mastrogamvrakis G., Kosmas I. et al. Outpatient hysteroscopy: traditional versus the “no-touch” technique. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2005; 112(7): 963-7
- Федоров И.В., Сигал Е.И., Бурмистров М.В. Осложнения эндоскопической хирургии, гинекологии и урологии: Руководство для врачей. М.: Триада-Х; 2012. 283 с.
- Propst A.M., Liberman R.F., Harlow B.L., Ginsburg E.S. Complications of hysteroscopic surgery: predicting patients at risk. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000; 96(4): 517-0.
- Rauramo I., Elo I., Istre O. Long-term treatment of menorrhagia with levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus endometrial resection. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004; 104(6): 1314-21.
- Lee M.-J., Davies J., Guinn D., Sullivan L., Atkinson M.W., Scott McGregor S. et al. Single versus weekly courses of antenatal corticosteroids in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004; 103(2): 274-81.
- Savage U.K., Masters S.J., Smid M.C., Hung Y.-Y., Jacobson G.F. Hysteroscopic sterilization in a large group practice: experience and effectiveness. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 114(6): 1227-31.
- Панкратов В.В., Ягудаева И.П., Давыдов А.И., Белоцерковцева Л.Д. Качество здоровья и отдаленные результаты гистерорезектоскопии у больных подслизистой миомой матки. Вопросы гинекологии, акушерства и перинатологии. 2012; 11(3): 5-10.
- Bradley W.H., Boente M.P., Brooker D., Argenta P.A., Downs L.S., Judson P.L., Carson L.F. Hysteroscopy and cytology in endometrial cancer. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004; 104(5, Pt 1): 1030-3.
- Bettocchi S., Nappi L., Ceci O., Selvaggi L. What does “diagnostic hysteroscopy” mean today? The role of the new techniques. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003; 15(4): 303-8.
- Agostini A., Bretelle F., Ronda I., Roger V., Cravello L., Blanc B. Risk of vasovagal syndrome during outpatient hysteroscopy. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc. 2004; 11(2): 245-7.
- Hefler L., Lemach A., Seebacher V., Polterauer S., Tempfer C., Reinthaller A. The intraoperative complication rate of nonobstetric dilation and curettage. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 113(6): 1268-71.
Supplementary files
 
				
			 
					 
						 
						 
						 
						 
									
 Open Access
		                                Open Access Access granted
						Access granted