Dynamics of clinical symptoms of fibrocystic breast disease in the course of the transdermal gel of micronized progesterone monotherapy: results of the Russian multicenter observational study BREAST


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective. To assess the dynamics offibrocystic mastopathy symptoms regression when applying monotherapy with transdermal gel of micronized progesterone continuously for 3 and 6 months under conditions of routine clinical practice. Materials and methods. The study included 1044female patients of 34.8 ± 0.2 years of age diagnosed with diffuse mastopathy with predominant glandular component and diffuse fibrocystic mastopathy with predominant cystic component. All the patients received therapy with transdermal gel of micronized progesterone (Progestogel product) for 3and 6 months. The data related to dynamics of the disease symptoms were evaluated: clinical examination of the lacteal gland was performed, ultrasound and mammography examinations were performed, with assessment according to Bi-RADS categories. Intensity of the pain sense modality was evaluated in dynamics using visual analog scale (VAS) of pain. Statistical analysis of the collected data was carried out using IBM SPSS 23 software. Results. In 3-6 months of the continuous use of Progestogel product, a significant reduction in the amount of the earlier revealed thickened tissue areas was observed during ultrasound examination, including the areas of 1-2 cm and those exceeding 2 cm (hyperplastic lobules, cysts). According to the analysis of the mammographic conclusions, in the course of the therapy the signs of the fat involution build-up were observed as reducing from 9.1% to 1.3%, the signs of focal fibrosis reduced from 12.9% to 5.3%; the proportion of the patients with diffuse fibrocystic mastopathy with predominant cystic component reduced by 22.4% (from 56.6% to 34.2%). Significant improvement of the disease course is as well demonstrated by the dynamics of the changes as per the assessment according to Bi-RADS categories (p < 0.05). The intensity of the pain in the mammary glands significantly reduced in the therapy dynamics; before treatment it was 62.22 ± 0.84 scores, in 3 months 27.33 ± 0.70 scores (p < 0.001), in 6 months 9.33 ± 0.46scores (p < 0.001). Conclusion. The data obtained show the improvement of the life quality and reduction in the pain syndrome intensity in patients with mastalgia/mastodynia.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Anna E. Protasova

Saint Petersburg State University; North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov; Almazov National Medical Scientific Center of the Ministry of Health the Russian Federation

Email: protasoval966@yandex.ru
Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Elena N. Andreyeva

National Scientific Endocrinological Center of the Ministry of Health the Russian Federation; Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry named after A.I.Evdokimov

Email: endogen@mail.ru
Professor, Head of the Institute of Reproductive Medicine

Nadezhda I. Rozhkova

Gertsen National Center of reproductive oncology of the Ministry of Health the Russian Federation

Email: nrozhkova20l3@yandex.ru
Professor, Head

Ekaterina N. Vandeyeva

Almazov National Medical Scientific Center of the Ministry of Health the Russian Federation

Email: katvanl983@mail.ru
Junior assistant of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

References

  1. Кулагина Н.В. Доброкачественные заболевания молочных желез. Учебное пособие. 2-е изд. М.: «Типография «Печатных дел мастер»; 2012. 64с.
  2. Коган И.Ю., Мясникова М.О., Мусина Е.В. Прогестерон в лечении мастопатии. Айламазян Э.К. ред. М.: «Типография «Печатных дел мастер»; 2012.
  3. Сметник В.П., Коновалова В.Н. Молочная железа как своеобразный" интракринный орган. Вестник репродуктивного здоровья. 2009; 1: 39-44.
  4. Jameson J.L., De Groot L.J., de Kretser D.M., Giudice L.C., Grossman A.B., Melmed S. et al., eds. Endocrinology: adult and pediatric. 7th ed. Philadelphia PA USA: Elsevier; 2016; vol. 2(Pt 12: Hormonal control of breast development).
  5. NCCN - Evidence-Based Cancer Guidelines. https://www.nccn.org/
  6. Onstad M., Stuckey A., Benign breast disorders. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2013; 40 (3): 459-473.
  7. Dyrstad S.W., Yan Y., Fowler A.M., Colditz G.A. Breast cancer risk associated with benign breast disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2015; 149(3): 569-75.
  8. Mansel RE, Webster DJ, Sweetland HM. Breast pain and nodularity. In: Benign disorders and diseases of the breast. Elsevier 2009; p. 107-39.
  9. Андреева Е.Н., Рожкова Н.И., Соколова Д.А., ред. Доброкачественные дисплазии молочных желез: патогенетический вектор лечения. Обзор исследовании! клинические рекомендации: Информационный бюллетень. М.: StatusPraesens; 2016.
  10. Высоцкая И.В., Летягин В.П., Черенков В.Г., Лактионов К.П., Бубликов И.Д. Клинические рекомендации РООМ по профилактике РМЖ, дифференциальной диагностике, лечению предопухолевых и доброкачественных заболевании" молочных желез. М.: Российское общество онкомаммологов; 2015.
  11. Меских Е.В., Рожкова Н.И. Применение прожестожеля при диффузных формах мастопатии. Опухоли женскои" репродуктивнои" системы. 2012; 1: 57-60.
  12. Каприн А.Д., Рожкова Н.И. Маммология. Национальное руководство, М., ГЭОТАР Медиа; 2016: 483.
  13. Fentiman I.S. The pathophysiology and therapy of benign breast disease. In: Fauser B.C. ed. Reproductive medicine: molecular, cellular and genetic fundamentals. Pathenon Publ.; 2003: 87-94.
  14. Brkic M., Vujovic S., Ivanisevic M.F., Ivovic M., Gajic M.T., Marina L. et al. The influence of progesterone gel therapy in the treatment of fibrocystic breast disease. Open J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 6(5): 334-41.
  15. Pasqualini J.R. Differential effects of progestins on breast tissue enzy- mes. Maturitas 2003; 46 (Suppl. l): S45-54.
  16. Winkler U.H., Schindler A.E., Brinkmann U.S., Ebert C., Oberhoff C. Cyclic progestin therapy for the management of mastopathy and mastodynia. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2001 Dec;15 Suppl 6:37-43.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2018 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies