The risk of pelvic organ prolapse in women after obstetric traumas


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Aim. Assessment of the risk of pelvic organ prolapse in women after obstetrical traumas. Materials and methods. This was a prospective observational study. It included the women aged 45-74 years. The study was conducted in the Antenatal Clinic of Maternity hospital No. 7 in Baku. Initially, a list of all female patients (17,814) aged 45-75 years, who were assigned to the Antenatal Clinics was prepared. The research sample included consistently every 25th woman from this list. The sample size (710 women) was determined taking into account the probable prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse in women and maximum permissible sampling error (3%). The sample population was divided into groups according to the degree of prolapse, the age, number of pregnancies and childbirths in medical history, body weight and body mass index, the employment, educational level and severity of comorbidity. The differences between the groups were assessed using x2 test. Statistical data processing was carried out using qualitative data analysis method. Results. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse was 59.9% among all assessed women, and it was low in the group of women without obstetric traumas in history (26.5%), and in women with obstetric traumas of different degrees it was 67.2-100%. Assessment of risk factors in women showed that only a small proportion of them did not have risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse (50/710; 7%). Most of women had 2 and 3 risk factors in history (32.5 and 27.0%, respectively). Conclusion. The prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse was 59.9% and varied ranging from 26.5% (in the absence of obstetric traumas) to 100% (with third- and fourth-degree perineal tears in medical history). Among the risk factors for genital prolapse (age, dysplasia of connective tissue, burdened family history and others), obstetric traumas prevail. A combination of risk factors and obstetric traumas increase the risk of pelvic organ prolapse.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Minara Shain Askerova

A. Aliev Azerbaijan State Institute of Advanced Medical Training

Email: mirmmms@mail.ru
the author of dissertation, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

References

  1. Barber M.D., Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2013; 24(11): 1783-90. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2169-9.
  2. Jokho A.H., Rizvi R.M., MacArthur C. Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse in women, associated factors and impact on quality of life in rural Pakistan: Population Based Study. BMC Women’s Health. 2020; 20(1): 82. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-020-00934-6.
  3. Yuk J.S., Lee J.H., Hur J.Y., Shin J.H. The prevalence and treatment pattern of clinically diagnosed pelvic organ prolapse: a Korean National Health Insurance Database-based cross-sectional study 2009-2015. Sc. Rep. 2018; 8(1): 1334. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19692-5.
  4. Аскерова М.Ш., Рзакулиева Л.М. Распространенность и факторы риска выпадения женских половых органов у жительниц г. Баку. Казанский медицинский журнал. 2018; 99(2): 187-94.
  5. Гвоздев М.Ю., Тупикина Н.В., Касян Г.Р., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Пролапс тазовых органов в клинической практике врача уролога. Методические рекомендации №3. М.; 2016.
  6. Барсуков А.Н., Пересади О.А., Куликов А.А. Пролапс тазовых органов у женщин: современное состояние проблемы. Медицинская панорама. 2011; 6: 21-8.
  7. Vergeldt T.F.M., Weemhoff M., Inthou T.J., Kluivers K. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence a systematic review. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2015; 26(11): 1359-73. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2695-8.
  8. Rogowski A., Bienkowski P., Tarwacki D., Dziech E., Samochowiec J., Jerzak M., Baranowski W. Association between metabolic syndrome and pelvic organ prolapsed severity. Int Urogynecol J. 2015; 26(4): 563-8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2468-9.
  9. Hagen S., Stark D., Dougall I. A survey of prolapse practice in UK women’s health physiotherapists: what has changed in the last decade? Int Urogynecol J. 2016; 27(4): 579-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-015-2864-9.
  10. Lyatoshinskaya P., Gumma D., Popov A., Koch M., Haymann M. Knowledge of pervic organ prolapse in patients and their information-seeking preferences: comparing Vienna and Moscow. Int. Urogynecol. J. 2016; 27(11): 1673-80. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3018-4.
  11. Смольнова Т.Ю., Адамян Л.В. Клинико-патогенетические аспекты опущения и выпадения внутренних половых органов при недифференцированных формах дисплазии соединительной ткани. Кубанский научный медицинский вестник. 2009; 6: 69-73.
  12. Гланц С. Медико-биологическая статистика. Пер. с англ. М.: Практика; 1998. 459 с.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2021 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies