FETAL GROWTH RETARDATION: DIAGNOSIS AND AN OPTIMAL DELIVERY METHOD
- Autores: PALADI G.1, ILIADI-TULBURE K.1, TABUIKA U.G.1
-
Afiliações:
- N. Testemitsanu Kishinev State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Republic of Moldova
- Edição: Nº 5 (2011)
- Páginas: 45-48
- Seção: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/246521
- ID: 246521
Citar
Texto integral
Acesso aberto
Acesso está concedido
Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes
Resumo
Objective. To evaluate the efficiency of current diagnostic methods and to choose a delivery mode in relation to the degree of intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR). Subjects and methods. Four hundred and ten cases of full-term pregnancy were retrospectively studied according to medical records including medical history data, the results of follow-ups, ultrasonography (USG), and Doppler study, and neonatal information. Three study groups (310 women) were identified according to the degree of IUGR. A comparison group comprised 50 women with constitutional hypotrophy and a fetal weight of less than 2800 g. A control group consisted of 50 women with a fetal weight of more than 2800 g. Each group was divided into subgroups depending on the mode of delivery: a vaginal delivery and a cesarean section. Results. Fetal hypotrophy was diagnosed by USG in 74.44% of cases. In IUGR, the expected fetal mass was below the 10th percentile in 187 (60.32%) cases; abdominal circumference in 51.61%; femur length in 50.32%; biparietal diameter in 48.0%, and head circumference in 41.61%. The progressive pathological process was found to be paralleled by increases in resistance and pulsatility indices, which occurred in 83.8% of cases of third-degree IUGR. In 168 (54.2%) cases of IUGR, Doppler abnormal indices could identify fetal distress, which necessitated an emergence cesarean section. The perinatal mortality rates during a vaginal delivery were 48.8% (8 deaths). No neonatal deaths were recorded after cesarean section. There were differences in morbidity rates among the babies born by vaginal delivery or cesarean section (86.7 and 44.7%, respectively (p<0.05). Conclusion. USG with dynamic Doppler study makes it possible to timely diagnose IUGR and the degree of fetal distress and to make a decision on the time and mode of delivery. Cesarean section is the most sparing mode of delivery.
Texto integral
Sobre autores
G. PALADI
N. Testemitsanu Kishinev State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Republic of Moldova
K. ILIADI-TULBURE
N. Testemitsanu Kishinev State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Republic of Moldova
U. TABUIKA
N. Testemitsanu Kishinev State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Republic of Moldova
Email: tabuca@yandex.ru
Bibliografia
- Демидов В.Н., Розенфельд Б.Е., Сигизбаева И.К. Значение одновременного использования автоматизированной кардиотокографии и ультразвуковой допплерометрии для оценки состояния плода во время беременности// SonoAce-Ultrasound. - 2001. — № 9. — С. 73—80.
- Миколайович Я. Затримка розвитку плода (Патогенез, прогнозування, профшактика i лжування): Автореф. дис..д-ра. мед. наук. — Ктв, 2002.
- Пчелинцев В.В., Сидоров А.В. Особенности состояния здоровья женщин, родоразрешившихся плодом с внутриутробной задержкой развития // Материалы V Рос. форума «Мать и дитя»: Тезисы докл. — М., 2003. — С. 179—180.
- Стрижаков А.Н. Внутриутробная задержка развития плода (СЗРП) //Материалы V Рос. форума «Мать и дитя»: Тезисы докл. — М., 2003. - С. 44—45
- Brodsky H. Current concepts in intrauterine growth restriction //Obstet. and Gynec. ACOG. - 2000. - Vol. 19, № 6. — P. 307.
- Carbillon L. Diagnostic du retard de croissance intra-uterine// J.Réalit. Gynécol. Obstét. — 2006. - Vol. 92. — P. 32—38.
- Carbonne В., Cynober E. Indications et résultats du Doppler cérébral foetal // J. Réalit. Gynéc.-Obstét. — 2006. - Vol. 107. — P. 11—14.
- Cuttini M., Cortinovis I., Bossi A. et al. Proportionality of small for gestational age babies as a predictor of neonatal mortality and morbidity// Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. - 2001. — Vol. 5. — P. 56—63.
- Daikoku N.H., Johnson J.W., GrafG. et al. patterns of intrauterine growth retardation// Obstet. and Gynecol. ACOG. — 2005. — Vol. 54, № 2. — P. 211.
- Divon M.Y., Hsu H.W. Maternal and fetal blood flow velocity waveforms in intrauterine growth retardation// Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. - 2002. — Vol. 35. — P. 156—171.
- Fraser A.M., Broken J.E., Ward R.H. Association of young maternal age with adverse reproductive outcomes //N. Engl. J. Med. - 1995. — Vol. 332. — P. 1113—1117.
- Lin C.C., Santolaya-Forgas J. Current concepts of fetal growth restriction: Causes, classification, and pathophysiology//Obstet. and Gynecol. ACOG. - 2000. - Vol. 19, № 6. — P. 310.
- Ott W.J., Doyle S. Ultrasonic diagnosis of altered fetal growth by use of a normal ultrasonic fetal weight curve// Obstet. and Gynecol. - 2002. — Vol. 78. — P. 582.
- Seeds J.W. Impaired fetal growth: ultrasonic evaluation and clinical management// Obstet. and Gynecol. ACOG. -2005. — Vol. 64, № 4. — P. 577.
- Uzan M. Examen Doppler en cas du retard de croissance intrauterine// J.Réalit. en Gynécol.-Obstét. - 2006. — Vol. 9. — P. 83—96.
Arquivos suplementares
