Indications and effectiveness of technique for immature oocyte-cumulus complexes retrieval from ovarian tissue followed by their in vitro maturation


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Objective: To develop tactics for preserving genetic material in patients with malignant ovarian neoplasms using the technique for immature oocyte retrieval from ovarian tissue, ovarian tissue oocyte in vitro maturation (OTO IVM) and cryopreservation; to identify the indications and limitations of OTO IVM. Materials and methods: Seventy-two patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer or borderline ovarian tumors were examined prior to surgical treatment. The patients were evaluated for clinical and anamnestic characteristics, reproductive function and ovarian reserve, and characteristics of the oncological process; risk factors that could influence OTO IVM outcome were determined as well. Each patient underwent retrieval of oocyte-cumulus complexes (OCC) from one or two ovaries, followed by their identification and in vitro maturation. Depending on the patient’s desire, the obtained oocytes were cryopreserved or fertilized with biological material of the partner. Results: The patients were divided into two groups depending on the outcome of the OTO IVM program. Group 1 consisted of 17 patients who had a successful outcome of the program, namely, at least five mature oocytes and/ or one or more embryos were preserved. Group 2 included 55 patients with an unsuccessful outcome. The main factors that could influence OTO IVM outcome were identified. Conclusion: It was possible to determine the criteria for the selection of patients for using the OTO IVM technique. The results of the study showed that the use of OTO IVM can provide a sufficient number of OCC in young patients in case of good indicators of ovarian reserve, no preliminary resection of the ovaries, and if sufficient amount of ovarian tissue not affected by tumor was sent to the laboratory of embryology. This technique continues to be experimental: in spite of successful retrieval of OCC and oocyte in vitro maturation, high-quality blastocysts are cultivated less frequently than in assisted reproductive technologies and this may affect negatively the result of the treatment, namely, establishing pregnancy in this cohort of patients

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Ekaterina Bunyaeva

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: e_bunyaeva@oparina4.ru
gynecologist, 1st Gynecology Department

Anastasia Kirillova

Skoltech

Email: stasia.kozyreva@gmail.com
PhD, Senior Researcher

Tatiana Nazarenko

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: t_nazarenko@oparina4.ru
Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Director of Institute of Reproductive Medicine

Lana Dzhanashvili

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: ldzanashvili@oparina4.ru
PhD, obstetrician-gynecologist at Scientific and Clinical Department of ART named after F. Paulsen

Karina Gadzhimagomedova

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: gadzhimagomedova@oparina4.ru
embryologist at Scientific and Clinical Department of ART named after F. Paulsen

Grigory Khabas

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: khabas@list.ru
PhD, Head of the Department of Innovative Oncology and Gynecology

Almina Biryukova

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: a_birukova@oparina4.ru
PhD, gynecologist at Scientific and Clinical Department of ART named after F. Paulsen

Alla Gavisova

Academician V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: a_gavisova@oparina4.ru
PhD, Acting Head of the 1st Gynecology Department

Bibliografia

  1. Santos M.L., Pais A.S., Almeida Santos T. Fertility preservation in ovarian cancer patients. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2021; 37(6): 483-9.https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2021.1872534.
  2. Ferlay J., Ervik M., Lam F., Colombet M., Mery L., Pineros M. et al. Global cancer observatory: cancer today. Lyon: IARC; 2020.
  3. Xu Y., Zhang M., Zhang J., Ng D.M., Chen X., Si Y. et al. Neoadjuvant chemiotherapy increases the 5-year overall survival of patients with resectable cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021; 60(3): 433-41. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2021.03.008.
  4. Alexander V.M., Martin C.E., Schelble A.P., Laufer A.B., Hardi A., McKenzie L.J. et al. Ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in women with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing random and conventional starts. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 2021; 50(8): 102080. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102080.
  5. Massarotti C., Kohlhepp F., Liperis G., Ammar O.F., Mincheva M.N., Ali Z.E. et al. #ESHREjc report: Is OTO-IVM the future fertility preservation alternative for urgent cancer patients? Hum. Reprod. 2021; 36(9): 2631-3. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab180.
  6. Chen C.N., Chang L.T., Chen C.H., Tam K.W. Fertility preservation for women with breast cancer before chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2022; 44(2): 357-69. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.08.003.
  7. Fatemi H.M., Kyrou D., Al-Azemi M., Stoop D., De Sutter P., Bourgain C., Devroey P. Ex-vivo oocyte retrieval for fertility preservation. Fertil. Steril. 2011; 95(5): 1787.e15-1787.e17. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.023.
  8. Moragon S., Di Liello R., Bermejo B., Hernando C., Olcina E., Chirivella I. et al. Fertility and breast cancer: A literature review of counseling, preservation options and outcomes. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2021; 166: 103461. https://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103461.
  9. Kappy M., Lieman H.J., Pollack S., Buyuk E. Fertility preservation for cancer patients: treatment gaps and considerations in patients' choices. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2021; 303(6): 1617-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-05985-0.
  10. Ковальская Е.В., Кириллова А.О., Буняева Е.С., Хабас Г.Н., Камалетдинов Н.С., Назаренко Т.А., Абубакиров А.Н. Эффективность дозревания ооцитов, полученных в ходе овариэктомии, у онкологических пациенток. Акушерство и гинекология. 2019; 9: 87-91. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2019.9.87-91.
  11. Kirillova A., Bunyaeva E., Van Ranst H., Khabas G., Farmakovskaya M., Kamaletdinov N., Nazarenko T., Abubakirov A., Sukhikh G., Smitz J.E.J. Improved maturation competence of ovarian tissue oocytes using a biphasic in vitro maturation system for patients with gynecological malignancy: a study on sibling oocytes. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2021; 38(6): 1331-40. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02118-z.
  12. Howlader N., Noone A.M., Krapcho M., Miller D., Brest A., Yu M. et al.; eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2018. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. Available at: https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2018/, based on November 2020 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2021.
  13. Назаренко Т.А., Ашрафян Л.А., Бирюкова А.М., Кириллова А.О., Мартиросян Я.О., Джанашвили Л.Г., Буняева Е.С. Характеристики и тактика ведения онкологических больных, нуждающихся в сохранении репродуктивного материала. Акушерство и гинекология. 2020; 11: 93-9. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.11.93-99.
  14. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R. Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria; 2020.
  15. Berjeb K.K., Debbabi L., Braham M., Zemni Z., Chtourou S., Hannachi H. et al. Evaluation of ovarian reserve before and after chemotherapy. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 2021; 50(5): 102035. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.102035.
  16. Romito A., Bove S., Romito I., Zace D., Raimondo I., Fragomeni S.M. et al. Ovarian reserve after chemotherapy in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Pers. Med. 2021; 11(8): 704. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080704.
  17. Hopeman M.M., Cameron K.E., Prewitt M., Barnhart K., Ginsberg J.P., Sammel M.D., Gracia C.R. A predictive model for chemotherapy-related diminished ovarian reserve in reproductive-age women. Fertil. Steril. 2021; 115(2): 431-7. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.003.
  18. Cakmak H., Rosen M.P. Random-start ovarian stimulation in patients with cancer. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015; 27(3): 215-21. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000180.
  19. Wang N., Zhao X., Ma M., Zhu Q., Wang Y. Effect of Day 3 and Day 5/6 embryo quality on the reproductive outcomes in the single vitrified embryo transfer cycles. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne). 2021; 12: 641623. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.641623.
  20. Anderson R.A., Amant F., Braat D., DAngelo A., de Sousa Lopes S.M.C., Demeestere I., Dwek S. et al.; ESHRE Guideline Group on Female Fertility Preservation. ESHRE guideline: female fertility preservation. Hum. Reprod. Open. 2020; 2020(4): hoaa052. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa052.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Bionika Media, 2022

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies