REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE DIAGNOSES OF ENDOMETRIAL HYPERPLASIA ACCORDING TO THE WHO CLASSIFICATION AND THE MODIFIED (BINARY) CLASSIFICATION
- 作者: KONDRIKOV N.I1, ASATUROVA A.V1, MOGIREVSKAYA O.A1, BARINOVA I.V2, ANDREYEV A.I3, NAZHIMOV V.P4
-
隶属关系:
- Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia
- Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ministry of Health of the Moscow Region
- Moscow Family Planning and Reproduction Center One
- Russian Children's Republican Hospital
- 期: 编号 3 (2011)
- 页面: 42-46
- 栏目: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/246497
- ID: 246497
如何引用文章
详细
全文:
作者简介
N. KONDRIKOV
Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia
A. ASATUROVA
Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia
O. MOGIREVSKAYA
Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia
I. BARINOVA
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ministry of Health of the Moscow Region
A. ANDREYEV
Moscow Family Planning and Reproduction Center One
V. NAZHIMOV
Russian Children's Republican Hospital
参考
- Бантыш Б.Б. Выявление информативных визуальных факторов по изображениям с гистологических препаратов при железистой гиперплазии эндометрия // Вестн. новых мед. технологий. — 2006. — T. 8, № 4. - C. 122.
- Кондриков Н.И. Патология матки. — М.: Практическая медицина, 2008.
- Чепик О.Ф. Морфогенез гиперпластических процессов // Практич. онкол. — 2005. — Т. 5, № 1. — С. 9—15.
- Allison K.H., Tenpenny E., Reed S.D. et al. Immunohistochemical markers in endometrial hyperplasia: is there a panel with promise? // Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. — 2008. — Vol. 16, № 4. — P. 329—343.
- Bergeron C., Nogales F., Masserali M., et al. A Multicentric European Study Testing the Reproducibility of the WHO Classification of Endometrial Hyperplasia With a Proposal of a Simplified Working Classification for Biopsy and Curettage Specimens // Am. J. Surg. Pathol. — 1999. — Vol. 23. — P. 1102—1108.
- Dietel M. The histological diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia Is there a need to simplify? // Virch. Arch. — 2001 — Vol.439. — P. 604—608.
- Horn L.-C. Schnurrbusch U., Bilek K. Risk of progression in complex and atypical endometrial hyperplasia: clinicopathologic analysis in cases with and without progesterone treatment // Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. — 2004. — Vol. 14. — Р. 348—353.
- Kendall B.S., Ronnet B.M., Isacsons C. et al. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, and well-differentiated carcinoma // Am. J. Surg. Pathol. — 1998. — Vol. 22. — P. 1012—1019.
- Kurman R.S., Kaminski P.F., Norris H.S. The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia. A long-term study of „untreated” hyperplasia in 170 patients // Cancer. — 1985. — Vol. 56. — P. 403—412.
- Ørbo A., Moe B.T., Arnes M. et al. Prognostic Markers for Detection of Coexistent Carcinoma in High-risk Endometrial Hyperplasia. // Anticancer Res. — 2010. — Vol. 30, № 11. — P. 4649—4655.
- Lawrence I-Kuei Lin. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility // Biometrics. — 1989. — Vol. 45. — P. 255—268.
- Mutter, G.L. Histopathology of genetically defined endometrial precancers // Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. — 2000. — Vol. 19. — P. 301—309.
- Mutter G.L., Baak J.P., Crum C.P. Endometrial precancer diagnosis by histopathology, clonal analysis, and computerized morphometry // J. Pathol. — 2000. — Vol. 190. — P. 462— 469.
- Mutter G.L., Zaino R.J., Baak J.P. Benign endometrial hyperplasia sequence and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia // Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. — 2007. — Vol. 26, № 2. — P. 103—114.
- Narges I.-M., Yarmohammadi M., Ahmadi S.A. Reproducibility determination of WHO classification of endometrial hyperplasia/well differentiated adenocarcinoma and comparison with computerized morphometric data in curettage specimens in Iran // Diagn. Path. — 2009. — Vol. 4. — P. 4—10.
- Prat J. Histologic diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia. // Virch. Arch. — 2002. — Vol. 441, № 3. — P. 306—307.
- Reed S.D., Newton K.N., Clinton W.L. et. al. Incidence of endometrial hyperplasia // Am. J. Obst. Gynecol. — 2009. — Vol. 200, № 6. — P. 678e1—678e6.
- Scully R.E., Bonfiglio T.A., Kurman R.J. et al. // WHO. Histological typing of female genital truct tumors. — 2 rd ed. — Berlin: Heidelberg, 1994.
- Sherman M.E., Ronnett B.M., Ioffe O.B. Reproducibility of biopsy diagnoses of endometrial hyperplasia: evidence supporting a simplified classification // Int. J. Gynecol Pathol. — 2008. — Vol. 27. — P. 318—325.
- Silverberg S.G. Problems in the differential diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma // Mod. Pathol. — 2000. — Vol. 13. — P. 309—327.
- Skov B.G., Broholm. H., Engel U. et al. Comparison of the reproducibility of the WHO classifications of 1975 and 1994 of endometrial hyperplasia // Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. — 1997. — Vol. 16. — P. 33—37.
- Suh K.-S., Insun K., Moon Hyang P. A multiinstitutional consensus study on the pathologic diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma // Korean J. Pathol. — 2008. — Vol. 42. — P. 87—93.
- Takreem A., Nargis D., Sadia R. Incidence of endometrial hyperplasia in 100 cases presenting with polymenorrhagia/ menorrhagia in perimenupausal women // J. Ayub. Med. Coll. Abbottabad. — 2009. — Vol. 21, № 2. — P. 60—63.
- Terakawa N., Kigawa J., Taketani Y. The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia Study Group // J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. — 1997. — Vol.23, № 3. — P. 223—230.
- Zaino R. J., Kanderer J., Trimble C.L. et al. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a gynecologic oncology group study // Cancer. — 2006. — Vol. 106. — P. 804—811.