REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE DIAGNOSES OF ENDOMETRIAL HYPERPLASIA ACCORDING TO THE WHO CLASSIFICATION AND THE MODIFIED (BINARY) CLASSIFICATION
- Authors: KONDRIKOV N.I1, ASATUROVA A.V1, MOGIREVSKAYA O.A1, BARINOVA I.V2, ANDREYEV A.I3, NAZHIMOV V.P4
-
Affiliations:
- Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia
- Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ministry of Health of the Moscow Region
- Moscow Family Planning and Reproduction Center One
- Russian Children's Republican Hospital
- Issue: No 3 (2011)
- Pages: 42-46
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0300-9092/article/view/246497
- ID: 246497
Cite item
Abstract
Full Text
About the authors
N. I KONDRIKOV
Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia
A. V ASATUROVA
Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia
O. A MOGIREVSKAYA
Academician V.I. Kulakov Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia
I. V BARINOVA
Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ministry of Health of the Moscow Region
A. I ANDREYEV
Moscow Family Planning and Reproduction Center One
V. P NAZHIMOV
Russian Children's Republican Hospital
References
- Бантыш Б.Б. Выявление информативных визуальных факторов по изображениям с гистологических препаратов при железистой гиперплазии эндометрия // Вестн. новых мед. технологий. — 2006. — T. 8, № 4. - C. 122.
- Кондриков Н.И. Патология матки. — М.: Практическая медицина, 2008.
- Чепик О.Ф. Морфогенез гиперпластических процессов // Практич. онкол. — 2005. — Т. 5, № 1. — С. 9—15.
- Allison K.H., Tenpenny E., Reed S.D. et al. Immunohistochemical markers in endometrial hyperplasia: is there a panel with promise? // Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. — 2008. — Vol. 16, № 4. — P. 329—343.
- Bergeron C., Nogales F., Masserali M., et al. A Multicentric European Study Testing the Reproducibility of the WHO Classification of Endometrial Hyperplasia With a Proposal of a Simplified Working Classification for Biopsy and Curettage Specimens // Am. J. Surg. Pathol. — 1999. — Vol. 23. — P. 1102—1108.
- Dietel M. The histological diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia Is there a need to simplify? // Virch. Arch. — 2001 — Vol.439. — P. 604—608.
- Horn L.-C. Schnurrbusch U., Bilek K. Risk of progression in complex and atypical endometrial hyperplasia: clinicopathologic analysis in cases with and without progesterone treatment // Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. — 2004. — Vol. 14. — Р. 348—353.
- Kendall B.S., Ronnet B.M., Isacsons C. et al. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, and well-differentiated carcinoma // Am. J. Surg. Pathol. — 1998. — Vol. 22. — P. 1012—1019.
- Kurman R.S., Kaminski P.F., Norris H.S. The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia. A long-term study of „untreated” hyperplasia in 170 patients // Cancer. — 1985. — Vol. 56. — P. 403—412.
- Ørbo A., Moe B.T., Arnes M. et al. Prognostic Markers for Detection of Coexistent Carcinoma in High-risk Endometrial Hyperplasia. // Anticancer Res. — 2010. — Vol. 30, № 11. — P. 4649—4655.
- Lawrence I-Kuei Lin. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility // Biometrics. — 1989. — Vol. 45. — P. 255—268.
- Mutter, G.L. Histopathology of genetically defined endometrial precancers // Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. — 2000. — Vol. 19. — P. 301—309.
- Mutter G.L., Baak J.P., Crum C.P. Endometrial precancer diagnosis by histopathology, clonal analysis, and computerized morphometry // J. Pathol. — 2000. — Vol. 190. — P. 462— 469.
- Mutter G.L., Zaino R.J., Baak J.P. Benign endometrial hyperplasia sequence and endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia // Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. — 2007. — Vol. 26, № 2. — P. 103—114.
- Narges I.-M., Yarmohammadi M., Ahmadi S.A. Reproducibility determination of WHO classification of endometrial hyperplasia/well differentiated adenocarcinoma and comparison with computerized morphometric data in curettage specimens in Iran // Diagn. Path. — 2009. — Vol. 4. — P. 4—10.
- Prat J. Histologic diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia. // Virch. Arch. — 2002. — Vol. 441, № 3. — P. 306—307.
- Reed S.D., Newton K.N., Clinton W.L. et. al. Incidence of endometrial hyperplasia // Am. J. Obst. Gynecol. — 2009. — Vol. 200, № 6. — P. 678e1—678e6.
- Scully R.E., Bonfiglio T.A., Kurman R.J. et al. // WHO. Histological typing of female genital truct tumors. — 2 rd ed. — Berlin: Heidelberg, 1994.
- Sherman M.E., Ronnett B.M., Ioffe O.B. Reproducibility of biopsy diagnoses of endometrial hyperplasia: evidence supporting a simplified classification // Int. J. Gynecol Pathol. — 2008. — Vol. 27. — P. 318—325.
- Silverberg S.G. Problems in the differential diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma // Mod. Pathol. — 2000. — Vol. 13. — P. 309—327.
- Skov B.G., Broholm. H., Engel U. et al. Comparison of the reproducibility of the WHO classifications of 1975 and 1994 of endometrial hyperplasia // Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. — 1997. — Vol. 16. — P. 33—37.
- Suh K.-S., Insun K., Moon Hyang P. A multiinstitutional consensus study on the pathologic diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma // Korean J. Pathol. — 2008. — Vol. 42. — P. 87—93.
- Takreem A., Nargis D., Sadia R. Incidence of endometrial hyperplasia in 100 cases presenting with polymenorrhagia/ menorrhagia in perimenupausal women // J. Ayub. Med. Coll. Abbottabad. — 2009. — Vol. 21, № 2. — P. 60—63.
- Terakawa N., Kigawa J., Taketani Y. The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia Study Group // J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. — 1997. — Vol.23, № 3. — P. 223—230.
- Zaino R. J., Kanderer J., Trimble C.L. et al. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a gynecologic oncology group study // Cancer. — 2006. — Vol. 106. — P. 804—811.