The “Zeitenwende” in German defence policy: major steps, limits and risks

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The “Zeitenwende” (times-turn) declared by chancellor Olaf Scholz in February 2022 presents a major shift in the German defence policy in recent decades. Berlin is now pursuing an ambitious aim of becoming a military leader in Europe after years of neglecting and defunding its army. The change in Germany’s military doctrine based on its newly published National Security Strategy and Defence Policy Guidelines are analyzed along with the current restructuring of the Bundeswehr and the procurement activities under the 100 bln euro special fund. The research shows that, although large, the provided investment is unlikely to eliminate deep-rooted deficits of the German army, especially when it comes to lacking equipment, infrastructure, munitions and personnel. While Germany’s new core concept of “integrated security” implies militarization of its foreign and security policies, the continuity of the “Zeitenwende” is far from being guaranteed in the years to come. The author underscores that mounting economic problems, institutional limits and Germany’s special strategic culture of restraint can massively hinder the military build-up. Another point is that a strong anti-Russian stance embedded in its new defence posture makes Berlin less flexible in terms of strategic autonomy. Reviving its Cold War role model of a “frontline state” Germany makes it even more difficult to find some common ground on a future security architecture in Europe. Some of its steps like equipping its nuclear-capable air component with F-35As, deploying and developing midrange missiles or consolidating a multinational ground-based air defence (European Sky Shield Initiative) could further destabilize European security.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Alexander Pavlov

Center for International Security, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO)

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: alexander.e.pavloff@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-6549-7111

Junior Research Fellow, Center for International Security

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Белозёров В.К. (2023) Германия конструирует стратегическую культуру // Россия в глобальной политике. Т. 21. № 5. С. 166–177. Belozerov V.K. (2023) Germany Constructs Strategic Culture. Rossiya v global’noi politike. vol. 21. no. 5. pp. 166–177. https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6439-2023-21-5-166-177 (In Russ.)
  2. Евтодьева М.Г. (2023) Западная военная помощь и передачи вооружений Украине в 2022 – начале 2023 г.: ключевые тенденции // Пути к миру и безопасности, № 1 (64), С. 11–30. Yevtodyeva M.G. (2023) Western Military Assistance and Arms Transfers to Ukraine in 2022 – early 2023: Key Trends. Puti k miru i bezopasnosti, no. 1 (64), pp. 11–30. https://doi.org/10.20542/2307-1494-2023-1-11-30 (In Russ.)
  3. Загорский А.В., Ознобищев С.К., Богданов К.В. (2023) Новый раскол Европы: военно-политические аспекты // В: Международная безопасность: новый миропорядок и технологическая революция (2023) / Отв. ред. А.Г. Арбатов и др. М.: ИМЭМО РАН. С. 229–246. Zagorski A.V., Oznobishchev S.K., Bogdanov K.V. (2023) New Divide in Europe: military-political aspects. In: Mezhdunarodnaya bezopasnost’: novyi miroporyadok i tekhnologicheskaya revolyutsiya (2023) / Ed (s). A.G. Arbatov et al. M.: IMEMO, pp. 229–246. (In Russ.)
  4. Ломакин А.С. (2023) Всеобъемлющая концепция модернизации бундесвера (Перспективы реализации «Профиля возможностей») // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. № 5 (67). С. 69–79. Lomakin A.A. (2023) Comprehensive Concept for Modernization of the Bundeswehr (Perspectives on the «Capability Profile» Implementation). Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, no. 5 (67), pp. 69–79. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-5-69-79 (In Russ.)
  5. Трунов Ф.О. (2021) К вопросу схемы структурных реформ современных вооруженных сил: пример ФРГ // Политическая наука. № 2. С. 187–206. Trunov F.O. (2021) On the Issue of the Modern Armed Forces Structural Reforms Scheme: The Example of FRG. Politicheskaya nauka, no. 2, pp. 187–206. https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2021.02.07 (In Russ.)
  6. Трунов Ф.О. (2024) Особенности сотрудничества Германии и Литвы в конце 2010-х – начале 2020-х годов: военные и политические аспекты // Балтийский регион. Т. 16. № 1. С. 61–80. Trunov, Ph.O. (2024) Military and political cooperation between Germany and Lithuania in the late 2010s to early 2020s. Baltic region, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 61–80. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2024-1-4
  7. Burilkov A., Rieck C. (2023) Vorbereitet auf die Zeitenwende?: Die Einsatzbereitschaft der Bundeswehr offenbart große Defizite // Sirius, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/sirius-2023-1001
  8. Burry B. et al. (2023) The Future of NATO´s European Land Forces: Plans, Challenges, Prospects // The International Institute for Strategic Studies. 42 p. https://www.iiss.org/research-paper/2023/06/the-future-of-natos-european-land-forces/
  9. Сoticchia F., Dian M., Moro F. (2023) Reluctant Remilitarisation: The Transformation of Defence Policy and Armed Forces in Germany, Italy and Japan. Edinburgh. Edinburgh University Press. 272 p.
  10. Fix L. (2024) The End of Civilian Power // In: Atomic Zeitenwende? Kühn U. (ed.). Routledge, 1st ed. Pp. 38–57.
  11. Helferich J. (2023) The (false) promise of Germany’s Zeitenwende // European View, vol. 22 (1), pp. 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/17816858231157556
  12. Nelson Amy J. (2024) Technological Change, Innovation, and German National Security // In: Atomic Zeitenwende? Kühn U. (ed.). Routledge, 1st ed. Pp. 58–83.
  13. Matlé A. (2024) Deutschlands Zeitenwende in der Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik: The good, the bad, and the ambiguous // Zeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik. 2024, vol. 17, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12399-023-00975-3
  14. Mello P.A. (2024) Zeitenwende: German Foreign Policy Change in the Wake of Russia’s War Against Ukraine // Politics and Governance, vol. 12. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7346
  15. Möhring J. (2023) Troubled Twins: The FCAS and MGCS Weapon Systems and Franco-German Co-operation // Etudes d’Ifri. 52 p. https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/ifri_mohring_fcas_mgcs_weapon_systems_2023.pdf
  16. Mölling C. Hellmonds S. (2023) Security, Industry, and the Lost European Vision // Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik. https://dgap.org/system/files/article_pdfs/DGAP%20Report%20No-10_November-2023_62pp_0.pdf
  17. Mölling C., Schütz T., Hellmonds S. (2023) Zeitschleife statt Zeitenwende: Die Bundeswehr bleibt in der strukturellen Unterfinanzierung // Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/87679/ssoar-2023-molling_et_al-Zeitschleife_statt_Zeitenwende_Die_Bundeswehr.pdf
  18. Moser С. (2022) Die Zeitenwende: viel Zeit, wenig Wende? // Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, vol. 82, Ss. 741–755. https://doi.org/10.17104/0044-2348-2022-4-741
  19. Röhl K-H., Bardt H., Engels B. (2023) // A new era for the defense industry? Security policy and defense capability after the Russian invasion of Ukraine. IW-Policy Paper, no. 1/2023, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW), Köln. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/270725/1/1839958197.pdf

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
2. Figure 1. FRG Military Expenditure (in current prices)

下载 (96KB)

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024