The main features of lithium metallogeny in geological time

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

This paper reports on lithium metallogeny in geological time. The geochronological analysis was conducted on the basis of data on 71 lithium deposits distributed globally. These deposits contain almost all Li resources, which are industrially significant and of potential interest in terms of the economy. It was established that these deposits were formed in different geological epochs, from the Late Mesoarchean to the Holocene. The distribution of their resources on the scale of geological time is distinctly discrete. In the Kenoran, Columbian, and Rodinian supercontinent cycles, only pegmatite deposits of lithium were formed. In the Pangean cycle, the main resources are also attributed to pegmatite deposits, but some of them are concentrated in lithium–fluorine rare-metal granites. In the incomplete Amasian cycle, salars of geodynamically active areas play a main role in the resource base; the epithermal stratiform deposits, pegmatites, and lithium fluorine-granites are of much less significance.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

А. V. Tkachev

Vernadsky State Geological Museum of Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: a.tkachev@sgm.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

D. V. Rundqvist

Vernadsky State Geological Museum of Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: avtkachev@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

N. A. Vishnevskaya

Vernadsky State Geological Museum of Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: avtkachev@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Christmann P., Gloaguen E., Labbé J.-F., et al. Chapter 1 — Global Lithium Resources and Sustainabi­lity Issues. In: Lithium Process Chemistry: Resources, Extraction, Batteries and Recycling. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015. P. 1–40.
  2. Линде Т. П., Ставров О. Д., Юшко Н. А. и др. ­Литий России: состояние, перспективы освоения и развития ми-нерально-сырьевой базы // Минерал. сырьё. Сер. геол.-экон. 2000. № 6. 116 с.
  3. Evans K. R. Chapter 10 — Lithium. Critical Metals Handbook. Hoboken (N. J.): Wiley/Blackwell, 2014. P. 230–260.
  4. Kesler S. E., Gruber P. W., Medina P. A., et al. // Ore Geol. Rev. 2012. V. 48. P. 55–69.
  5. Li J., Zou T., Liu X., et al. // Acta Geol. Sin. 2015. V. 89. P. 652–670.
  6. McCauley A., Bradley D. C. // Canad. Mineral. 2014. V. 52. P. 183–190.
  7. Ткачев А. В., Булов С. В., Рундквист Д. В. и др. // Гео- информатика. 2015. № 1. C. 47–59.
  8. Ткачев А. В., Рундквист Д. В. // Геология руд. месторождений. 2016. Т. 58. № 4. С. 295–318.
  9. Harris P. D., Robb L. J., Tomkinson M. J. // South Afr. J. Geol. 1995. V. 98. № 1. P. 82–94.
  10. Trumbull R. B. // Precambr. Res. 1993. V. 61. P. 89–116.
  11. Tkachev A. V. Evolution of Metallogeny of Granitic Pegmatites Associated with Orogens Throughout Geological Time. // Geol. Soc. London. Spec. Publ. 2011. V. 350. P. 7–23.
  12. Duarte J. C., Schellart W. P., Rosas F. M. // Geol. Mag. 2018. V. 155. № 1. P. 45–58.
  13. Ткачев А. В., Романюк Т. В. // Бюл. МОИП. Отд. геол. 2010. Т. 85. В. 1. С. 27–47.
  14. Rogers J. J. W., Santosh M. Continents and Super­continents. Oxford: OxfordUniv. Press, 2004. 304 p.
  15. Bradley D. C. // Earth-Sci. Rev. 2008. V. 91. P. 1–26.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. The distribution of resources KSKM Li on the axis of geological time. The numbers under the names of supercontinental cycles are the percentages of these cycles in the integral resources of the objects in the analyzed sample: in the numerator - from the resources of all objects, in the denominator - without taking into account the lithium-bearing brines in salars. For KSKM types: 1 — pegmatites, 2 — Li-fluoride rare-metal granites, 3 — epithermal stratiform deposits, 4 — salars.

Download (229KB)

Copyright (c) 2019 Russian Academy of Sciences