Bone autograft collapse. Clinical case of the complication and clinical case of the solutions to this problem



如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Introduction: The choise of the surgical treatmentof full-layered bone defects of the talar dome is a topical ussie. Mosaicplasty of the talar dome is the «gold standart» in the treatment of patients with full-layered defects of the talus, but this technique also have disadvantages the formation of subxhondral cyst, bone graft collapse.

Clinical cases description: Two clinical cases are presented to your attention, in 1 clinical case performed bone mosaicplasty of the talar dome. After 6 month complication — collapse of the bone autograft, accompanied by pain syndrome. After 6 month ankle fusion was performed. After 6 month pain syndrome was reliefe VAS score decreased from 7 to 3/10 points. AOFAS improved to 74/100 points, FAAM to 70/84 points. In 2 clinical case we taken modified mosacplasty with AMIC (Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis) technology, with k-wire provisor bone graft fixation. In the 2 clinical case after 6 month after operation, according to CT: bone grafts osteointegration without sybchondral cyst formation. Good clinical result: VAS decreased from 7/10 to 1/10, AOFAS improved from 70/100 to 90/100 and FAAM improved 72/84 to 83/84 points.

Conclusion: The peading criteries of a good result of chondroplasty of the talar dome is stability of the bone autograft. Stability was achieved by sufficient graft length and stable fixation. The proposed method of k-wire provisor fixation bone graft, in our opinion this method. That allows maintaining the stability of the bone autograft, press-fit contact autograft talus bone.

全文:

в файле

×

作者简介

Виталий Чеботарев

Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: chebotarew.vitaly@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-6483-3162
俄罗斯联邦

参考

  1. Hurley ET, Murawski CD, Paul J, et al.; International Consensus Group on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Osteochondral Autograft: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(1_suppl):28S–34S. doi: 10.1177/1071100718781098
  2. de l’Escalopier N, Barbier O, Mainard D, et al. Outcomes of talar dome osteochondral defect repair using osteocartilaginous autografts: 37 cases of Mosaicplasty®. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(1):97–102. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.11.006
  3. Guney A, Yurdakul E, Karaman I, et al. Medium-term outcomes of mosaicplasty versus arthroscopic microfracture with or without platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(4):1293–1298. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3834-y
  4. Savage-Elliott I, Smyth NA, Deyer TW, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evidence of Postoperative Cyst Formation Does Not Appear to Affect Clinical Outcomes After Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation of the Talus. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(9):1846–54. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.04.018
  5. Wan DD, Huang H, Hu MZ, Dong QY. Results of the osteochondral autologous transplantation for treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus with harvesting from the ipsilateral talar articular facets. Int Orthop. 2022;46(7):1547–1555. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05380-7
  6. Feeney KM. The Effectiveness of Osteochondral Autograft Transfer in the Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2022 Nov;14(11):e31337. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31337
  7. Shimozono Y, Hurley ET, Myerson CL, Kennedy JG. Good clinical and functional outcomes at mid-term following autologous osteochondral transplantation for osteochondral lesions of the talus. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(10):3055–3062. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4917-3
  8. Kreuz PC, Steinwachs M, Erggelet C, et al. Mosaicplasty with Autogenous Talar Autograft for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus after Failed Primary Arthroscopic Management. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2006;34(1):55–63. doi: 10.1177/0363546505278299
  9. Latt LD, Glisson RR, Montijo HE, Usuelli FG, Easley ME. Effect of graft height mismatch on contact pressures with osteochondral grafting of the talus. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(12):2662–2669. doi: 10.1177/0363546511422987
  10. Muradyan DR, Kesyan GA, Levin AN, et al. Surgical Treatment of Talus Osteochondral Lesions with Platelet-Rich Plasma. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 2013;20(3):46–50. doi: 10.17816/vto201320346-50
  11. Rodionova SS, Lekishvili MV, Sklyanchuk ED, et al. Prospects for Local Application of Antiresorptive Drugs in Skeleton Bone Injuries and Diseases. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 2014;21(4):83–89. doi: 10.17816/vto20140483-89
  12. Mittwede PN, Murawski CD, Ackermann J, et al.; International Consensus Group on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Revision and Salvage Management: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(1_suppl):54S–60S. doi: 10.1177/1071100718781863

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Eco-Vector,



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-76249 от 19.07.2019.


##common.cookie##