Formation of a modern historiographical model of political and legal knowledge

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article deals with the problem of forming a modern historiographical model of political and legal knowledge. First of all, it covers the issues of the science of the history of political and legal thought, the history of law and the Philosophy of Law. The lack of proper developments in the field of historiography of political and legal thought is the basis for distortions and falsifications of this field of knowledge, has a negative impact on the possibilities of effective development of theoretical and historical legal sciences and the use of historiographical contexts of branch legal disciplines. The development of a modern historiographical model of political and legal knowledge should be carried out taking into account the achievements of other socio-humanitarian sciences, logical-philosophical and historical-philosophical research, including a significant update of the methods and techniques of cognition used. An important role is played by the affirmation of the principles of reliability, verifiability and qualitative growth of knowledge, recognition of types of development and cultural and civilizational diversity. The article summarizes the experience and results of existing research on historiography in general and political and legal thought in particular, reveals some key problems of its development, demonstrates the possibilities and directions for improving the methodological aspects of historiography of political and legal thought.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Vladimir S. Gorban

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: gorbanv@gmail.com

Doctor of Law, Head of the Department of Philosophy of Law, History and Theory of State and Law, Head of the Interdisciplinary Center for Philosophical and Legal Studies

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Aristotle. Essays: in 4 vols. / transl. from ancient Greek M., 1983. Vol. 4. P. 376 (in Russ.).
  2. Bagaley D. I. Russian historiography: in 2 parts. Kharkov, 1911. Part 1 (in Russ.).
  3. Vernadsky G. V. Russian historiography. M., 1998 (in Russ.).
  4. Hugo V. M. The Unfortunate / Misérables / O. N. Popova and A. N. Engelhardt. St. Petersburg, 1902. Pp. II–III (in Russ.).
  5. Dostoevsky F. M. A number of articles about Russian literature // Dostoevsky F. M. Complete collection of works: in 30 vols. / editorial board: V. G. Bazanov (ed.) and others. L., 1978. P. 50 (in Russ.).
  6. Zenkovsky V. V. History of Russian philosophy: in 2 vols. M., 1956 (in Russ.).
  7. Ikonnikov V. S. The experience of Russian historiography: [vol. 1–2]. Kiev, 1891–1908 (in Russ.).
  8. Hilarion. The Word about Law and Grace / reconstruction of Ancient Russian. text by L. P. Zhukovskaya; transl., intro, pp. 5–27, V. Ya. Deryagin. M., 1994. Pp. 31, 33 (in Russ.).
  9. Ilyin I. A. General doctrine of law and the state. M., 2006. P. 222 (in Russ.).
  10. History of political and legal doctrines. The Ancient World / ed. V. S. Nersesyants. M., 1985. Pp. 27, 42 (in Russ.).
  11. History of religions / Mitr. Hilarion (Alfeev), proto. O. Korytko, proto. V. Vasechko. M., 2016. P. 346 (in Russ.).
  12. Kant I. Collection works: in 8 vols. M., 1994. Vol. 3. Criticism of pure reason; vol. 6. Religion within reason. Metaphysics of morals. Pp. 98, 99 (in Russ.).
  13. Kareev N. I. Theory of historical knowledge. St. Petersburg, 1913 (in Russ.).
  14. Krasheninnikova N. A., Chirkin S. V. Criticism of theories of bourgeois historiography as an integral part of the special course “The main problems of the feudal state and law” // Methods of teaching legal disciplines: collection of scientific works. M., 1986. Pp. 47–68 (in Russ.).
  15. Likhachev D. S. Cultural studies: selected works on Russian and world culture. SPb., 2006 (in Russ.).
  16. Likhachev D. S. Russian Culture. M., 2022. P. 17 (in Russ.).
  17. Lossky N. O. History of Russian Philosophy. SPb., 2018 (in Russ.).
  18. Mamut L. S. The formation of historiography of political and legal ideas // From the history of the development of political and legal ideas. M., 1984. Pp. 22–33 (in Russ.).
  19. Marx K. Manifesto of the Communist Party. M., 1951. Pp. 23, 24 (in Russ.).
  20. Milyukov P. N. The main currents of Russian historical thought. 3rd ed. St. Petersburg, 1913 (in Russ.).
  21. Pashukanis E. B. General theory of law and Marxism (Experience of criticism of basic legal concepts). M., 1924 (in Russ.).
  22. Petrazhitsky L. I. Introduction to the study of law and morality: fundamentals of emotional psychology. 3rd ed. St. Petersburg, 1908. P. 3 (in Russ.).
  23. Propp V. Ya. Historical roots of a fairy tale. SPb., 2021. P. 103 (in Russ.).
  24. Radbruch G. Philosophy of Law. M., 2004. Pp. 111, 112 (in Russ.).
  25. Rubinstein N. L. Russian historiography. M., 1941 (in Russ.).
  26. Savenkov A. N. Nuremberg: Verdict for name of Peace. M., 2021 (in Russ.).
  27. Tolstoy L. N. Letter to a student about law (1909) // Tolstoy L. N. Complete Collection of works / under the general editorship of V. G. Chertkov; 1909–1910. M., 1936. Vol. 38. Pp. 54–61 (in Russ.).
  28. Florensky P. A. At the watersheds of thought (features of concrete metaphysics). M., 2013. Vol. 1, 2 (in Russ.).
  29. Florensky P. A. Philosophy of cult (experience of Orthodox anthropodicy). M., 2014 (in Russ.).
  30. Chicherin B. N. History of political teachings. M., 1869– 1902. Ch. 1–5 (in Russ.).
  31. Shershenevich G. F. History of Philosophy of Law. SPb., 2001 (in Russ.).
  32. Shpet G. G. History as a problem of logic: critical. and the methodol. research. M., 1916. Part 1 (in Russ.).
  33. A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence. Vol. 1: The Law and The Right; vol. 2: Foundations of Law; vol. 3: Legal Institutions and the Sources of Law; vol. 4: Scienta Juris, Legal Doctrine as Knowledge of Law and as a Source of Law; vol. 5: Legal Reasoning, A Cognitive Approach to the Law. E. Pattaro, H. Rottleuthner, R. Shiner, A. Peczenik, G. Sartor. Springer, 2005.
  34. Bergbohm K. Jurisprudenz und Rechtsphilosophie: kritische Abhandlungen. Bd. 1: Einleitung. Abh. 1: Das Naturrecht der Gegenwart. 1892.
  35. Collingwood R. G. The principles of history and other writings in philosophy of history. Oxford, 1999.
  36. Einführung in die Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie der Gegenwart / herausgegeben von W. Hassemer, U. Neumann, F. Saliger. 9, neu bearbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Heidelberg, 2016.
  37. Einführung in Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie der Gegenwart / Kaufmann; Hassemer; Neumann (Hrsg.). 7, neu bearb. und erw. Aufl. Heidelberg, 2004.
  38. Falkner D. Straftheorie von Leo Tolstoi. Berlin, 2021.
  39. Feuerbach P. J.A. Blick auf die deutsche Rechtswissenschaft. München, 1810.
  40. Foster J. B. Transnational Tolstoy: between the West and the world. New York, 2013.
  41. Gumplowicz L. Der Rassenkampf: soziologische Untersuchungen. 2, durchges. und mit Anhang, enth. die 1875 erschienene Schrift “Rasse und Staat” vers. Aufl. Innsbruck, 1909.
  42. Hart H. The concept of law / ed. by Penelope A. Bulloch. 3rd ed. Oxford, 2012.
  43. Hegel. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Berlin, 1821.
  44. Historiography / ed. by R. M. Burns. Vol. 1: Foundations; Historiography. 2006; vol. 2: Society; vol. 3: Ideas; vol. 4: Culture; vol. 5: Politics. London, 2006.
  45. Horwitz M. J. “’Why Is Anglo-American Jurisprudence Unhistorical?” // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 1997. Vol. 17. No. 4. Pp. 551–86.
  46. Jaspers K. Vom Ursprung und Ziel der Geschichte. München, 1949.
  47. Jhering R. Unsere Aufgabe // Jahrbücher für die Dogmatik des heutigen römischen und deutschen Privatrechts. Bd. 1. 1857. S. 1–52.
  48. Kirchmann J. H. Die Werthlosigkeit der Jurisprudenz als Wissenschaft: ein Vortrag. Berlin, 1848.
  49. Martin E. Formen der Negation bei Lev Tolstoj. München, 2011.
  50. Mehmel G. Die reine Rechtslehre. Erlangen, 1815.
  51. Oakeshott M. On history and other essays. Totowa; New Jersey, 1983.
  52. Popper K. Das Elend des Historizismus. 5, verb. Aufl. Tübingen, 1979.
  53. Rahman M. M. Encyclopaedia of historiography. Vol. 2: Historiography: evolution and development. 2005; vol. 3: Historiography in India; vol. 4: Historiography: theory and philosophy; vol. 5: Historiography: sources and research.
  54. Rahman M. M. Historiography. Vol. 1: Traditions and Historians. New Delhi, India, 2005.
  55. Sapir B. M. Tolstoi und Dostojewsky über Probleme des Rechts. Hochschulschrift, 1932.
  56. Savigny F. Geschichte des Römischen Rechts im Mittelalter. Teil, Heidelberg, 1815.
  57. Savigny F. Vom Beruf unsrer Zeit für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft. Heidelberg, 1814.
  58. Tolstoj als theologischer Denker und Kirchenkritiker / Martin George / Jens Herlth / Christian Münch / Ulrich Schmid (Hg.). 2. Auflage. Göttingen, 2015.
  59. Wieacker F. Privatrechtsgeschichte der Neuzeit: unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der deutschen Entwicklung. 3, durchgesehene Auflage. Göttingen, 2016.
  60. Winch Р. The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. 2nd impr. London, 1960.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences