Historiographical models of reconstruction Of political and legal doctrines

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

The article discusses the problems of improving historiographical approaches to the coverage and interpretation of political and legal doctrines. The purpose of the study is to review and summarize the key problems of a general theoretical, methodological and special nature arising in connection with the modern dynamics of the development of the science of the history of political and legal doctrines. As a condition for the formation of universal or universal approaches to the historiography of political and legal thought, which have a generally significant character, a detailed and deeper elaboration of questions about the nature, content and focus of national literatures and other relevant sources is considered, which make it possible to draw up a cultural portrait of the type of development of national political and legal thought and literature covering it. At the same time, taking into account the peculiarities of national models of reconstruction of political and legal thought, it is necessary to pay closer attention to the explanation and interpretation of the concept of law, the use of disciplinary forms of mastering the subject of legal science, a conceptual series in which the main contours of the subject of the history of political and legal thought are fixed, as well as the presence of fundamentally different types of attitude to theoretical knowledge as such (for example, in the face of Anglo-American pragmatism). The study draws attention to fundamentally different methods and forms of describing the history of political and legal thought and its various plots in terms of their literary composition, means of expression, the nature of the existential-linguistic connection, and cultural features.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Vladimir Gorban

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: gorbanv@gmail.com

Doctor of Law, Head of the Sector of Philosophy of Law, History and Theory of State and Law, Head of the Interdisciplinary Center for Philosophical and Legal Studies

俄罗斯联邦, 10 Znamenka str., 119019 Moscow

参考

  1. Bobynin V. V. Philosophical scientific and pedagogical significance of the history of mathematics. M., 1886. P. 1 (in Russ.).
  2. World history: in 6 vols / ch. ed. A. O. Chubaryan. Vol. 1: Ancient World / res. ed. V. A. Golovina, V. I. Ukolova. M., 2011. P. 9 (in Russ.).
  3. Gorban V. S. “Pure” doctrines of law: their diversity in the history of legal thought and influence on the nature of modern legal science // Journal of Russ. law. 2023. Vol. 27. No. 12. Pp. 68–84 (in Russ.).
  4. Gorban V. S., Gruzdev V. S. On the realism of legal realism // Law and politics. 2023. No. 10. Pp. 24–37 (in Russ.).
  5. Husserl E. Logical research / author’s permission. transl. from German by E. A. Berstein; ed. and with a preface by S. L. Frank. SPb., 1909. Part 1 (in Russ.).
  6. Dostoevsky F. M. Brothers Karamazov: novel. SPb., 2012. Pp. 262–282 (in Russ.).
  7. Izbornik: collection of works of literature of Ancient Russia / comp. and the general ed. of L. A. Dmitriev and D. S. Likhachev; introduction by D. S. Likhachev, pp. 5–26. M., 1969. Pp. 8, 14 (in Russ.).
  8. Hilarion (Metropolitan Kievsky; XI century). The Word about Law and Grace / reconstruction of ancient Russ. text by L. P. Zhukovskaya; transl., intro. art., pp. 5–27, V. Ya. Deryagin; comment. V. Ya. Deryagin, A. K. Svetozarsky. M., 1994 (in Russ.).
  9. The history of political and legal doctrines. The Ancient World / res. ed. V. S. Nersesyants. M., 1985. Pp. 27–71 (in Russ.).
  10. Kant I. Collected works: in 8 vols. Vol. 3. Criticism of pure reason. M., 1994. P. 56 (in Russ.).
  11. Leontiev A. N. Evolution, movement, activity. M., 2012. Pp. 186, 189 (in Russ.).
  12. Likhachev D. S. Russian culture. M., 2022 (in Russ.).
  13. Nersesyants V. S. Law – mathematics of freedom: past experience and prospects. M., 1996 (in Russ.).
  14. Feuerbach P. J.A. Criminal Law. St. Petersburg, 1810. Book 1. P. 2 (in Russ.).
  15. Atiyah P. S. Pragmatism and Theory in English Law. London, 1987. Pp. 3, 4.
  16. Einführung in Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie der Gegenwart / Kaufmann; Hassemer; Neumann (Hrsg.). Mit Beitr. von Alfred Büllesbach … 7., neu bearb. und erw. Aufl. Heidelberg, 2004. S. 70, 77.
  17. Feuerbach P. J.A. Blick auf die deutsche Rechtswissenschaft. München, 1810.
  18. Hart H. The concept of law. 3rd ed. Oxford, 2012.
  19. Hugo G. Lehrbuch eines civilistischen Cursus. Teil: Zweyter Band: Lehrbuch des Naturrechts, als einer Philosophie des positiven Rechts. Berlin, 1799.
  20. Husserl G. Recht und Zeit. Frankfurt am Main, 1955. S. 14.
  21. Holmes O. W. The path of the law // Harvard law review. Vol. X. 1897. No. 8. Pp. 457–478.
  22. Jhering R. Der Geist des römischen Rechts auf den verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwicklung. Erster Teil. Leipzig, 1852.
  23. Jhering R. Der Kampf um’s Recht. Wien, 1872. S. 14.
  24. Jhering R. Der Zweck im Recht. Teil: Bd. 1. 4. Aufl. / erste Ausg. in volkstümlicher Gestalt. Leipzig, 1904.
  25. Jhering R. Geist des römischen Rechts auf den verschiedenen Stufen seiner Entwicklung. Teil: Th. 2, Abth. 1. Leipzig, 1854. VIII.
  26. Jhering R. Ist die Jurisprudenz eine Wissenschaft? Jherings Wiener Antrittsvorlesung vom 16. Oktober 1868. Aus dem Nachlaß hrsg. und mit einer Einführung, Erläuterungen sowie einer wiss.-geschichtl. Einordnung versehen von Okko Behrends. Göttingen, 1998.
  27. Jhering R. Law as a means to an end / transl. from the German by Isaac Husik – lecturer on philosophy in the University of Pennsylvania, with an editorial preface by Joseph H. Drake – Professor of law in the University of Michigan and with introductions by Henry Lamm – justice of the supreme court of Missouri and W. M. Geldart – Vinerian Professor of English Law in the University of Oxford. Boston, 1913
  28. Kelsen H. Reine Rechtslehre: mit einem Anhang: das Problem der Gerechtigkeit; unter Berücksichtigung von Kelsens Änderungen anlässlich der Übersetzung ins Italienische 1966 heraugegeben und eingeleitet von Matthias Jestaedt. Studienausgabe der 2. Auflage 1960. Tübingen; Wien, 2017. S. 21.
  29. Llewellyn K. N. On philosophy in American law // University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Vol. 82. 1934. No. 3. Pp. 205–212.
  30. Merkel A. Ueber das Verhältniss der Rechtsphilosophie zur “positiven” Rechtswissenschaft und zum allgemeinen Theil derselben // Zeitschrift für das privat- und öffentliche Recht der Gegenwart, 2 Teile in 1, Band 1. Wien, 1874. S. 402–421.
  31. Rechtsphilosophie im 21. Jahrhundert / hrsg. von Winfried Brugger, Ulfrid Neumann und Stephan Kirste. Frankfurt am Main, 2008.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2. Gorban

下载 (82KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024