Neurophysiological aspects of diagnosis of the pudendal nerve and sacral pathways: a summary literature review

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The aim of this work was to assess the main methods for diagnosing lesions of the pudendal nerve and sacral pathways, which include it. A critical analysis of the literature data was carried out with a generalization of the currently available results of original studies on identifying the causes of neurological disorders in diseases of the pelvic organs. Key scientific publications of different years, containing materials on this topic, placed in the PubMed, ResearchGate, eLibrary and other available sources were analyzed. The pudendal nerve is the caudal branch of the sacral plexus and facilitates the processes of urination and defecation, as well as perineal skin sensitivity and sexual function. The complex course of the pudendal nerve and the proximity to many dense anatomical structures contribute to the appearance of conditions for its external compression. Most often, the nerve can be compressed in three places (traps): in the space under the tense piriformis muscle, between the sacrospinous and sacroiliac ligaments, and in the genital canal (Alcock’s canal), formed by the splitting of the fascia of the internal obturator muscle. This article discusses advantages and disadvantages of the main diagnostic techniques used to diagnose damage to the pudendal nerve and the pathways, of which it is a part: bulbocavernous reflex, needle electromyography of the pelvic floor muscles with analysis of motor unit potentials, somatosensory and cutaneous sympathetic evoked potentials, transcranial and translumbar magnetic stimulation. Main attention is paid to the method of electrophysiological study of the bulbocavernosus reflex as the most popular and accessible in clinical practice. But despite the advantages of the described methods, currently there is no one that would allow to accurately determine the level of damage to the structures under study, which is often a very important aspect in the choice of tactics for the management and treatment of patients with neurological disorders of the pelvic organs.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Alexandra V. Shiryaeva

Privolzhsky Research Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: Sandonata@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9048-033X

аспирант кафедры неврологии, психиатрии и наркологии 

Russian Federation, 603950, Nizhny Novgorod, Minin and Pozharsky sq., 10/1

Kirill M. Belyakov

Privolzhsky Research Medical University

Email: kirmih@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4768-1355

доктор медицинских наук, доцент кафедры неврологии, психиатрии и наркологии ФДПО 

Russian Federation, 603950, Nizhny Novgorod, Minin and Pozharsky sq., 10/1

Elena A. Antipenko

Privolzhsky Research Medical University

Email: antipenkoea@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8972-9150

доктор медицинских наук, доцент, профессор и заведующий кафедрой неврологии, психиатрии и наркологии ФДПО 

Russian Federation, 603950, Nizhny Novgorod, Minin and Pozharsky sq., 10/1

Olga S. Streltsova

Privolzhsky Research Medical University

Email: strelzova_uro@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9097-0267
SPIN-code: 9674-0382
Scopus Author ID: 6506546102

доктор медицинских наук, доцент, профессор кафедры урологии им. Е. В. Шахова 

Russian Federation, 603950, Nizhny Novgorod, Minin and Pozharsky sq., 10/1

Ekaterina A. Alexandrova

Privolzhsky Research Medical University

Email: dalex1970@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5012-945X

кандидат медицинских наук, доцент кафедры неврологии, психиатрии и наркологии ФДПО 

Russian Federation, 603950, Nizhny Novgorod, Minin and Pozharsky sq., 10/1

References

  1. Amarenco G., Sheikh Ismaёl S., Verollet D. at al. Clinical and electrophysiological study of sensory penile alterations. A prospective study of 44 cases. Progrès en Urologie. 2013; 23 (11): 946–950. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2013.06.011.
  2. Wadhwa V., Hamid A.S., Kumar Y. at al. Pudendal nerve and branch neuropathy: magnetic resonance neurography evaluation. Acta Radiol. 2017; 58 (6): 726–733. doi: 10.1177/0284185116668213.
  3. Chowdhury S.K., Trescot A.M. Pudendal nerve entrapment. Peripheral nerve entrapments: Clinical diagnosis and management. Chapter 47. Anchorage: Springer Nature. 2016; 499–514. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-27482-9_47.
  4. Tackmann W., Porst H., Ahlen H. Bulbocavernosus reflex latencies and somatosensory evoked potentials after pudendal nerve stimulation in the diagnosis of impotence. J. Neurol. 1988; 235: 219–225. doi: 10.1007/BF00314350.
  5. Niu X., Shao B., Ni P. at al. Bulbocavernosus reflex and pudendal nerve somatosensory-evoked potentials responses in female patients with nerve system diseases. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2010; 27 (3): 207–211. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e3181dd4fca.
  6. Loening-Baucke V., Read N.W., Yamada T. at al. Evaluation of the motor and sensory components of the pudendal nerve. Electroencephalography Clin. Neurophysiol. 1994; 93 (1): 35–41. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90089-2.
  7. Ghezzi A., Callea L., Zaffaroni M. at al. Motor potentials of bulbocavernosus muscle after transcranial and lumbar magnetic stimulation: comparative study with bulbocavernosus reflex and pudendal evoked potentials. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1991; 54 (6): 524–526.
  8. Ploteau S., Perrouin-Verbe М.А., Labat J.J. at al. Anatomical variants of the pudendal nerve observed during a transgluteal surgical approach in a population of patients with pudendal neuralgia. Pain Physician. 2017; 20 (1): 137–143. ISSN 2150-1149.
  9. Kirshblum S., Eren F. Anal reflex versus bulbocavernosus reflex in evaluation of patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord Series and Cases. 2020; 6 (1): 2. doi: 10.1038/s41394-019-0251-3.
  10. Vodusek D.B., Janko M., Lokar J. Direct and reflex responses in perineal muscles on electrical stimulation. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1983; 46 (1): 67–71. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.46.1.67.
  11. Granata G., Padua L., Rossi F. at al. Electrophysiological study of the bulbocavernosus reflex: normative data. Funct. Neurol. 2013; 28 (4): 293–295. doi: 10.11138/FNeur/2013.28.4.293.
  12. Крупин В.Н., Белова А.Н. Нейроурология. Руководство для врачей. М.: Антидор. 2005; 464 с. [Krupin V.N., Belova A.N. Neyrourologiya. Rukovodstvo dlya vrachey. (Neurourology. A guide for physicians.) M.: Antidor. 2005; 464 р. (In Russ.)]
  13. Podnar S. Utility of sphincter electromyography and sacral reflex studies in women with cauda equina lesions. Neurourol. Urodynamics. 2014; 33 (4): 426–430. doi: 10.1002/nau.22414.
  14. Previnaire J.G. The importance of the bulbocavernosus reflex. Spinal Cord Series and Cases. 2017; 4 (2): 1–2. doi: 10.1038/s41394-017-0012-0.
  15. Bianchi F., Squintani G.M., Osio M. at al. Neurophysiology of the pelvic floor in clinical practice: a systematic literature review. Functional Neurol. 2017; 22 (4): 173–193. doi: 10.11138/fneur/2017.32.4.173.
  16. Подгурская М.Г., Каньшина Д.С., Яковлева Д.В., Виноградов О.И. Клинико-нейрофизиологическое исследо-вание тазовых нервов у взрослых и детей с нарушением функции мочеполовой системы. Соврем. пробл. здравоохр. и мед. статистики. 2018; (2): 123–135. [Podgurskaya M.G., Kanshina D.S., Yakovleva D.V., Vinogradov O.I. Clinical and neurophysiological study of pelvic nerves in adults and children with impaired function of the genitourinary system. Sovremennyye problemy zdravookhraneniya i meditsinskoy statistiki. 2018; (2): 123–135. (In Russ.)]
  17. Bianchi F., Squintani G.M., Osio M. et al. Neurophysiology of the pelvic floor in clinical practice: a systematic literature review. Functional Neurol. 2017; 32 (4): 173–193. doi: 10.11138/fneur/2017.32.4.173.
  18. Niu X., Wang X., Huang H. at al. Bulbocavernosus reflex test for diagnosis of pudendal nerve injury in female patients with diabetic neurogenic bladder. Aging and Dis. 2016; 7 (6): 715–720. doi: 10.14336/AD.2016.0309.
  19. Pelliccioni G., Piloni V., Sabbatini D. at al. Sex differences in pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2013; 18 (6): 2–6. doi: 10.1007/s10151-013-1105-9.
  20. Podnar S. Neurophysiologic studies of the sacral reflex in women with “non-neurogenic” sacral dysfunction. Neurourol. Urodynam. 2011; 30 (8): 1603–1608. doi: 10.1002/nau.21076.
  21. Tantiphlachiva K., Attaluri A., Valestin J. at al. Translumbar and transsacral motor-evoked potentials: a novel test for spino-anorectal neuropathy in spinal cord injury. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2011; 106 (5): 1–19. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.478.
  22. Örmeci B., Avcı E., Kaspar Ç. at al. A novel electrophysiological method in the diagnosis of pudendal neuropathy: position related changes in pudendal sensory evoked potentials. Urology. 2016; 99: 1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.09.040.
  23. Delodovici M.L., Fowler C.J. Clinical value of the pudendal somatosensory evoked potential. Electroencephalography and Clin. Neurophysiol. 1995; 96 (6): 509–515. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00081-9.
  24. Betts C.D., Jones S.J., Fowler C.G. et al. Erectile dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Associated neurological and neurophysiological deficits, and treatment of the condition. Brain. 1994; 117 (6): 1303–1310. doi: 10.1093/brain/117.6.1303.
  25. Zivadinov R., Zorzon M., Locatelli L. et al. Sexual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: a MRI, neurophysiological and urodynamic study. J. Neurol. Sci. 2003; 210 (1–2): 73–76. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(03)00025-x.
  26. Ashraf V.V., Taly A.B., Nair K.P. et al. Role of clinical neurophysiological tests in evaluation of erectile dysfunction in people with spinal cord disorders. Neurol. India. 2005; 53 (1): 32–35. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.15048.
  27. Rodi Z., Vodusek D.B., Denislic M. Clinical uroneurophysiological investigation in multiple sclerosis. Eur. J. Neurol. 1996; 3 (6): 574–580. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.1996.tb00275.x.
  28. Sau G.F., Aiello I., Siracusano S. et al. Pudendal nerve somatosensory evoked potentials in probable multiple sclerosis. Italian J. Neurol. Sci. 1997; 18 (5): 289–291. doi: 10.1007/BF02083306.
  29. Lefaucheur J.P. Transcranial magnetic stimulation. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Vol. 160 (3rd series). Clinical neurophysiology: Basis and technical aspects. Chapter 37. K.H. Levin, P. Chauvel, eds. 2019; 559–580. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64032-1.00037-0.
  30. Николаев С.Г. Электромиография: клинический практикум. Иваново: ПресСто. 2013; 394 с. [Nikolayev S.G. Elektromiografiya: klinicheskiy praktikum. (Electromyography: a clinical practice.) Ivanovo: PresSto. 2013; 394 р. (In Russ.)]
  31. Tas I., Yagiz O.A., Altay B. et al. Electrophysiological assessment of sexual dysfunction in spinal cord injured patients. Spinal Cord. 2007; 45 (4): 298–303. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101949.
  32. Courtois F.J., Gonnaud P.M., Charvier K.F. at al. Sympathetic skin responses and psychogenic erections in spinal cord injured men. Spinal Cord. 1998; 36 (2): 125–131. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100584.
  33. Ertekin C., Almis S., Ertekin N. Sympathetic skin potentials and bulbocavernosus reflex in patients with chronic alcoholism and impotence. Eur. Neurol. 1990; 30 (6): 334–337. doi: 10.1159/000117367.
  34. Ertekin C., Ertekin N., Mutlu S. at al. Skin potentials (SP) recorded from the extremities and genital regions in normal and impotent subjects. Acta Neurol. Scand. 1987; 76 (1): 28–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1987.tb03540.x.
  35. Rodic B., Curt A., Dietz V. et al. Bladder neck incompetence in patients with spinal cord injury: significance of sympathetic skin response. J. Urol. 2000; 163 (4): 1223–1227. doi: 10.1097/00005392-200004000-00036.
  36. Seçil Y., Yetimalar Y., Gedizlioglu M. et al. Sexual dysfunction and sympathetic skin response recorded from the genital region in women with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis. 2007; 13 (6): 742–748. doi: 10.1177/1352458506073647.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2021 Shiryaeva A.V., Belyakov K.M., Antipenko E.A., Streltsova O.S., Alexandrova E.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 75562 от 12 апреля 2019 года.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies