Residual nephroliths and their treatment


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

416 case histories of patients with different forms of urolithiasis aged 6 to 70 years who had undergone sectional nephrolithotomy (83, 19.9%), pyelonephrolithotomy (24, 5.8%), pyelolithotomy (146, 35.1%), percutaneous nephrolithotomy (163, 39.9%) were analysed. Residual nephroliths occurred in 108 (25.9%) patients. 98 of them were subjected to extracorporeal lithotripsy (ELT). To determine minimal possible interval between the operation and ELT, changes in the levels of lipid peroxidation products and concentration of aglutatliione-S-aminotransfcrase were studied. The results allowed the authors to optimize ELT after operative interventions for uroliths. In the course of 206 ELT sessions the residual uroliths were destroyed in 96 (97.9%) patients. After one session a complete fragmentation was achieved in 19 (19.4%) patients, after two sessions - in 64 (65.3%) patients, after three sessions and more - in 15 (15.3%). Pyoinflammatory complications developed in 8 (8.2%) patients while retrospectively such complications were encountered in 16 of 50 patients (32%). One month after ELT, the control examination found neither nephroliths nor their fragments in 85 (86.7%) patients, in patients with large and multiple stones elimination rate 1.5 months after the treatment was 69.5%. It is inferred that ELT is an effective method of residual uroliths elimination and is a method of choice in the treatment of such patients.

References

  1. Дзеранов Н. К. Дистанционная ударно-волновая литотрипсия мочекаменной болезни: Дис. ... д-ра мед. наук. - М., 1994.
  2. Лопаткин Н. А., Яненко Э. К. Лечение больных коралловидным нефролитиазом // Современные методы диагностики и лечения коралловидного нефролитиаза. - М., 1990. - С. 78-81.
  3. Лопаткин Н. А., Дзеранов Н. К. Дистанционная ударноволновая литотрипсия спустя 10 лет// Пленум Правления Всероссийского о-ва урологов: Материалы. - Екатеринбург, 1996. - С. 313-323.
  4. Мартов А. Г. Роль рентген-эндоскопических вмешательств в лечение осложнений дистанционной ударно-волновой литотрипсии // Пленум Всероссийского о-ва урологов: Тезисы докладов. - Пермь, 1994. - С. 219-220.
  5. Степанов В. Н., Колпаков И. С., Узденов М. А. Метафилактика нефролитиаза // Моск. мед. журн. - 2001. - № 1. - С. 13-16.
  6. Тиктинский О. Л., Александров В. П. Мочекаменная болезнь. - СПб. 2000. - С. 24.
  7. Трапезникова М. Ф., Дутов В. В., Мезенцев В. А. и др. Некоторые аспекты дистанционной литотрипсии в лечении мочекаменной болезни // Урол. и нефрол. - 1995. - № 5. - С. 3-6.
  8. Трапезникова М. Ф., Дутов В. В. Мочекаменная болезнь у пожилых пациентов // Избранные главы гериатрической урологии. - М., 2000. - С. 12S.
  9. Streem S. В. Long-term incidence and risk factors for recurrent stones following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy or percutaneous nephrostolithotomy/extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for infection related calculi // J. Urol. (Baltimore). - 1995. - Vol. 153, N 3, Pt 1. - P. 584-587.
  10. Tashiro K., hvamuro S., Nakajo H. et al. Stone recurrence after stone free status with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy // Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. - 1997. - Vol. 88. P. 434-438.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies