Roadmap of ultrasound-guided percutaneous access to the renal collecting system


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction. The key point of successful PCNL is getting access to the renal collecting system. Ureteral catheterization and injection of contrast material provide an important advantage of visualizing and dilating the collecting system. However, catheterization increases the operation time, exposure to anesthesia, and requires additional reusable and disposable medical supplies. The purpose ofthe study was to develop a surgical algorithm for accessing the renal collecting system for mini-PCNL without catheterization. Materials and methods. We analyzed the treatment results of 82 patients with a single kidney stone, who underwent mini-PCNL without prior catheterization of the ureter. The percutaneous access was obtained according to the roadmap we had developed. The puncture was performed under X-ray control and US guidance. For a calyx stone, the puncture was performed “to the stone”. For a pelvis stone, the targeted calyx was accessed using the following algorithm where each next step was performed if the puncture had been impossible at the previous one: 1. 30 min before the operation: infusion load of normal saline, 1000 ml. 2. Intraoperatively: intravenous furosemide, 60 mg. 3. Puncture “to the pelvic stone”, injecting contrast material into the collecting system and correcting the access puncture through the required calyx. Results. In all 82 cases, puncture access was performed without ureteral catheterization. In 20 patients with calyceal stones, puncture onto a stone was successfully performed in 100% of the cases. Of 62 patients with pelvic stones, preliminary infusion was enough to allow a successful puncture in 49 (79%), access after intravenous administration of furosemide was obtained in 13 (21%), and a primary puncture onto a pelvic stone had to be done in 6 (10%) patients. Conclusions. Our proposed algorithm for accessing the PCS of the kidney was successfully used in 100% of the cases. It makes possible to avoid routine ureteral catheterization and thus reduce the overall operation time and the risk of complications, as well as save medical supplies. Clearly, such results require that the surgeon should have significant experience with puncture interventions under ultrasound control.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

I. E Mamaev

Moscow City Clinical Hospital n.a. V.M. Buyanov; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: dr.mamaev@mail.ru
Cand.Med.Sci., head of urology department of Moscow city hospital n.a. V.M. Buyanov, assistant professor of the urology department of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University Moscow, Russia

K. K Akhmedov

Moscow City Clinical Hospital n.a. V.M. Buyanov

Email: k.k.akhmedov@gmail.com
urologist at the urology department Moscow, Russia

K. A Dolomanov

Moscow City Clinical Hospital n.a. V.M. Buyanov

Email: dolomanovkirill@gmail.com
urologist at the urology department Moscow, Russia

G. Sh Saypulaev

Moscow City Clinical Hospital n.a. V.M. Buyanov

urologist at the urology department Moscow, Russia

A. D Bolotov

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: adbolotov@gmail.com
Cand.Med.Sci. assistant at the department of urology and andrology Moscow, Russia

A. G Yusufov

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: yusufov@mail.ru
Cand.Med.Sci. assistant professor at the department of urology and andrology Moscow, Russia

S. V Kotov

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: urokotov@yandex.ru
Dr.Med.Sc., professor, head of the the urology and andrology department Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Fernstrom I., Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976;10(3):257-259. doi: 10.1080/21681805.1976.11882084
  2. Jackman S.V., Docimo S.G., Cadeddu J.A., Bishoff J.T., Kavoussi L.R., Jarrett T.W. The «mini-perc» technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. 1998;16(6):371-374. doi: 10.1007/s003450050083
  3. Valdivia Un'a J.G., Valle Gerhold J., Lopez Lopez J.A, et al. Technique and complications of percutaneous nephroscopy: experie.nce with 557 patients in the supine position. J Urol. 1998;160(6 Pt 1):1975-1978. Doi: 10.1016/ s0022-5347(01)62217-1.
  4. Moosanejad N., Firouzian A., Hashemi S.A., Bahari M., Fazli M.Comparison oftotally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: a randomized, clinical trial. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016;49(4):e4878. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20154878.
  5. Desai M. Ultrasonography-guided punctures-with and without puncture guide. J Endourol. 2009;23(10):1641-1643. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.153.
  6. Miller N.L., Matlaga B.R., Lingeman J.E. Techniques for fluoroscopic percutaneous renal access. J Urol. 2007 Jul;178(1):15-23. Doi: 10.1016/j. juro.2007.03.014. Epub 2007 May 11. PMID: 17574053.
  7. Labate G., Modi P., Timoney A,. et al. The percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: classification of complications. J Endourol. 2011;25(8):1275- 1280. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0067.
  8. Zegel H.G., Pollack H.M., Banner M.C., et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy: comparison of sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981;137(5):925-927. doi: 10.2214/ajr.137.5.925.
  9. Basiri A., Ziaee A.M., Kianian H.R., Mehrabi S., Karami H., Moghaddam S.M. Ultrasonographic versus fluoroscopic access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol. 2008;22(2):281- 284. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0141.
  10. Su L.M., Stoianovici D., Jarrett T.W., Patriciu A., Roberts W.W., Cadeddu J.A., Ramakumar S., Solomon S.B., Kavoussi L.R. Robotic percutaneous access to the kidney: comparison with standard manual access. J Endourol. 2002;16(7):471-475. doi: 10.1089/089277902760367421. PMID: 12396439.
  11. Rassweiler J.J., Muller M., Fangerau M., Klein J., Goezen A.S., Pereira P., Meinzer H.P., Teber D. iPad-assisted percutaneous access to the kidney using marker-based navigation: initial clinical experience. Eur Urol. 2012;61(3):628-631. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.024. Epub 2011 Dec 21. PMID: 22209052.
  12. Bader M.J., Gratzke C., Seitz M., Sharma R., Stief C.G., Desai M. The «all-seeing needle»: initial results of an optical puncture system confirming access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2011;59(6):1054-1059. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.026. Epub 2011 Apr 1. PMID: 21477921.
  13. Thomas A., Ewald J., Kelly I., Pierce M., Thomas J., Mattison B., West B., Ruckle D., Keheila M., Abourbih S., Krause R., Dinh V.A., Baldwin D.D., Baldwin D.D. Conventional vs Computer-Assisted Stereoscopic Ultrasound Needle Guidance for Renal Access: A Randomized Crossover Bench-Top Trial. J Endourol. 2018;32(5):424-430. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0015. Epub 2018 Mar 20. PMID: 29455556.
  14. Usawachintachit M., Tzou D.T., Mongan J., Taguchi K., Weinstein S., Chi T. Feasibility of Retrograde Ureteral Contrast Injection to Guide Ultrasonographic Percutaneous Renal Access in the Nondilated Collecting System. J Endourol. 2017;31(2): 129-134. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0693. Epub 2016 Nov 30. PMID: 27809568; PMCID: PMC5312625.
  15. Мамаев И.Э., Ахмедов К.К., Доломанов К.А., Сайпулаев Г.Ш., Мануйлова О.О., Степаненко К.В., Савкина К.В., Котов С.В. Миниперкутанная нефролитотомия без катетеризации мочеточника. Сравнение со стандартной методикой. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2021;14(2):58-63). doi: 10.29188/2222-8543-2021-14-2-58-63
  16. Tabibi A, Akhavizadegan H, Nouri Mahdavi K, Najafi Semnani M, Karbakhsh Davari M., Niroomand A.R. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without retrograde pyelography: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. Urol J. 2005;2(3):132-136.
  17. Eryildirim B., Tuncer M., Camur E., Ustun F., Tarhan F., Sarica K. Renal access in PNL under sonographic guidance: Do we really need to insert an open end ureteral catheter in dilated renal systems? A prospective randomized study. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2017;89(3):226-231. Published 2017 Oct 3. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2017.3.226.
  18. Biswas M., Mittal A, Sarpal R., Agrawal S., Pal R, Singh K. Whether retrograde pyelography mandatory for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized clinical trial. IJRMS. 2016; 10 (4): 4477-4480. doi: 10.18203/2320-6012. ijrms20163314.
  19. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205-213. doi: 10.1097/01. sla.0000133083.54934.ae. PMID: 15273542; PMCID: PMC1360123.
  20. Hunter J.M. The recovery period. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Jul;95(1):1-2. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei139. PMID: 15941733.
  21. Marcovich R., Smith A.D. Percutaneous renal access: tips and tricks. BJU Int. 2005;95 Suppl 2:78-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05205.x.
  22. Reddy S.V., Shaik A.B. Outcome and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy as primary versus secondary procedure for renal calculi.Int Braz J Urol. 2016;42(2):262-269. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538. IBJU.2014.0619.
  23. Chaurasia A. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Challenges for a Novice Urologist. Minim Invasive Surg. 2020;2020:5053714. Published 2020 May 8. doi: 10.1155/2020/5053714.
  24. Varkarakis J., Su L.M., Hsu T.H: Air embolism from pneumopyelography. J Urol. 2003;169:267.
  25. Giusti G,. Piccinelli A., Taverna G., et al. Miniperc? No, thank you!. Eur Urol. 2007;51(3):810-815. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.07.047.
  26. Fernandez A., Foell K., Nott L., Denstedt J.D., Razvi H. Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in patients with urinary diversions: a case-control comparison of perioperative outcomes. J Endourol. 2011 ;25(10): 1615- 1618. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0045.
  27. Hertzig L.L., Iwaszko M.R., Rangel L.J., Patterson D.E., Gettman M.T., Krambeck A.E. Urolithiasis after ileal conduit urinary diversion: a comparison of minimally invasive therapies. J Urol. 2013;189(6):2152- 2157. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.003.
  28. еl-Nahas A.R., Eraky I., el-Assmy A.M., et al. Percutaneous treatment of large upper tract stones after urinary diversion. Urology. 2006;68(3):500- 504. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.03.065.
  29. Yagci C., Ustuner E., Atman E.D., Baltaci S., Uzun C., Akyar S. Diuretic agent and normal saline infusion technique for ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrostomies in nondilated pelvicaliceal systems. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2013;36(2):492-497. doi: 10.1007/s00270-012-0461-6.
  30. Patel U., Hussain F.F. Percutaneous nephrostomy of nondilated renal collecting systems with fluoroscopic guidance: technique and results. Radiology. 2004;233(1):226-233. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2331031342
  31. Ray C.E. Jr, Brown A.C., Smith M.T., Rochon P.J. Percutaneous access of nondilated renal collecting systems. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2014;31(1):98-100. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1363849.
  32. Gupta S., Gulati M., Suri S. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrostomy in non-dilated pelvicaliceal system. J Clin Ultrasound. 1998;26(3):177-179. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0096(199803/04)26:3<177::aid-jcu13>3.0.co;2-8
  33. Sellers N., Patel U. Percutaneous access of non-dilated kidneys: the value of gaseous contrast media (abstr). Presented at the annual meeting of the European Society of Uro-genital Radiology, Strasbourg, France, 1998. Eur Radiol 1998; 8:1087.
  34. Chau W.K., Chan S.C. Improved sonographic visualization by fluid challenge method of renal lithiasis in the nondilated collecting system. Experience in seven cases. Clin Imaging. 1997;21 (4):276-283. doi: 10.1016/s0899-7071(96)00043-5. PMID: 9215476.
  35. Sampaio F.J., Zanier J.F., Aragao A.H., Favorito L.A.Intrarenal access: 3-dimensional anatomical study. J Urol. 1992;148(6):1769-1773. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37024-6. PMID: 1433604.
  36. Ramchandani P., Cardella J.F., Grassi C.J., Roberts A.C., Sacks D. Schwartzberg M.S., Lewis C.A. Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous nephrostomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(9 Pt 2):S277-2781. PMID: 14514833.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies