Calico-venous fistulae: an intrarenal complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Bleeding is a serious complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). A rare cause of gross hematuria is a calico-venous fistula. A clinical case of successful intraoperative diagnosis and treatment of calico-venous fistula during PCNL is presented in the article. Description of a clinical case. A patient J., 53 years old, underwent examination and treatment at the Institute of Urology and Reproductive Health, FGAOU VO I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University with a diagnosis of staghorn stone of the right kidney, a stone of the left kidney, chronic right-side pyelonephritis. On June 15, 2021, mini-PCNL was performed for the staghorn stone of the right kidney. The procedure seemed to be unremarkable, but during intraoperative antegrade pyelography, the inflow of contrast agent from the lower calyxes into the posterior segmental vein of the right kidney was detected, which was managed by creating sufficient traction of the nephrostomy drainage. Communication of the collecting and venous systems of the kidney is associated with a risk of both severe gross hematuria and urine flow into the venous bed. The urine flow into the bloodstream may result in hemodynamic disturbances, up to collapse followed by cardiac arrest. In order to prevent complications of PCNL it is necessary to analyze the kidney anatomy based on three-dimensional modeling of contrast-enhanced computed tomography. A calicovenous fistula can be a source of risk of bleeding and severe complications. To minimize intraoperative damage to parenchymal structures, an analysis of three-dimensional modeling of a kidney in patients with staghorn calculus based on computed tomography is required, which allows rational planning of surgical tactics.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

N. E Kalinin

Institute of Urology and Reproductive Health, FGAOU VO I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: nikita150293@yandex.ru
Ph.D. student Moscow, Russia

S. H Ali

Institute of Urology and Reproductive Health, FGAOU VO I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: ali_s_kh@staff.sechenov.ru
Ph.D., urologist Moscow, Russia

E. A Bezrukov

Institute of Urology and Reproductive Health, FGAOU VO I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: bezrukov_e_a@staff.sechenov.ru
Ph.D., MD, Professor, Head of the Department of Urology №1 Moscow, Russia

M. A Gazimiev

Institute of Urology and Reproductive Health, FGAOU VO I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University; National Medical Research Center for «Urology» of FGAOU VO I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: gazimiev@yandex.ru
M.A. - Ph.D., MD, Professor, Deputy Director for Academic Work, Institute of Urology and Reproductive Health Moscow, Russia

References

  1. de la Rosette J., Assimos D., Desai M., Gutierrez J., Lingeman J., Scarpa R., Tefekli A., CROES PCNL Study Group. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol. 2011;25(1):11-17.
  2. Seitz C., Desai M., Hacker A., Hakenberg O.W., Liatsikos E., Nagele U., Tolley D. Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Eur Urol. 2012;61(1):146-158.
  3. Said S.H.A., Al Kadum Hassan M.A., Ali R.H.G., Aghaways I., Kakamad F.H., Mohammad K.Q. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; alarming variables for postoperative bleeding. Arab J Urol. 2017;15(1):24-29.
  4. Srivastava A., Singh K.J., Suri A., Dubey D., Kumar A., Kapoor R., Mandhani A., Jain S. Vascular complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: are there any predictive factors? Urology. 2005;66(1):38-40.
  5. Goodwin W.E., Casey W.C., Woolf W. Percutaneous trocar (needle) nephrostomy in hydronephrosis. J Am Med Assoc. 1955;157(11):891-894.
  6. Wickham J.E., Kellett M.J. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Br J Urol. 1981;53(4):297-299.
  7. Ruhayel Y., Tepeler A., Dabestani S., MacLennan S., Petfik A., Sarica K. Seitz C., Skolarikos A., Straub M., Turk C., Yuan Y., Knoll T. Tract Sizes in Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review from the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel. Eur Urol. 2017;72(2):220-235.
  8. Wallace M.A. Anatomy and physiology of the kidney. AORN J. 1998;68(5):800, 803-816, 819-20; quiz 821-824.
  9. Weigel J.D., Egal M., Bakker J. Fatal calyceal-venous fistula.Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(11):1805.
  10. Chan Y.H., Wong K.M., Kwok P.C.H., Liu A.Y.L., Choi K.S., Chau K.F., Li C.S. A veno-caliceal fistula related to ureteric stricture in a kidney allograft masquerading as renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;49(4):547-551.
  11. Geara A., Kamal L., El-Imad B., El-Sayegh S. Visualization of the renal vein during pyelography after nephrostomy: a case report. J Med Case Reports. 2010;23;4:93.
  12. Skolarikos A., de la Rosette J. Prevention and treatment of complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Opin Urol. 2008;18(2): 229-234.
  13. Rastogi N., Zawacki W., Alencar H. Coexisting intrarenal arteriovenous and caliceovenous fistulae after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Case report and literature review.Interv Med Appl Sci. 2013;5(2):81-84.
  14. Глыбочко П.В., Аляев Ю.Г., Безруков Е.А., Сирота Е.С., Песегов С.В., Проскура А.В. 3D-технологии как элемент планирования, реального осуществления, а также симуляции оперативного пособия при коралловидном нефролитиазе. Урология. 2015;(3): 105-108
  15. Ganpule A.P., Mishra S., Desai M.R. Multiperc versus single perc with flexible instrumentation for staghorn calculi. J Endourol. 2009;23(10):1675-1678.
  16. Kukreja R., Desai M., Patel S., Bapat S., Desai M. Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Prospective study. J Endourol. 2004;18(8):715-722.
  17. He Z., Tang F., Lu Z., He Y, Wei G, Zhong F., Zeng G., Wu W., Yan L., Li Z.Comparison of Supracostal and Infracostal Access For Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol J. 2019;16(2):107-114.
  18. Cracco C.M., Scoffone C.M. ECIRS (Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery) in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new life for percutaneous surgery? World J Urol. 2011;29(6):821-827.
  19. Falagario U.G., Calo B., Auciello M., Carrieri G., Cormio L. Advanced ureteroscopic techniques for the management of kidney stones. Curr Opin Urol. 2021;31(1):58-65.
  20. Scoffone C.M., Cracco C.M. Invited review: the tale of ECIRS (Endoscopic Combined IntraRenal Surgery) in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position. Urolithiasis. 2018;46(1):115-123.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies